Very nice! Hope it comes in Space Gray!
Yup.... I’d rather it stayed the same size and keep a nice sized fan as well... hey ho.
I don’t want a tiny desktop only to have an external brick. Classic Apple design.
As I said in an earlier post, if Apple uses GaN based components for the power stage it will not need any cooling, heck, the old mini power stage does not have active cooling AFAIK.Separating the power supply may keep it fan-less. Which is a huge plus for some applications.
I have no problem with a separate power brick for two of my applications.
Might be tough to put a full 10GbE ethernet inside a power brick..If it's got the same power brick as the iMac, why would it have an ethernet port *ON* the machine itself?
I'm ok with a external power brick on a Mac mini this size. But you are still thinking in the terms of an Intel CPU's when it comes to the fan. Even if they put a CPU with double the power of the M1 in a mini this size they would not need a big or powerful fan. It's just not needed with an ARM cpu with the power requirements we have seen so far.
again, no internal heat...24" imac vs intel one as well..you have a point with GaN..but stillMoot point, nowadays with GaN based components there will be a lot less heat.
It could be because they are planning to introduce two-tone colors, like the new iMacPlexiglass (Like)...Nope...scratches too much, must be glass then, but....why, just use aluminium.
There is no reason to make the top of Plexiglass like material.
Conductive charging maybe?? Imagine how cool it would be to charge your iPhone, AirPods, and Apple Watch on top of the Mac Mini!Plexiglass (Like)...Nope...scratches too much, must be glass then, but....why, just use aluminium.
There is no reason to make the top of Plexiglass like material.
Why the crap does the Mac Mini need to change to using an external power brick? One of the nice things about the Mac Mini is its lack of such a brick.
The first iteration of the Mac Mini had one, then moved away from that. It feels like we're sliding backwards?
The render is a clown show, but the concept is great, I hope it is really coming.Looks really nice. I think the USB C ports will be spaced a little further apart than the render shows.
It's also oddly inconsistent with Apple's other design decisions. SSD - integrated. RAM - integrated. WiFi, bluetooth, GPU, all the controllers - integrate it all. Power supply? Nah, let's make that modular and external. It makes no sense.
It's not inconsistent. Rather, it is absolutely consistent with the entire Mac product line. The same power cable is likely going to work for all Macs...laptop and desktop.It's also oddly inconsistent with Apple's other design decisions. SSD - integrated. RAM - integrated. WiFi, bluetooth, GPU, all the controllers - integrate it all. Power supply? Nah, let's make that modular and external. It makes no sense.
Because this is a poor render.If it's got the same power brick as the iMac, why would it have an ethernet port *ON* the machine itself?
Why should they use the magnetic power cable like on the iMac? I can understand why they did it on the iMac (>100W so no USB-C, case too thin), but they could simply use the same one like on the previous generations…
maybe because of the color matching?
Agreed. It's a pretty design, but I *don't* want an easily-removable power cord for anything that isn't battery-powered. Phones, laptops, awesome choice. Desktop or monitor? Nope.I don't think MagSafe will work well with Mac mini. Considering many of these will be used in server farms, there would be no benefit but catastrophes if someone were to tug the cable a little too hard...