Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yup.... I’d rather it stayed the same size and keep a nice sized fan as well... hey ho.

I don’t want a tiny desktop only to have an external brick. Classic Apple design.

I'm ok with a external power brick on a Mac mini this size. But you are still thinking in the terms of an Intel CPU's when it comes to the fan. Even if they put a CPU with double the power of the M1 in a mini this size they would not need a big or powerful fan. It's just not needed with an ARM cpu with the power requirements we have seen so far.
 
Separating the power supply may keep it fan-less. Which is a huge plus for some applications.

I have no problem with a separate power brick for two of my applications.
As I said in an earlier post, if Apple uses GaN based components for the power stage it will not need any cooling, heck, the old mini power stage does not have active cooling AFAIK.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: stompy and 123
mac-mini-back.jpg

So, we have here 4 USB-C ports, of which only 2 can be used at the same time, given the thickness of the plugs of any peripherals worth talking about. Also, soldered RAM and SSD.
 
I'm ok with a external power brick on a Mac mini this size. But you are still thinking in the terms of an Intel CPU's when it comes to the fan. Even if they put a CPU with double the power of the M1 in a mini this size they would not need a big or powerful fan. It's just not needed with an ARM cpu with the power requirements we have seen so far.

Depends on how fast it's being clocked and the work being done. I'd rather have a faster processor and external power brick. And no fan, of any size.
 
Moot point, nowadays with GaN based components there will be a lot less heat.
again, no internal heat...24" imac vs intel one as well..you have a point with GaN..but still
You still have a cable so, irrelevant that you have a power brick as well
Inside power brick are so 90
The only mac that will use internal power brick should be the mac pro...
 
Why the crap does the Mac Mini need to change to using an external power brick? One of the nice things about the Mac Mini is its lack of such a brick.

The first iteration of the Mac Mini had one, then moved away from that. It feels like we're sliding backwards?

It's also oddly inconsistent with Apple's other design decisions. SSD - integrated. RAM - integrated. WiFi, bluetooth, GPU, all the controllers - integrate it all. Power supply? Nah, let's make that modular and external. It makes no sense.
 
It's also oddly inconsistent with Apple's other design decisions. SSD - integrated. RAM - integrated. WiFi, bluetooth, GPU, all the controllers - integrate it all. Power supply? Nah, let's make that modular and external. It makes no sense.

It can make a lot of sense for some applications where heat and fan reliability are concerns.
 
It's also oddly inconsistent with Apple's other design decisions. SSD - integrated. RAM - integrated. WiFi, bluetooth, GPU, all the controllers - integrate it all. Power supply? Nah, let's make that modular and external. It makes no sense.
It's not inconsistent. Rather, it is absolutely consistent with the entire Mac product line. The same power cable is likely going to work for all Macs...laptop and desktop.

These power adapters are easy to hide and bury under a desk or on an under-desk shelf. If it makes for a better Mac in the same or smaller footprint by offloading such a piece, that is better.
 
Lower cost to manufacture, lower material costs because of less aluminum, smaller packaging, lower shipping costs. Thats a whole lot of savings....for Apple. If it still comes with an M1 at the $699 starting price, its lame. If they can pass off the savings and put in a faster chip at that price, I will buy one just because its a good deal. If they do what they always do with ipads, introduce the model that should replace the previous years as a different model and charge more for it instead of upgrading an outdated model with a new one while keeping the same price, they can stick it up.....in the shelf again, I'll wait to buy it used and give someone else the money.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: diandi
Why should they use the magnetic power cable like on the iMac? I can understand why they did it on the iMac (>100W so no USB-C, case too thin), but they could simply use the same one like on the previous generations…
maybe because of the color matching?

Well, yes and no, not having a screen means AS Mac Mini's are the absolute lowest wattage Mac's ever released, I think by itself it could be powered by a 10W usb-c mini-brick, like the one you use to charge your phone, but, and this might be the reasoning, we have USB4/Thunderbolt, so even if the machine itself sips power, you have to provide power to up to 6 devices (2 usb A, 4 thunderbolt) according to spec.
 
I don't think MagSafe will work well with Mac mini. Considering many of these will be used in server farms, there would be no benefit but catastrophes if someone were to tug the cable a little too hard...
Agreed. It's a pretty design, but I *don't* want an easily-removable power cord for anything that isn't battery-powered. Phones, laptops, awesome choice. Desktop or monitor? Nope.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.