Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't see what so many of you or going on about. At this point in time there is NO value in manufactures including TB ports when there is nothing to plug into them. It doesn't mean they won't pick it up later but there is no value in it at this time.

so if i buy a computer now, it shouldn't have a port for things that aren't out YET? (but are coming out)

how lame would that be--you just buy a computer but you miss out on a great port because they didn't include it until the drives came out

lame and short sighted
 
Ahead of the curve

;) When useful Thunderbolt peripherals begin appearing, particularly some item that many are excited about, then Hewlett Packard may find itself in the position of making excuses. Of its marketing department hurriedly assuring customers that Thunderbolt is just around the corner in the next iteration of the HP lineup.

Some dismissing this technology now may wonder what HP was thinking, or if wishing to wait on them.

Apple is wise to get ahead of the curve on this. They might also be thanked in helping this advancement forward, before many saw the need, but prospective vendors now witnessing a growing customer base able, and some certainly willing, to purchase such a product.
 
Yep.

FW800 has worked mighty wonderfully for me for years. And it only takes 5 seconds to Google a 400 to 800 cable from actual vendors, not shady eBay dealers:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...roogle-_-Cables-_-Cables+Unlimited-_-12339059

Troll harder next time.

I've got 3 TB of SATA drives hanging off of my iMac Corei7 using a Firewire800 connection and it works fine. Thanks to OWC computing for the case necessary.

As far as FW400, I've got a video camera, a 20 gig ipod and a few other things so I have some 800 to 400 cables around too.
 
Thunderbolt cinema display

I'm really looking foward the update of Apple's cinema display that will include thunderbolt so that only 2 cables to plug in your macbook:
1. Mag safe (power)
2. Thunderbolt (display + data + webcam + sound)

They could then put a usb 3.0 hub on the cinema display and 2 other thunderbolt ports on it for other stuff you want to let plugged in.

It will then be truly "magical" docking station ish solution.
 
They'll still be around as workstations, but very few people will be buying new PC's in the traditional desktop form factor by the end of this decade. The laptop has already replaced the desktop as the most popular form factor. Tablets and smartphones will continue to crowd the desktop (and even the traditional laptop) out of the market.

The PC gaming market is still bigger than Apple's world wide market share, so PCs will continue to have a place significantly longer than Apple or Apple fans would like to have you believe.

And outside of the PC gaming market, theres plenty of people who still prefer a traditional desktop PC over anything else because of price, speed, and expandability. There isn't another device on the planet that can currently match a desktop PC in any of those ways.

Yeah, laptops are "more popular" and sell more than desktops, but only by a few percentage points. You're greatly overlooking the fact that desktop PCs still sell in the tens of millions every year and will continue to do so for years and years to come.

I love newegg, but what's happening there is indicative only of the very tiny geek marketplace - less than 5% of the PC industry as a whole.

Proof? Even so, thats still larger than Apple's world wide market share.

That's nice. But with Thunderbolt you don't need a desktop PC to take advantage of desktop peripherals, like high-end graphics cards or external accelerators. In fact, you could plug a Thunderbolt-equipped tablet - or even a smartphone - into an expansion box and take advantage of desktop-class graphics and storage hardware.

rofl! Desktop GPUs tend to use PCIe 2.0 x16, so you're looking at 8GB/sec (64Gbits) of bandwidth. More than 3x that of Thunderbolt in "dual channel" mode. PCIe 3.0 is good for 16GB/sec. An SLI or Crossfire GPU setup is pushing 16GB/sec.

What about power? Thunderbolt provides 10 watts of power. So any external GPU thats already being slowed down by Thunderbolt will require its own power supply, since a modern desktop GPU can easily eat a couple hundred watts of electricity.

You won't. Which is why the desktop as we've known it is on its way to becoming virtually extinct.

Not if bandwidth is a concern. Again, as I pointed out, when it comes to desktop GPUs, Thunderbolt doesn't even provide 1/3 of the required modern bandwidth. PCIe 3.0 doubles what is currently available.

For external storage, USB 3.0 pairs perfectly with SATA3 internal HDDs.

Funny how i have never seen a computer with USB3, not that they don't exist just aren't very common.

