Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's not that long ago that string theory was considered a crackpot idea. Now it's pretty much accepted as the basis of particle physics. People shouldn't be so keen to dismiss a hypothesis because the evidence for it isn't available YET. Who knows what future experiments will reveal as conundrums needing to be solved?

I'm not sure it's that clear. It is currently the best funded research but so far there is no proof. There are competing theories (loop quantum gravity primarily) that are just as likely to be proven.
 
It's not that long ago that string theory was considered a crackpot idea. Now it's pretty much accepted as the basis of particle physics. People shouldn't be so keen to dismiss a hypothesis because the evidence for it isn't available YET. Who knows what future experiments will reveal as conundrums needing to be solved?

Breath of fresh air right there. He used hypothesis and theory right! ;)

----------

I'm not sure it's that clear. It is currently the best funded research but so far there is no proof. There are competing theories (loop quantum gravity primarily) that are just as likely to be proven.

There is never proof in science. There is always observable evidence and repeatable experimentation that yields the same results, but never definitive proof.
 
Wirelessly posted

Boson, smoson. Now, if they'd discovered a bison in the Collider, that would be something!

Personally, I find the whole thing a drag.

:eek:

+1 for understanding, and it keeps the scientists off the streets.

Cheers,
OW
 
No, it doesn't. Mostly because it isn't an issue thanks to the laws of physics.

That's exactly what my point about the paradigm was....In the highly unlikely event of a black hole being created in lab conditions, the paradigm and the laws of Physics on which it is based would have to be re-written...Probability? 0 I think.. I'm reading " A Brief History Of Time" for the third time...:)
 
Last edited:
There is never proof in science. There is always observable evidence and repeatable experimentation that yields the same results, but never definitive proof.

Indeed. I should have said LQG is as likely to be give rise to testable predictions and predict the results of valid experiments correctly.
 
It has no impact on me, its a sub atomic particle that's interesting as it confirms a theory but in the scheme of things, I have more important things to worry about, like when will my retina MBP will arrive :cool:

You never know how this can effect your life. If it wasn't for the theory of relativity we would not have GPS. Although it was a whole heck of a lot cheaper to confirm.

Hopefully the finding of this particle will pay off the $13.25 billion spent to find it somewhere down the line. Who knows what tech it could lead towards. Even just building the collider has likely spawned all sorts of new materials, magnets and sensors that can one day filter down to larger marketplaces.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.