I just put the computer on desk and don't turn it up down every few minutes and thus don't have to look at the bottom again and againI wish they would eliminate the atrociously designed circular bottom opening. The Mac mini should have had a full size bottom panel that would unscrew to give easy access to all the components. The circular opening made swapping out drives a completely unnecessary pain in the ass (admittedly this may be moot with how small the m1 chipset is but we'll see.
multiple m2 slots would be a-mazing!
Apple is never going to include m.2 NVMe slots in any computer they make. The slots they had until up until 2019 are all proprietary. I also doubt that the new mini will have DRAM slots either. Definitely not slots for storage.I wish they would eliminate the atrociously designed circular bottom opening. The Mac mini should have had a full size bottom panel that would unscrew to give easy access to all the components. The circular opening made swapping out drives a completely unnecessary pain in the ass (admittedly this may be moot with how small the m1 chipset is but we'll see.
An m1x Mac mini with easily accessible slots for m2 SSDs and additional RAM slots would be a huge hit (and more ports). Imagine an m1x Mac mini with four m2 (for u2) expansion slots. The low power usage combined with expandable, high-speed storage would make it a desirable server option.
The Geekbench results show the Mac mini (Late-2020) versions are faster than the Intel ones, so are they not more powerful than the Intel ones, regardless of RAM capacity?dmylrea said:
Well for one thing the Intel model can handle 64GB of main memory."The Mac mini is used for more basic tasks like video streaming, but many people use it as a software development machine, as a server or for their video editing needs. Apple knows that, so it kept the Intel model around."
So, the Intel model Mac Mini is more powerful than the M1 version? I don't understand the meaning of this...
I've been running a headless Mac mini as my iTunes library and Time Machine for years.What's a pain about running it headless? I have one that has been headless for all but initial setup.
Hmmm... I'm pretty sure Apple is one of the most opaque companies when it comes to confirming leaks, so I think Gurman was wise to not publish a date that only Apple is aware of. We'll get the official scoop in the Fall - and I definitely will be listening as I bought my in-laws a M1 mini and they can't get over what a blazing computer it is (vs 2015 15" MBP) and I definitely need something to replace my 2009 Mac Pro.I really hate that Mark Gurman has switched to ******** claims like "in the next several months" when he's too afraid to give an exact date.
Recent models of the Mini could be configured as a low end machine (i3) and mid/higher end (i5/i7) depending on your need with up to 64BG of RAM. The M1/M1x models will likely also allow a range of price and performance options. This lets the Mini be a cheap machine for those who need it or a workhorse for those who need that but don't want an integrated monitor. Some people want a simple box that can up graded without being tied to a built in monitor. This gives more flexibility. The Mini can be configured to be as high a performance as the MBP but is less expensive. The Mac Pro is really targeted at a non-consumer market so it's not even a consideration.What I don't get with Apple's strategy is who they are targeting with this. I keep hearing they target the casual user with the mini (ones that only want to surf the web, facebook, video chat) but all that can be done on their phone or a base iPad for less than half the price (not even including monitor).
If you are going to work on your Mac, you probably would get a portable to take with you or a Mac Pro if you really need to push the envelope.
To me, the only thing needed more than a phone or tablet, that does not need to be portable and doesn't need to be an extremely high end workstation is a home system that can game.
The M1 seems to be great and if the M1X adds to the gpu side, awesome. I know the M1 is better than low to mid level Intel chips (or built in GPUs)and that what people point to for a comparison to say Apple is better. You know what though? My 2018 i3 Mac mini isn't pushed hard in the games I play, but my external eGPU is maxed at all times. I can't add a video card to an M1. I can add one to just about ANY Intel system - even the small form factors - use a half height card. I bought a $399 I3 because of this a few years ago with an SSD and added in an older gaming card I traded to a friend for an old MacBook I had lying around. Apple doesn't make a system today that can match this.
Sorry long rant - I just hope Apple can add some performance in the area they are mostly lacking in instead of focusing on areas they already are strong in. Weakest link and all
Which is what will happen. The default M1X configuration will be comparable price, storage, and RAM to the latest i5 and i7 Mac mini configs.People expect a new model to replace an old model at the same price point or close to the same. As is generally what happens witupdates.
Up to 8TB SSD and up to 64GB RAM is probably going to remain the options for the(se) upper tiers.It's not that I need more power, just more storage than 2TB. The performance with the current M1 machines has been perfectly fine for what I do (High end Photoshop) but my 2TB is full already and I want more. M1X with bigger storage specs and more RAM will be spot on.
No, no, no, no, no. The current thermal headroom is great.What I’d like to see is for the mini to go on a diet. They need to fit the mini in an Apple TV shell.
Up to 8TB SSD and up to 64GB RAM is probably going to remain the options for the(se) upper tiers.
since the RAM is inside the M1 chip package, how would that work? You want the rest of us to have longer RAM latency so you can change your mind someday and upgrade your RAM?Is there any reason to believe Apple will return to user installable drives and memory?
It would be great, but this new M1X might simply be just more ports, a plexiglass top, with new locked down internals.
Good thing these are M2 models and there won't be an M1X chip.I’m doubting the case redesign rumor. Possible? Yes, but probably not going to happen before the M2 models.
I’m doubting the case redesign rumor. Possible? Yes, but probably not going to happen before the M2 models.
Which is what will happen. The default M1X configuration will be comparable price, storage, and RAM to the latest i5 and i7 Mac mini configs.
Up to 8TB SSD and up to 64GB RAM is probably going to remain the options for the(se) upper tiers.
Mind if I ask which dock you got? Do you like it? I'm thinking of getting one.Ditto. I got a TB3 dock, and with the M1 mini it gives me the extra ports that I need…DisplayPort, optical out, more USB-C & A ports.
I really hate that Mark Gurman has switched to ******** claims like "in the next several months" when he's too afraid to give an exact date.
lazy journalism, imagine if you tried that at work, hey i'll turn in the report in the next several months lol