No thanks. A proprietary power supply dongle is a slap in the face for current Mini owners. I’ll stick with my 2009 Mini.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
High-End Mac Mini Said to Feature Thinner Design With 'Plexiglass' Top, Magnetic Power Port
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The 2006-2010 Mac minis had an external power supply. it was a white brick.
And as we all know the world ended for those four years.
Exactly - 3rd-party vendors will develop multi-mini power supplies for data centers. I would guess some will even offer multiple transformers for redundancy. This solution would be far more reliable than minis with internal power supplies.
I wish this already happened...
It's not very much the fault of computers, rather the hardware manufacturers that still make usb A or in some cases C-to-A accessories.
I'm in the process of switching to a full USB-C setup, but some accessories are still USB-A, like my wireless mouse, my keyboard, and others.
I think it'll take at least an other 2 years to have a full transition.
With regards to the new mac mini, I'd 100% take 6 USB-C ports (4 of which thunderbolt) and adapt where necessary, especially since I could power all my USB-A accessories with a single USB-C Hub.
Two Full power USB-C ports could potentially draw 30W Alone, Thunderbolt up to 100W.
If we assume this is a higher end Mini, the M1X / M2 (whatever) might be rated higher as well.
YAAAS Bring back the cube!!Thinner?😑😑😑 Boo...hiss... I just lost all interest in the high end Mini.
I want it 3x thicker and incased in clear acrylic. Bring back the Cube. Resistance is futile.
(nice Borg reference)
You're only considering the power consumed by an M1, yet the M1-X with more cores will likely use more power in the next Mac mini.
Also...you might not beware that USB-C is spec'd to deliver between 60 and 100 watts per port, depending on configuration and cable used. Imagine the whine-fest if it didn't hit at least 60 watts on each port, and do so when the CPU is under maximum load.
A ton of thought went into the decision to go external with the Mac mini power supply. Feel free to assert that it was due to lack of confidence in power supply reliability, rather than from a careful analysis of goals and requirements. I don't think that will get much traction.
Looking at the depth of the iMac is all it takes to see why the brick needs to be external. They wanted it very thin, and decided an external power brick was an acceptable trade-off.
I don't understand why that whooshes over so many heads. I haven't measured, but I suspect even an RJ-45 Ethernet jack would not fit, as well.
It’s also the reason the headphone jack is on the side. If one cannot fathom how a computer too thin for even a headphone Jack wouldn’t have an internal power supply, well…. 🤷♂️
When it’s a trade off they don’t agree with, it’s compromising the product.
When it’s a trade off they do agree with, its “just logical”.
Welcome to Internet Logic 101, this will be on the exam.
I’m sure you can find a way to get an LG 5K on the used market if they don’t sell them new
How exactly is it a slap in the face? Were you planning to leverage your investment in that 2009 power cord and use it for another 12 years with your new mini?
Let’s hope it’s not another failure of the aesthetic design like what they did to the new iMacs..🥲
He’s upset about the potential losses he’s gonna take in the power cord futures market.
If what they say about the connection strength is true, then I agree. The Mini is already so smol that it would come crashing off the desk if 😼someone😽 trips on the power cable. The old school magsafe was just right. It held th he plug in place, but broke away if some four legged fiend decides come barreling across your desk.
Anyhow, Ima hold off until Apple makes a machine that is upgradable. I don't want to have to replace the whole thing because a port or 2 craps out. Bad Apple.
I think its rare someone would trip or tug the cord on a desktop. They are static in one part of a room and usually backed up to a wall on a desk with the cable running down the back of a desk.
Laptops on the other hand are constantly moved around and the possibility of tripping on the cable its attached to is higher.
But the point is with Apple silicon there is nothing more to “pack in.” The Mac mini doesn't need to be big because it doesn't concern itself with battery life and it doesn't need to accommodate any kind of user swappable components.
Its size need only be defined by the size of its logic board and the thermal constraints of the SoC: there is no reason for its enclosure to be any larger than that. And, given the efficiency and size reduction that the system-on-package design of Apple silicon entails, this necessitates a shrinkage of the enclosure.
Just look at the iFixit teardown of the current M1 Mac mini, where they took the Intel-era chassis and shoved an M1 logic board inside: it's mostly empty air inside that volume. That's a waste of space and materials.
I need uncompromised performance. Laptops compromise performance, are loud under load, and cost much more. I want a light quiet cheap (low power) MacBook that connects with one cable (or wirelessly!) to a fast portable Mini. No compromises. Best of both worlds.