Then you need to look harder. OEMs were selling systems with USB 3.0 last year, and I've been building systems with USB 3.0 ports since last year. I had friends buying notebooks with USB 3.0 last year.

Again read above, your eSATA argument is weak eSATA was only a minor improvement over Firewire

Minor improvement? eSATA started out at almost double the bandwidth of Firewire 800. Thats more than a "minor improvement".

Plain old wrong, i have a SATA 3 drive in my computer right now.

Plain old wrong, you do not. You're confusing SATA naming with speeds. SATA 3 = 6.0Gbps. SATA 2 (which Apple uses) is 3Gbps. Apple uses SATA 2 controllers in some computers. In fact, if you do some searching in this forum, you'll see that Apple actually went so far as to use SATA 1 controllers in some MacBook "Pro" systems after using SATA 2 the previous generation.


Prove it!

Display port is a superior standard to HDMI and why have both display port and HDMI when you can get HDMI from the display port?

HDMI 1.4 offers higher resolutions than the most recent DisplayPort revision, offers more audio bandwidth (HDMI 1.3 still offers more audio bandwidth), and offers up to 10Gbps of data. Granted, DisplayPort offers more data, but HDMI still supports higher resolutions, more audio bandwidth, etc.

Blu ray is gaining market share but not as much as Online download. Blu ray drives are big and require power i would much rather have that go towards a second HD.

Are you serious? Really? Online services outpacing blu-ray? I don't think so. It's difficult to find numbers, but NPD states that blu-ray and DVD still own "the vast majority of the market" and blu-ray owns 23.86% of that market.

And with half of all US internet connections capped, streaming video is going to hit a wall pretty quick. Plus theres the issue of quality. There is not a single streaming service out there that even comes close to resembling the quality of blu-ray disc.

HDMI has absolutely no advantages over Display port (I wonder why professionals use Display port?), the latest HDMI is comparable to Display port however the Display port standard is due for update which will up the ante again. Also Display port can have longer cables, better signal over longer distances and another advantage which is stuck on the tip of my tongue.

Someone needs to do some research. Again, HDMI offers higher resolution, more audio bandwidth, etc.

You really want another port on the Macbook Pro, Apple would never drop Firewire for eSATA (their professional market).

Don't start with that. Apple doesn't support "professional" markets at all. Their systems are consumer grade systems that have nothing in common with true "professional" systems from HP, Lenovo, Dell, etc.

I would never call the Mac a niche product, it is slowly gaining on Microsofts Monopoly which actually on happened because of Apple. Microsoft practically stole the GUI from Apple, Apple took them to court where it was ruled the GUI could not be patented.

:rolleyes: And Apple stole that GUI from Xerox!

Still as far as i know Xerox didn't actually have a working GUI?

Then you know wrong.

USB connection is god awful.

Speed's are diabolical.

Only in OS X thanks to Apple's terrible USB support.

Who cares about HP? It's the graphics card makers who will be looking to licence thunderbolt, so they can get another big sales point and take over a bigger slice of the PC build components.

Again, why? Thunderbolt is SIGNIFICANTLY slower than PCIe 2.0 x16 and light years behind PCIe 3.0 x16.

While not the same thing, but back in the day there was the sony betamax vs. vhs. betamax was better in its quality of video.

Except for that pesky fact that Beta could only hold about an hour of video in its first revision, where a VHS tape could hold an entire 2 hour movie. People seem to forget that.

For professional usages
- game production [my industry],

As I've stated many times, how? Thunderbolt offers less than 1/3 the bandwidth of the current standard in use for GPUs. PCIe 3.0 x16 will double that.

- backup of large amounts of data daily

Apple uses SATA 2 HDDs and SSDs, so you'd be fine with USB 3.0.

The Post-PC era has just begun.

I like my iPad, despite the fact that its useless beyond being an expensive and horribly slow web browser. However, this "Post PC" nonsense needs to stop. PCs aren't going anywhere. "Post PC" products have a VERY long way to go before they can replace a PC. Even if they have finally caught up in processing power, until I can replace components myself, a PC will always have a place.

PCs are not going anywhere. A $200 smartphone outselling PCs is NOT the sign of the death of the PC because an iPhone or iPad is a completely different device and severely limited in comparison.

