Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
LOL move fast? Monterey supports select Macs back from 2013. Lordy your choice of words. SMH.
A solitary Mac line and only spared the charnel house along with the 2014 Mini because Apple forwent updating it for several years. Remember how Apple was unabashed about selling both ageing lines at more or less full RRP long after competitors had moved on in terms of hardware?

Apple has always been fairly unsentimental about puttting its former "Best Mac Ever" out to pasture sooner rather than later. You can unshake that head of yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
A solitary Mac line and only spared the charnel house along with the 2014 Mini because Apple forwent updating it for several years. Remember how Apple was unabashed about selling both ageing lines at more or less full RRP long after competitors had moved on in terms of hardware?
I don't understand single word you wrote here. Looks like gibberish.

"A solitary Mac line and only spared the charnel house along with the 2014 Mini"
What does that even mean??? Check your wording. SMH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FedUpFanBoy
Whelp I guess that settles it. Time for a new iMac.
Apple's planned obsolesce of perfectly good and fully functional "machines" is disgusting at best. My 2014 27" 5K Retina iMac and 2014 15" Retina MBP are both going to be no longer supported. Yet they work perfectly fine, most likely more stable and reliable than the new M1 Macs. That is a HUGE slap in the face. I will keep both machines and I have no intentions of putting either of them out to pasture. I also have no intentions of purchasing "equivalent" new M1 Macs. That would cost at least $7,500.............just so they can receive the bloatware and eye candy that Apple is bringing to the Mac Computer Lineup? I do not need, want, or crave any of the NEW CRAP that macOS Monterey brings to the table. Yes, I will miss the excellent Apple security updates, but that is a risk I will tolerate. Timmy Apple does not get any extra cash from my pocket this time. I wonder what Microsoft Windows 11 is going to be like? No, I do not plan on going to the Dark Side, but I also do not appreciate Apple turning their back on perfectly good and fully functional "machines". I am probably the only one that is not at all excited or impressed with the NEW MacOS Monterey. This new marketing ploy to "force" Apple Owners into the new M1 or Mx product line has Microsoft STENCH all over it. Thanks Tim.
 
Apple's planned obsolesce of perfectly good and fully functional "machines" is disgusting at best. My 2014 27" 5K Retina iMac and 2014 15" Retina MBP are both going to be no longer supported. Yet they work perfectly fine, most likely more stable and reliable than the new M1 Macs. That is a HUGE slap in the face. I will keep both machines and I have no intentions of putting either of them out to pasture. I also have no intentions of purchasing "equivalent" new M1 Macs. That would cost at least $7,500.............just so they can receive the bloatware and eye candy that Apple is bringing to the Mac Computer Lineup? I do not need, want, or crave any of the NEW CRAP that macOS Monterey brings to the table. Yes, I will miss the excellent Apple security updates, but that is a risk I will tolerate. Timmy Apple does not get any extra cash from my pocket this time. I wonder what Microsoft Windows 11 is going to be like? No, I do not plan on going to the Dark Side, but I also do not appreciate Apple turning their back on perfectly good and fully functional "machines". I am probably the only one that is not at all excited or impressed with the NEW MacOS Monterey. This new marketing ploy to "force" Apple Owners into the new M1 or Mx product line has Microsoft STENCH all over it. Thanks Tim.
You will get official security updates probably until late 2023 with Big Sur.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
This seems like a pretty minor update to Big Sur, it makes no sense (except from a planned obsolescence point of view) to drop support for the Late 2014 5K iMac. Really sucks to see Apple still doing things like this.
That is exactly the same scenario I am about to be put through. But, in reality, I have no interest in installing the NEW macOS Monterey on either my 2014 15" Retina MBP or my 2014 27" 5K iMac anyway. It is a new Apple Marketing Ploy, people are freaking out and already saying they plan to buy a NEW M1 Silicon Mac. That is kind of like buying a NEW Lamborghini Sports Car to get to and from the local grocery store, when your Ford Focus will do just fine, and it is already paid for. For a "Multi-BILLION Dollar" corporation, Apple is making it difficult for me to remain a 30 year Apple FanBoy much longer. macOS Big Sur lasted about a year, then BAM, BAM, BAM. Maybe Timmy Apple wants to line his pockets with more of his user's HARD EARNED GOLD before retiring. There are a lot of people who will abandon their perfectly good 2014 Mac's and take the leap into buying a NEW M1 Silicon Mac. The NEW macOS Monterey is making the Mac Operating System look and feel and even function like a BLOATED iPad. I do not NEED and do not WANT a glorified iPad in lieu of a Mac Computer. Too bad for Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
Do the Apple Silicon Macs have the same problem with battery swelling? My mid-2015 Macbook Pro might be just starting to show signs of that problem, if Apple has not made any changes related to this, I'm not buying a 2021 Macbook of any kind.
All notebook batteries eventually swell. That's a safety feature (they swell rather than explode). But some computers have had issues where they wear out too quickly. 6 years is about normal for needing to replace a battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefinTuna
I don't understand single word you wrote here. Looks like gibberish.

