This is what has kept me from replacing my 2012 Mini. I may just get an iMac to avoid these issues.I’d just be impressed if they can make the current M1 Mac mini wake up from sleep without needing an adapter instead of the HDMI port, or get my Magic Mouse to work on it.
So frustrated with it.
A space grey Mac mini is still not yet replace0
Yes, Apple needs a replacement Mac mini that can be configured up to $3000 like the current Intel one. The M1 Mac mini maxes out at $1800.The Intel version can have up to 64GB of RAM
It might not even be that simple. The first thing people should suspect is any rumor with a M1X thrown out there. IMHO they will be moving to a M2 with higher memory options. It was also discussed about a larger headless M2 Mac that served as low end Mac Pro compared to the larger iMac that should also use the M2. They need to get those released after the new MBP’s are finally announced. Eventually you’ll see updated Mac Mini but in a few months I doubt it when so much has not been announced.So a "Mini Pro" with the M1 Mini sticking around? My uneducated guess tells me the fall releases are for the MBPs so they get the spotlight. Everything else Mac wise is early next year.
Recently, Apple was selling both a base model i3-level Mini and a higher end one with an 6-core i7. The M1 Mini covers the base model and an M1x Mini will cover the top end. It’s not clear if Apple will call that top end Mini Pro or just keep the Mini name.Why does Apple want to turn its 'entry level' Mac into a high end one?
While this article doesn’t provide many details, this is the first rumor confirming that Apple will upgrade a Mini model with the M1x and not just leave it as an entry level product.Sometime in the future there will be new products! These type of articles dont offer anything.
How likely is it that his source would know the release date? Not very.lazy journalism, imagine if you tried that at work, hey i'll turn in the report in the next several months lol
If it is called an M1x, then probably based on the A14 core, but that doesn’t matter all that much. The A15 cores may be incrementally faster than A15 in single core processes, but overall the M1x package will be much faster. Intel Xeons are often not the fastest Intel processors in single core performance but make up for it in other ways.The bigger questions is, will this be based on A14 or A15?
The top end Mini can be configured with a 6-core i7, 64GB RAM, 4 TB/USB-C ports, and can handle up to 3 displays. The initial AS chip, M1, can’t match some of those specs so they kept the Intel one around. Once they have the M1x, it should easily out perform the Intel model."The Mac mini is used for more basic tasks like video streaming, but many people use it as a software development machine, as a server or for their video editing needs. Apple knows that, so it kept the Intel model around."
So, the Intel model Mac Mini is more powerful than the M1 version? I don't understand the meaning of this...
Gurman's the most reliable guy as he's given information directly from Apple executives. He's rarely wrong. He's not a leaker, he's a journalist with Bloomberg.
If it is called an M1x, then probably based on the A14 core, but that doesn’t matter all that much. The A15 cores may be incrementally faster than A15 in single core processes, but overall the M1x package will be much faster. Intel Xeons are often not the fastest Intel processors in single core performance but make up for it in other ways.
Inflation and a chip shortage will definitely boost the cost. The lack of supply drives up demand and the cost of production goes up.Seems bizarre to boost the cost of their so-called entry level Mac.
That said I may go Mini next as opposed to an iMac if there are additional ports - I’ll find a decent monitor to pair with it.
Not necessarily. They can add the new model as an option and keep the current one as entry level.Why does Apple want to turn its 'entry level' Mac into a high end one?
The iPhone 13 will have an M2 processor. You heard it here first. The iPhone will be the only device left with an “A” processor if they keep leave it alone.If it is called an M1x, then probably based on the A14 core, but that doesn’t matter all that much. The A15 cores may be incrementally faster than A15 in single core processes, but overall the M1x package will be much faster. Intel Xeons are often not the fastest Intel processors in single core performance but make up for it in other ways.
With sources dried up due to Apple's vigilance that link resembles the same kind of tech rumors that Forbes publish's. I guess it very challenging to be in the tech rumor business these days with our favorite topic.Being a ”journalist with Bloomberg” is hardly an indicator of reliability. This major story was repeatedly proven to be an out and out lie, for example: https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/12/supermicro_bloomberg_spying/
yep i heard that Apple devices will get refreshed with new silicon annually for the foreseeable future.BREAKING NEWS: The next generation of every Apple device is expected to launch some time in the future.