Hewlett Packard Not Convinced on the Value of Industrial Design

Thats funny, because Apple's 2008 "unibody" designs were actually ripoffs of HP's then old designs.

Hewlett Packard Not Convinced on the Value of Product Differentiation

Which is why every single Apple product looks EXACTLY the same? Which is why HP actually offers various color, pattern, and design options for their products?

You could have 100 people buy a 15" MacBook "Pro" and every single one will look the same, minus the option for a matte screen. You could have a 100 different people buy HP's 15" products and theres a good chance that the products wouldn't repeat.

Hewlett Packard Not Convinced on the Value of User Satisfaction

Which is why HP is the largest computer manufacturer in the world?

Hewlett Packard Not Convinced on the Value of Quality Construction

Which is why Apple's plastic machines have a long history of cracking and discoloring? Which is why Apple's metal products are known for their ability to dent, scratch, warp, bend?
 
HDMI wasn't designed for PC Monitors, It's a home theater sepc.
Display port is the way forward in this area.

Why, if Display Port is inferior to HDMI in some important areas?

Or, why not support the latest revisions of both - even if it means adding a tiny port to the computer?
 
HDMI 1.4 offers higher resolutions than the most recent DisplayPort revision, offers more audio bandwidth (HDMI 1.3 still offers more audio bandwidth), and offers up to 10Gbps of data. Granted, DisplayPort offers more data, but HDMI still supports higher resolutions, more audio bandwidth, etc.
.
.
.
Someone needs to do some research. Again, HDMI offers higher resolution, more audio bandwidth, etc.

HDMI 1.4 does NOT offer higher resolution than dp
http://www.tested.com/news/deciding-dvis-succesor-hdmi-14a-vs-displayport-12/1191/

dp also offers nearly 2x as much data transfer as hdmi....
 
Why, if Display Port is inferior to HDMI in some important areas?

Or, why not support the latest revisions of both - even if it means adding a tiny port to the computer?

It's not inferior. The previous poster commented that HDMI offers higher resolution, without mentioning the refresh rate.

Display port is much more relevant for computers when it comes to the data the standard can carry. It's much more than just a video signal.
 
Rather bad arguement, a TB cable would have different wiring than USB 3... in the case of Sony's implimentation, you would still need a different type of cable... now you'd be stuck with several cables that look similar but aren't and figuring out where the cable is for the right device.

Also, who wants to waste their only available TB port with a USB 1.1 device? I'd say leave Thunderbolt ports seperate from USB. They have different, non-competing uses.

Thunderbolt is basically PCI-E made available outside the computer.

So if you had a desktop computer with plenty of PCI-E slots, you would buy a PCI-E card to supply USB 3. With Thunderbolt, someone could just create an adapter that has the functionality of the same PCI-E card, just in much smaller space. Well, to the end user it would be an "adapter". In reality, it would be a PCI-E card, except that it connects to the PCI-E cables inside the Thunderbolt cable, not the PCI-E in your computer.

If you carry your MacBook with you quite often, and sometimes you put it on the desk and then plug in a monitor and half a dozen USB-2 devices, then having an adapter that provides half a dozen USB-2 ports would be nice - all you'd have to do now would be to put the MacBook on your desk and plug in one Thunderbolt cable. (The difference between this and an ordinary USB-2 hub is that a USB-2 hub connects to _one_ USB-2 port in your computer and has 480 MBit/sec bandwidth total for all devices; a USB-2 Thunderbolt adapter could provide half a dozen separate USB ports with 480 MBit/sec _each_. )
 
so if i buy a computer now, it shouldn't have a port for things that aren't out YET? (but are coming out)

how lame would that be--you just buy a computer but you miss out on a great port because they didn't include it until the drives came out

lame and short sighted

That's when the definition "future proof" kicks in.

The only thing thunderbolt mens, is the capacity to connect external PCI Express devices. Quite different than USB3.

When people start talking about TB beating USB3, or the other way around, it sounds to me like if because external HDDs devices exist, then pendrives are doomed, or the other way around, when in reality both coexist.

TB and USB3 will coexist, because they are meant for different things. TB is orientated towards the professional segment, and USB3 to the consumer one. At least in the initial phase.

Regarding HP, well, their desktops are really good. But I think they still produce towers with floppy disk drives, so....
 