"A solitary Mac line and only spared the charnel house along with the 2014 Mini"
What does that even mean??? Check your wording. SMH.
Apple kept selling the 2014 Mac mini as "new" until 2018. They commit to supporting products for 5 years after they are last sold as "new." The 2015 MacBook Air and 2012 pre-retina 13" MacBook Pro were also sold as "new" for several years and similarly got extended OS updates.
 
Understood. My point is I think Apple should put Series 3 put it to sleep permanently.
Apple cannot kill off the Apple Watch 3, they still sell it on their website and it is still a very popular model in MANY retail stores. They would look foolish if they discontinued a device that is still being marketed and sold...............Oh wait, that is the exact same scenario with the macOS Monterey debacle and planned obsolesce of MANY perfectly good and highly functional Mac Computers. That really wreaks of a Microsoft ploy..........I guess Timmy Apple is saying in no uncertain terms that it really is "all about the Benjamins". Bad move Apple.
 
This seems like a pretty minor update to Big Sur, it makes no sense (except from a planned obsolescence point of view) to drop support for the Late 2014 5K iMac. Really sucks to see Apple still doing things like this.

That is, what disappoints me, I see mo real reason why the 2014 iMac would not be able to run Monterey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FedUpFanBoy
Apple kept selling the 2014 Mac mini as "new" until 2018. They commit to supporting products for 5 years after they are last sold as "new." The 2015 MacBook Air and 2012 pre-retina 13" MacBook Pro were also sold as "new" for several years and similarly got extended OS updates.
Apple HAS supported machines for 5 years. Older machines still get software and security updates all the way back to High Sierra. Unless you can show me where Apple states that up until the final day machines are sold they will have free OS upgrades from 5 years beyond then the word "support" doesn't apply to OS upgrades, but rather software and security updates which is what they have done.

I don't personally understand why people care so much about getting the latest OS when they have machines 7+ years old. These machines have outdated bluetooth modules which Airplay will not work with and various other outdated hardwares that won't work well or at all with newer OS technologies.

Mojave is a very good OS that supports MacBook Pros back to 2012, and there's no reason why very old supported machines should not be running it.

But I have a question for you. Would you be willing to continue paying the $129 for MacOS that Apple used to charge every year? I mean if you feel they should continue supporting very old hardware then what's it worth to you? Microsoft isn't giving away licensed and activated versions of Windows 10 to customers with legacy machines. They are charging customers for it. I'm certain the same will hold true for the next forthcoming version of Windows being announced this month.

Also you may not like what I am about to say but look at this from a business standpoint rather than personal. Why should a company continue putting forth financial resources to provide support for free OS upgrades to very legacy machines? Customers with 2014 Macs and earlier are not making Apple money, especially if Apple continues to give them a reason not to upgrade. Perhaps if you were running your own business then you wouldn't be so giving to offer freebies year after year to your customers which would prevent them from spending anymore money towards your business.
 
Last edited:
I always thought this was the biggest pile of BS ever. This is the biggest company on Earth and they couldn't write their own driver for it?
Some WiFi devices cease to receive vendor security updates because they are EOL. It seems both the WiFi devices and discrete GPU are most susceptible to being deemed vintage when it comes to MacOS because the lack performance criteria. The 2012 retina MBP that I have fell off the Big Sur supported Macs previously just for what you are irritated about. It still has seen many security patches with 10.15.7 system, but it’s end of the road. Just trade them or sell them before problems appear then it’s essentially worthless to repair. Old computers in companies are usually refreshed every 3 - 4 years to avoid reaching the point where they are not worth selling to recoup part of purchasing expense anyway as another guide. Hanging onto older computers just isn’t worth it as these modern computers seems less and less durable compared to earlier examples. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
I think it's because the Mini 2014 was a current device till 2018. Someone who bought their Mini in September 2018 would have had less than 3 years of useful updates for it (plus 2 further years of security patches thereafter). I would have assumed that Apple would throw the older MacBook Pros of the same generation the same bone but they stopped being sold in 2014/15 which is more like the 6-7 years of useful updates that Apple would prefer to offer.

I guess this is the bit where Apple might start regretting their decision to let the Mac Mini 2014 live on so long, but they can just dish out refurbished M1 Minis if anyone with a 2014 Mini needs a replacement unit before 2023/24. Amazingly, Intel have finally stopped making the Haswell mobile CPUs at some point and the Coffee Lake CPUs from the 2018 Mini are going to be discontinued this year so it's not like Apple can order replacement parts unless they have a pool of new 2018 models stockpiled for a year or two.

Very insightful!
 
2014 mac mini user here. Woah, it‘s still supported!
Hopefully it won’t lose many features compared with the most recent macs.

I’m specially interested on the Continuity+ feature (that I suggested to Craig a year ago)
Same here!

I remember when I went to purchase it, the salesperson suggested the 2012 model because the memory became soldered and it was much harder to replace the storage in the 2014 model. I went with the 2014 model anyway because I assumed that a newer model would have a longer lifespan.
 
