Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm ok with a external power brick on a Mac mini this size. But you are still thinking in the terms of an Intel CPU's when it comes to the fan. Even if they put a CPU with double the power of the M1 in a mini this size they would not need a big or powerful fan. It's just not needed with an ARM cpu with the power requirements we have seen so far.
I know the tdp is much less but I’d rather have a larger fan that spins slower. I guess even that is overkill for these M SoCs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EntropyQ3
Well if it has the same power brick then obviously the ethernet port won't be on the housing. Not very well thought out render.

Now if only there was a monitor besides the ridiculous $6k Pro XDR to plug this into.

There's a version of the power brick without ethernet, the ethernet port has to be on the housing, due to all the cloud computing services depending on Mac Minis for the task.
 
Plexiglass (Like)...Nope...scratches too much, must be glass then, but....why, just use aluminium.
There is no reason to make the top of Plexiglass like material.
Bluetooth and Wifi don't like metal.

Plexiglass is likely cheaper and more shatter resistant than a large glass panel, and you are just plopping this thing on your desk, not carrying it in a backpack everyday.
 
Why should they use the magnetic power cable like on the iMac? I can understand why they did it on the iMac (>100W so no USB-C, case too thin), but they could simply use the same one like on the previous generations…
maybe because of the color matching?
I suspect that if they do a redesign like this, they might also move the RJ-45 jack to the power brick like on the iMac, even though the renders for this article are showing RJ-45 on the back of the mini itself. Just a theory based on nothing.
 
There's a version of the power brick without ethernet, the ethernet port has to be on the housing, due to all the cloud computing services depending on Mac Minis for the task.
Speaking of that, Cloud Computing (or any use as servers, however small that may be at this point) might actually benefit from having an external power supply that can be swapped out in seconds rather than close to never...
 
I like the direction Apple is taking for the entry level devices. Combining the nostalgic Apple hardware design of the 90s, with the "soft" industrial design of the early 2000s, with a dash of contemporary Apple. I'm hoping the community allows these designs/designers a little room to grow. I feel they are on the right path, and personally hope we will be getting more industrial/utilitarian hardware designs with the Pro level devices.
 
Plexiglass (Like)...Nope...scratches too much, must be glass then, but....why, just use aluminium.
There is no reason to make the top of Plexiglass like material.
It's a way to make old computers look, well, old, and reduce their desirability. Apple is famous for making products that are hard to maintain, so that you don't want to buy them used, or if you do, you know that they're used.
 
no internal heat from power brick...so even better for cooling
It´s not like the M1 mac mini is suffering from cooling. Don´t really see the point in this right now other than "future proofing" the potential for something with M1X, M2 etc.
 
no internal heat from power brick...so even better for cooling
Except in reality what they will do is reduce the size of the machine and the heatsinks and fans, (should there be any). This thing may still overheat, assume that removing the largest source of heat is even more of an excuse for Apple to reduce the cooling apparatus.
'Even better for cooling' is this instance is conditional.
 
If it's got the same power brick as the iMac, why would it have an ethernet port *ON* the machine itself?
The base iMac’s power brick doesn’t include Ethernet, only the midrange and up models do. It’s more than possible Apple is simply using the same brick as the base model and keeping the Ethernet port on the Mini itself.
 
Why the crap does the Mac Mini need to change to using an external power brick? One of the nice things about the Mac Mini is its lack of such a brick.

Because:
(a) it is thinner.
(b) it is thinner
(c) it is thinner.

I know strictly speaking that is only one reason, but since making stuff thinner. for no adequately explored reason, at the expense of functionality, it is so important that it counts as three. If you don't understand why an already-tiny desktop machine has to be made even thinner please report to your local Apple re-education center.

Hopefully, this is just some speculative rumour, but unfortunately it does sound like the Apple we know and love.

Might be tough to put a full 10GbE ethernet inside a power brick..

The iFixit teardown of the iMac showed an ethernet controller chip on the main logic board. Suggesting that the new magnetic connector is just a glorified Ethernet patch cable, and the Ethernet socket in the power brick may be nothing more than a socket. $30 extra for a RJ45 socket sounds about right for Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.