You guess we will?
Not really sure why you're asking, but yes.
there isn't that much gold in there though...
Nor is there in plenty of other gold watches and jewelry that costs much more for the gold version.
You guess we will?
there isn't that much gold in there though...
I think the watch must be plated because the price of gold varies per day so it would be hard for Apple to lock in a price for a whole year unless they priced it at the highest level so they wouldn't lose money if gold prices spiked upward.
Ok, I didn't think of that.Neither the Apple website, nor the back of the watch, say "plated"... which is a legal requirement if it is.
That took me aback at first, too.
Answer: the curved shot is of the wrist band buckle, not the watch.
Yes. I might also get it.
I'm hoping the gold one will be pretty cheap, hopefully cheap enough to justify the fact that it will be completely useless in two-three years.
But it really seems that not that many will get it.
Many on this forum, who are usually the most ardent pro apple buyers seem uninterested for the most part.
Most watch forum users are not interested.
Many people say, I will buy it next year or something like that.
I personally think the gold watches will be way more than $1200. I am thinking more inline around $5000. It is gold after all.
People offload $3K macbooks all the time for the newer version.
Much of the value if a year-old Apple anything is any indication.
Well it's supposedly only 12.5mm.
Do you know anything about how thick watches usually are?
Certainly there should be many sport watches that are thinner but for the most part, they are not.
Panerai: thicker
Most Rolex: thicker
Most Breitlings: thicker
Most hublots: thicker
Not sure how thick APs are but I'm pretty sure most are thicker than the Apple watch.
On another note, the website shows only 6 designs for the Edition. They can always come up with a few more, but it won't be mix-and-match between the bands and the watches (if you look closely, the crown is color-matched to the band)
I would think that the crown must be exchangeable. Don't know how hard it is. You might buy a new band, and they mount it and replace the crown as well. Or it might be designed so that you can wear a different band with matching crown every day of the week.
Yellow gold = illusion of prosperity + ugly
Most people in the watch community agree, but this isn't really aimed at watch collectors.
What? How far into the keynote (hhmm)? At the 1hr 40m mark, Tim said it starts at $349, but that was all he said about pricing that I saw.
Good point. At least with a nice Swiss watch, there's some resale value in it where you can recover some of your money. But with a recently retired version, which will probably happen every 12-18 months, there's very little resale value. And if each version of the Apple Watch is leaps and bounds better than the one before it then the resale value is almost non-existent. Just like if you have a recently retired iPad or iPod, you have to sell it off quickly in order to get anything. The Apple Watch is a technology product, not a nice Swiss watch with a considerable resale market. You have vintage Swiss watches and an industry built around just that, but you will never have viable vintage Apple Watches as the interested parties will always want the latest and greatest in that product.
I'd rather stand up for equality rather than discrimination.
you mean you'd rather force your equality religion on everyone else
you mean you'd rather force your equality religion on everyone else
No kidding as well.
equality seems to be the better option than discrimination
This has nothing to do with communism. Discrimination is crime, where I live.
you mean you'd rather force your equality religion on everyone else
I've seen estimates run up to 3k or 5k for the watch in 18k gold. 1.2k is probably just for the scrap value of the gold, plus labour and hours and the fact it's "premium" I can see Apple charging in the 3-5k range for it.