Thunderbolt is basically PCI-E made available outside the computer.

So if you had a desktop computer with plenty of PCI-E slots, you would buy a PCI-E card to supply USB 3. With Thunderbolt, someone could just create an adapter that has the functionality of the same PCI-E card, just in much smaller space. Well, to the end user it would be an "adapter". In reality, it would be a PCI-E card, except that it connects to the PCI-E cables inside the Thunderbolt cable, not the PCI-E in your computer.

If you carry your MacBook with you quite often, and sometimes you put it on the desk and then plug in a monitor and half a dozen USB-2 devices, then having an adapter that provides half a dozen USB-2 ports would be nice - all you'd have to do now would be to put the MacBook on your desk and plug in one Thunderbolt cable. (The difference between this and an ordinary USB-2 hub is that a USB-2 hub connects to _one_ USB-2 port in your computer and has 480 MBit/sec bandwidth total for all devices; a USB-2 Thunderbolt adapter could provide half a dozen separate USB ports with 480 MBit/sec _each_. )

I did not buy a "pro" computer to deal with adapters. Also, many people with a ton of USB devices would not buy a macbook with two USB 2.0 ports. If that was such a high priorty they would have used a laptop pc with 4 USB 3.0 ports.

Now true, I see your point, however, it would kind of suck if that thunderbolt port died.
 
I'm shocked at most people on here. I don't think people realize the importance of thunderbolt/light peak. Thunderbolt surpasses USB 3.0 by far. Thunderbolt technology has the capacity to theoretically reach speeds higher than 1 terabyte/sec in the future. There is no need for those kinds of speeds now, but as our standard increases each year, we will need something that fast. USB won't hold up to that. The sooner we adopt thunderbolt the less headache we will have later when people find out they need to switch from USB to thunderbolt because it simply can't keep up. HP is only delaying the inevitable.
 
My bet?? .. Thunderbolt will win :)

It will be a deja vu all over again like 2008. You know ..

Bluray vs HD-DVD
:D

Introduction​
ANALOGY:

Let´s use this analogy. Bluray is like Thunderbolt .. it´s better, it has much more potential. It was dreaded at the beginning. Bluray sucks and all that things. Sony made the bold move by implementing it on their PS3 while no other device have it.

Even Microsoft that state they support HD-DVD didnt have the courage to implement it to their XBox360 as standard, they sold it as separate drive. Why? Were they scared?

SIMILARITY:
Now only Apple implement TB port on their product, no other PC manufacturer feels challenged to follow, even when TB actually supported by and engineered by Intel

Conflict​
ANALOGY:

HD-DVD was promised to be the next gen of DVD, slightly worse than Bluray but cheaper to implement, so many consumers support it instead, it feels like continuation to DVD, a thing that they familar with for decades already. The market was bigger and people praise HD-DVD (for a while)

SIMILARITY
USB3 is the next gen of USB2, but it perform worse than the new Thunderbolt. People love USB more because it´s more common, they´ve known USB for like 13 years or so

Ending​
ANALOGY:

Movie industry was more inclined for Bluray, it was better, why pick something worse and smaller if Bluray is better? Yeah it was more expensive due to little market support, but they´ll come cheaper and cheaper when many people use them. So they pick Bluray, Toshiba given up their HD DVD support, and here we are enjoying Bluray on Playstation3 (Hero of Bluray) and BD players, which are plenty and cheaper now.

SIMILARITY:

Computer industry will be inclined to Thunderbolt, why pick USB, which is worse (even it´s something we have been familiar with for a long time)?

USB3 will be abandoned, and Thunderbolt will be standard. And people (only a few I´m sure) who used Macbook Pros and iMac with Thunderbolt from DAY 1 will remember. They made the right choice, and they have Thunderbolt already for a long long time. Patience always good.


See something wrong here? Come on USB people, let´s discuss here, I´m all ears :cool:
 
Blu-ray was chosen for its DRM.

There was no consumer consideration in the decision.

I know, that´s why I wrote movie industry inclined to them, I didnt say consumers chose them, in fact consumers dreaded them.

Yet here we are enjoying the awesomeness.

Thunderbolt has more choice and potential, it can implement more feature and security
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

X38 not convinced of the value of Hewlett Packard.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.