Probably also affected by microchip crisis as anyone elseI don't think even Tim Cook knows the exact dates at this time.
Probably also affected by microchip crisis as anyone elseI don't think even Tim Cook knows the exact dates at this time.
What’s in the current chip that makes it inadequate to run iMovie in your opinion? FCP runs buttery smooth.A build your own iMac with a high-end Mini at its core would be terrific.
Give us 32mb ram, a good enough video chipset for Photoshop & iMovie, choose your own SSD, choose your own monitor, keyboard and mouse. And voila lots of happy Mac users who don't have to compromise on an iMac's limited menu.
Don't cater to the gamer, cater to the creative power user who doesn't need Mac Pro kinda juice.
As I see it, all m1 macs are the entry level, just in different form factors.I don't think Apple really considers the Mac Mini to be their "entry-level Mac" even if it is priced like one. Their entry-level Mac is the base iMac. I think Mac Mini is really more their server product and Amazon is buying up a ton of them for their in the cloud Mac OS service, that's why they introduced 10 gig ethernet to the Mac mini as well for servers.
i find it slightly odd that we might get an M1X rather than an M2 based on the A15? Or are they going to slow down the cycle and do the M2 from the A16?
I run my entire studio setup including outboard gear on a Mac Mini M1. It can handle more audio channels than my 12-core Mac Pro could. I thought the 2 TB ports would be a problem, but I've got multiple Thunderbolt 3 devices daisy chained and it works absolutely fine. Never have I had a kernel crash related to the IO I'm running, unlike the daily T2-chip drama on my previous 2018 i7 Mac Mini. (glad I got rid of that piece of ****)Because Apple started defining ‘Pro’ machines as having 1 port so now ‘high end’ just means ‘practical’
The i3 mini was a joke they overcharged for considering the mini stated at $499 when it debuted.This is not replacing the M1 mini but it’s replacing the i5/i7 mini. The mini has had 3 variants since 2018:
Mac mini i3 —> M1
Mac mini i5/i7 —> M1X
Apple came out with a “high-end” mini in 2018 and this is the replacement for that. The M1 will still be sold alongside the M1X variant. Just how the i3/i5/i7 were all sold alongside each other.
As I recall, Apple has always had several "levels" of its machines. Two processor choices two or more graphics choice, storage choices, memory choices, etc.Who said anything about "turning into"? They are just adding a higher-end version, not getting rid of the lower-end version. What's not to like about that? More choice is always better.
Why bizarre? If you can still buy the low-end M1 Mac Mini, what harm does it do if there is also a higher-end Mac Mini version? They aren't "boosting the cost", just adding another version. It's the same as before when there were different Intel configurations.
Ummmm sorry? I do believe an i7 is higher end than an i3.....Apple didn't offer a distinct higher end Mac Mini line. They had various configuration options of the same model. Some ready made with better options. They were still on the same motherboard and layout. Therefore the same model. They're all even called the Macmini8,1. It would be like considering $1,799 and $2,299 27" iMac different models instead of different options of the same model.
Apple simply discontinued the base config. Normally in the past when they dump the base config but keep the higher config available. They drop the price of that config to base. This time they didn't.
With 13" Intel MacBook Pros they offered two distinct models. Along with other lines offering distinct models. Even the 21.5" iMac had different model designations for the 1080p and 4K models.
While Apple's free to do what they want. I'd consider the M1X a distinct new line. If they're going to offer two different models going forward. Sort of a Mac Mini and Mac Mini Pro. With either the M1 or M1X being the actual replacement for the Intel model. Then we'll just have to wait and see if they'll continue with M2 + M2X lines or shift the M1X price down and offering an M2 at the higher price point.
I am glad nothing much happened at WWDC this year. Hopefully that means the next operating systems on all products will be more stable than their track record the last few years have been.After the WWDC nothing-burger, I'll believe it when Apple announces it. I'll get by with my M1 mini and Windows desktop until the M1X stuff comes out. I'd be fine with a large iMac or an M1X mini. If the M1X mini isn't enough, then I'll use the M1X mini along with the M1 mini. I'm pretty sure that the M1X mini with 32 GB or 64 GB of RAM will be enough and I can give my M1 to my wife to replace her 2018 mini i3.
When I last looked at Synology, they did not have DAS (Direct Attached Storage) like QNAP and Drobo. Has this changed? The USB ports on my NAS are only for external drives and things NOT to connect to a computer unfortunately.I'm looking at the Synology stuff now. interesting how far they have come.
Depending on the pricing I think I might pick up an M1X Mac Mini plus an M1 MacBook Air for the price of a 16”MBP.I felt that the Mac Mini was a dying breed when you can pick up a MacBook Air that has a lot of oomph, but seems many consumers are really into the Mac Mini because of the affordability, power, and ability to just plug things in without having to have dongles!
Now, with the upgraded processor as an option with more ports, this little machine is certainly a power house! Apple seems to understand this market very well and willing to give it what it needs.
i find it slightly odd that we might get an M1X rather than an M2 based on the A15? Or are they going to slow down the cycle and do the M2 from the A16?