Desktops and monitors should be battery powered too, and charged by a USB C cable like MacBook Pro is.Agreed. It's a pretty design, but I *don't* want an easily-removable power cord for anything that isn't battery-powered. Phones, laptops, awesome choice. Desktop or monitor? Nope.
Exactly the reason I switched to using the mini as my main driver. Plus it let me stagger my purchases — not as much of an issue now that monitors are all so cheap, but when the monitor was an expensive peripheral, something worth considering.A monitor has a useful life that is longer than the computer attached to it. Now that Target Display Mode is gone, when the iMac becomes obsolete you have to recycle the perfectly-good monitor.
I dunno man, that will seriously impede my ability to compare it to a ham sandwich....and if it matters: just. make. the. mini. bigger. It could easily get 50% thicker and still be asked to dance at parties.
To be fair, there aren't that many with a decent PPI. There are options, but not heaps.You know Apple isn't the only one who manufactures high-end displays, right?
I'd really like more vertical redesign that takes up less desk space than the current mini.
This is a joke/sarcasm, right?Desktops and monitors should be battery powered too, and charged by a USB C cable like MacBook Pro is.
But even a 143W power supply can't provide 100W to four Thunderbolt devices. So what happens then?Well, yes and no, not having a screen means AS Mac Mini's are the absolute lowest wattage Mac's ever released, I think by itself it could be powered by a 10W usb-c mini-brick, like the one you use to charge your phone, but, and this might be the reasoning, we have USB4/Thunderbolt, so even if the machine itself sips power, you have to provide power to up to 6 devices (2 usb A, 4 thunderbolt) according to spec.
To be fair, there aren't that many with a decent PPI. There are options, but not heaps.
Even the M1 thermal throttles in a fanless machine. That's why the current Mac mini is faster than the MB Air despite having the same exact CPU.
TB3 spec is 15W max, no?But even a 143W power supply can't provide 100W to four Thunderbolt devices. So what happens then?
See! Those people are why Apple is getting rid of excess ports!Whoever created that render has never used a computer with anything plugged in, have they? Look how close the ports are.
I have no such trouble with mine. (2012 MM)Hopefully it'd at least give better BT signal strength.
My 2012 MM has a plastic Apple Logo, not sure but I think the antennas are located beneath it.Bluetooth and Wifi don't like metal.
Plexiglass is likely cheaper and more shatter resistant than a large glass panel, and you are just plopping this thing on your desk, not carrying it in a backpack everyday.
Awful design....j.k., but really, was it plexiglass or other white plastic, AFAIK it was also matte.Pssstt... I have a picture of a real world plexiglass Mac mini.
![]()
As above, no problem with mine.I like the idea of it from an aesthetic perspective.
But the mini could really use this kind of change...it's bluetooth performance is awful.
.... im not sure what you're trying to suggest here.If one wants the best of the best, then one must be willing to shell out the bucks. Same as with anything. It always amuses me when people want a top-tier product and then complain that it's expensive.
no internal heat from power brick...so even better for cooling
Same PSU as the iMac = cheaper.Separating the power supply may keep it fan-less. Which is a huge plus for some applications.
I have no problem with a separate power brick for two of my applications.
I mostly don't have problems with my 2018 - because I disconnected Wifi (it's "on" for handoff stuff, but it's disconnected from any network), but it's definitely an issue. Being able to locate the wifi and BT radios away from the USB3 ports (which can produce interference) and not behind a solid aluminium top shell would no doubt help.I have no such trouble with mine. (2012 MM)
The reason I joined MacRumors is to agitate for a portable Mac mini and portable display. Yes, I could get a battery powered M1 and screen combined in a MacBook but with major usability and speed and price compromises that make it useless for serious work and too heavy and hot and expensive for comfortable laptop use.This is a joke/sarcasm, right?
That is what I do with my power bricks. A ziptie will hold a power brick to a desk leg or an underneath cable rack. And with the mini, since you have a monitor, keyboard, ethernet, and other cables any time you move it you are going to have to redo the cable management.Who cares? It's a desktop machine. Just use some mounting tape or fasteners and mount it out of sight undernearth the desk/table. I'd much rather have a sleeker-looking machine and go through the extremely minor inconvenience of hiding the power brick.
.... im not sure what you're trying to suggest here.
There is NO WAY that iMac MagSafe design is cheaper than using the MacBook Pro PSU. And we already pay for the battery management in the M1 and MacOS, but it goes to waste with no battery.Same PSU as the iMac = cheaper.
Or I could just boot up my M1 Air and run circles around the 2009 mini.If its the 2009 version, you could max out the ram(8gb), install an SSD and you could run Big Sur on it![]()
Nice. I would under-desk mount the mini. No need to even see it.
Yes, thats right. A redesign with small changes. Sorry, english is not my native language.... so "smaller redesign"... you meant a redesign with a smaller scope of change?
I really didn't read it that way, so if that was your meaning, that's on me... I guess?