Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Surely it’s not a criminal case so no lock him up could happen. But a hefty judgment in Apple’s favor would suck for Prosser but then he could just file bankruptcy and it would be pointless to go after more. And Prosser could just sell the YT channel and website to a shell company for $1 and would be untouchable if offshore.
He has to live in South Sudan then. A fitting end
 
Like what, Apple going after those two Russians unboxing the M5 iPad Pros? Good luck with that! 😉
Same stuff with Chinese bloggers who constantly leak their info.

Probably this is because it would be a no-win case for them since courts in said countries are crooked and will side with leakers no matter what. In US they are playing tough guys just because they feel they can. But tbh I dunno what’s the point of such a greedy and fat corporation to go after such a small blogger as Jon Prosser.

It also shows that Apple has no control over their own supply chain if their unshipped devices land into hands of russian bloggers
 
It also shows that Apple has no control over their own supply chain if their unshipped devices land into hands of russian bloggers

How could Apple realistically control the supply chain in China? Once thousands of devices are made and are just sitting there awaiting their release, a few boxes can easily be “damaged” and sold to those YouTubers, probably for much more than the actual price of the device in question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uacd
Prosser had yet to respond to the complaint or otherwise appear in the case

IMG_1154.jpeg
 
  • Love
Reactions: kitKAC
Ridiculous. You’re not allowed to access another persons device without authorization. No agreement is required.

If you leave your laptop open and I walk by and see something on the screen, there’s no foul. But if I sit down at your laptop and start browsing it (say it’s unlocked) that’s illegal.

Unauthorized access to a computer doesn’t mean you have to break in or steal their password.
Yeah, just because the front door was unlocked doesn’t absolve you of breaking and entering.
 
If this was 15-16 years back, these leaks made lots of splash. They are worth nothing but can end up hurting Apple in trade rivalry.
 
If I walk into a candy shop and the owner (Apple) gives me a candy bar and says, "I would appreciate you telling others about this candy bar", that is much different from me walking into the candy shop (Apple), taking the candy bar without permission, and walking out. On top of that, when I took that candy bar without permission, I had my buddy distract the employee behind the candy counter so I could take the candy bar.

That is the very basics of what happened.
I find the analogy much more complicated and hard to follow than the actual facts of the case.
 
The desire for attention on social media has screwed-up a lot of peoples lives. They seem to lose common sense when the possibility of 400,000 views appears. If that's even what he got.

What does that even translate monetarily speaking? Or are these leakers just in it for the notoriety and clout?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
Posner has always come across as smug and cocky.

He flew too close to the sun this time though. It’s gonna hurt falling out of the sky.
 
If he's actually facing a default judgement he can only be very stupid: that would be basically giving Apple a literal no-contest win.

The guys play is most certainly chapter 7 after a default judgement. Not acting accelerates the process with less legal expense. This advise was probably recommended to him by an attorney believe it or not. I was once recommended similar for something on a much smaller scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arran
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.