Also you may not like what I am about to say but look at this from a business standpoint rather than personal. Why should a company continue putting forth financial resources to provide support for free OS upgrades to very legacy machines?
Because Microsoft exists and I can draw comparisons to them. My Lenovo Thinkcentre in my family business is still going strong after 7 years and will so for years to come. It's purchase date was May 2014, the same age as many of the machines being binned from Monterey.

Even in the Apple universe, my 2010 Mac Pro that I only retired in January saw official updates from Snow Leopard to Mojave.
 
Because Microsoft exists and I can draw comparisons to them. My Lenovo Thinkcentre in my family business is still going strong after 7 years and will so for years to come. It's purchase date was May 2014, the same age as many of the machines being binned from Monterey.

Even in the Apple universe, my 2010 Mac Pro that I only retired in January saw official updates from Snow Leopard to Mojave.
I like how you cherrypicked my post and returned it with that response. 🙄. My post was referring to people complaining about Apple not supporting legacy Macs well over 7+ years old with FREE OS upgrades. Microsoft is not putting out new OS's and telling all customers with very old machines to simply download the newest version of Windows and it will be licensed and activated free of charge. Not sure why you needed to mention your Lenovo machine. It's completely irrelevant to this topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevin Dem
Same here!

I remember when I went to purchase it, the salesperson suggested the 2012 model because the memory became soldered and it was much harder to replace the storage in the 2014 model. I went with the 2014 model anyway because I assumed that a newer model would have a longer lifespan.
Exactly. Well, I bought it second hand but it was like new.

Sadly, no Universal Control for us :(
 
I R sad... my rMBP mid 2014 which has been my trusty workhorse for so many years seems, is now a point of anger that I can't have new things to play with. Now, how to convince the wife...
 
Because Microsoft exists and I can draw comparisons to them. My Lenovo Thinkcentre in my family business is still going strong after 7 years and will so for years to come. It's purchase date was May 2014, the same age as many of the machines being binned from Monterey.

Even in the Apple universe, my 2010 Mac Pro that I only retired in January saw official updates from Snow Leopard to Mojave.

Comparing apples to oranges. Microsoft has to sell the maximum number of licenses so its OS should work on the largest number of hardware. On the other hand, Apple has to sell the maximum number of hardware as it doesn’t charge for its OS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maconplasma
I like how you cherrypicked my post and returned it with that response. 🙄. My post was referring to people complaining about Apple not supporting legacy Macs well over 7+ years old with FREE OS upgrades. Microsoft is not putting out new OS's and telling all customers with very old machines to simply download the newest version of Windows and it will be licensed and activated free of charge. Not sure why you needed to mention your Lenovo machine. It's completely irrelevant to this topic.
No, everything is relevant when Windows is MacOS' main competition. I've got a couple machines in the building that came with Windows 8 and got a free boost to 10 eons ago. Learn a thing or two about Windows, there have been dozens of builds some small and other big that can be seen as Apple's annual OS updates.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Maconplasma
Anybody wanna explain to me why Late 2013 and Mid 2014 macbook pro’s are out? I mean, at least for 15”, from Late-2013 to Mid-2015 it’s pretty much the same friggin device. At least the IGP models….
I think that’s the point. Apple is done with NVidia once and for all. The 2015s use AMD chips. Probably easier to just stop all machines of that vintage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
So Broadwell and newer. Though that wouldn't explain the 2015 15" MacBook Pro and 2014 Mac mini, both of which are Haswell, nor the 2013 Mac Pro which is Ivy Bridge-E. I know with Big Sur it all came down to a Wi-Fi card driver. I wonder what the dividing line is here. Also, this worries me as I didn't think we'd see Broadwell Macs being a minimum requirement for a good while. I feel like we only have two more cullings before Intel Macs are out of support altogether (one wherein its 2016 and newer, and then one where T2 Macs are the only Intel Macs still supported). Sad.
T1 and T2 seems to be a good dividing line for the next big OS purge. The snag with this is that iMacs didn't get T2 until the 2020 model.
 
Apple is making it difficult for me to remain a 30 year Apple FanBoy much longer. macOS Big Sur lasted about a year, then BAM, BAM, BAM. Maybe Timmy Apple wants to line his pockets with more of his user's HARD EARNED GOLD before retiring. There are a lot of people who will abandon their perfectly good 2014 Mac's and take the leap into buying a NEW M1 Silicon Mac. The NEW macOS Monterey is making the Mac Operating System look and feel and even function like a BLOATED iPad. I do not NEED and do not WANT a glorified iPad in lieu of a Mac Computer. Too bad for Apple.
No one should buy a system they do not want. Luckily for Apple approximately half of the Mac purchased in a year are going to users new to the Mac, so that’s a LOT of new folks to replace those are just fed up. And, in another 20 years or so, I’d reckon THOSE folks will be fed up and so on and so on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maconplasma
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.