How funny that you guys believe he has gotten a review unit just because he said so. This dude is a compulsive liar. He is just playing
Do you have any credibility or you chiming in to support Apple? Lots of Apple supporters on here ready to convict Prosser on a civil case where no evidence has even been disclosed yet.
He has to live in South Sudan then. A fitting endSurely it’s not a criminal case so no lock him up could happen. But a hefty judgment in Apple’s favor would suck for Prosser but then he could just file bankruptcy and it would be pointless to go after more. And Prosser could just sell the YT channel and website to a shell company for $1 and would be untouchable if offshore.
Same stuff with Chinese bloggers who constantly leak their info.Like what, Apple going after those two Russians unboxing the M5 iPad Pros? Good luck with that! 😉
It also shows that Apple has no control over their own supply chain if their unshipped devices land into hands of russian bloggers
Prosser had yet to respond to the complaint or otherwise appear in the case
Lots of people trying to make Prosser innocent and assuming Apple is in the wrong.
Yeah, just because the front door was unlocked doesn’t absolve you of breaking and entering.Ridiculous. You’re not allowed to access another persons device without authorization. No agreement is required.
If you leave your laptop open and I walk by and see something on the screen, there’s no foul. But if I sit down at your laptop and start browsing it (say it’s unlocked) that’s illegal.
Unauthorized access to a computer doesn’t mean you have to break in or steal their password.
Maybe Apple will look the other way after he’s latest iPhone Air review.
Laying it on pretty thick. He’s clearly hoping Apple would forgive him.So why are Apple giving him a review unit of the iPhone Air, someone who they have never given a review unit too before 🤔
Excuse me!imaging getting sued for releasing info on perhaps one of the worst ever iOS versions. Double whammy
I find the analogy much more complicated and hard to follow than the actual facts of the case.If I walk into a candy shop and the owner (Apple) gives me a candy bar and says, "I would appreciate you telling others about this candy bar", that is much different from me walking into the candy shop (Apple), taking the candy bar without permission, and walking out. On top of that, when I took that candy bar without permission, I had my buddy distract the employee behind the candy counter so I could take the candy bar.
That is the very basics of what happened.
Laying it on pretty thick. He’s clearly hoping Apple would forgive him.
The desire for attention on social media has screwed-up a lot of peoples lives. They seem to lose common sense when the possibility of 400,000 views appears. If that's even what he got.
If he's actually facing a default judgement he can only be very stupid: that would be basically giving Apple a literal no-contest win.
Why would you wish that on someone?! Because he leaked somewhat inaccurate info on an unreleased software of your favourite tech company?! Absurdity!They should sue him for a BILLION dollars and then he will be broke living on the streets