I wonder how many people will really purchase the $10,000 watch. Where are the diamonds?
The kind of people that will buy this model are the celebrities that add diamonds and crap to their existing electronics. This was made with that in mind.
I wonder how many people will really purchase the $10,000 watch. Where are the diamonds?
Do you really thing that billions in profit are going to be made from the Edition watch?
It is almost certain, at least in the first 12 months. Your only talking about 1 million of them or so to get to 5 billion in profits. Interestingly, Rolex had 4.5b in total revenue last year. If Apple could pull that off it would be quite a coup.
It is almost certain, at least in the first 12 months. Your only talking about 1 million of them or so to get to 5 billion in profits. Interestingly, Rolex had 4.5b in total revenue last year. If Apple could pull that off it would be quite a coup.
You think Apple will sell 100,000 Edition watches in the first year??
So you think they'll sell a million watches at $10K+?
No I think they will sell 1 million. I don't know how long that pace will last, but I don't think 1 million in year one is some kind of huge stretch. People are way overestimating the income of people running around with $10k watches on.
----------
Yes
How many watches does Rolex sell per year?
Less than 1 million, but they are not the largest luxury watch maker. Omega has a pretty healthy lead in market share. I am also not certain it will be a long term thing for Apple, but it will be a disruption, even if it is short lived.
250k watches a quarter is fairly limited by Apple standards.
Less than 1 million, but they are not the largest luxury watch maker. Omega has a pretty healthy lead in market share. I am also not certain it will be a long term thing for Apple, but it will be a disruption, even if it is short lived.
250k watches a quarter is fairly limited by Apple standards.
----------
Actually, Rolex still leads overall. Omega just past for a single model. Still, Rolex is less than 10% of the market.
Come on man, don't be so quick to defend Apple. It is possible, even for the most profitable company in the world, to be embarrassed once in a while.
They may be eventually. But not by this.
So, I "defend" and... what do you do?
Say those things because you are a possessor of truth?
Contesting my motivations is not a persuasive argument...
A million of one model is hardly a limited edition. Personally I don't see them selling anywhere near that number of the Edition watch. If I understood Tim correctly, they're not even going to be sold in all the Apple stores.
I guess we will see. Limited quantities is hard to quantify. The sport model will probably selll 1 million on April 10th.
I Think the best looking model is the black stainless steel. (if you or anyone else is looking for gift ideas)
I wonder how many people will really purchase the $10,000 watch. Where are the diamonds?
It is not meant for people like us but someone who is rich or foolish to get this.Could be worse.
we are talking about the EXACT SAME product, from the same company. I will say it again, only massive idiots will buy this. (and please also buy my old corolla which I can cover it in gold)
People that can afford these do not care if the hardware will be outdated in a year or two. They only care about having the most expensivewatch available and the attention it will gather.
You mean people buy a $650 to $950 iPhone with with the mindset that it will last decades?
I'd say about 1%
In this regard, there is no difference to how Rolex sell their watches and how Apple are selling theirs with the Watch Edition.
Rolex produce their GMT II Master in a stainless steel case which has a much lower retail price than the same watch in a platinum or white gold case. The watch movement is the same across all of the watches, the difference in price is purely down to the materials used in making the case. The same applies to pretty much all of the watches in their range (although some like Day Dates and Sky Dwellers are only available in precious metals).
Not quite, I usually pay $600 for my iPhone and re-sell it for $200 after two years. And that is hiding a $300 subsidy. So, I am spending a net $700 every two years on a new device.No, the phone market is very different. People expect phones to only last 12-24 months, and then be worth very little or just throw them away.
Well, before the iPhone, I did not spend a net $700 every two years on a phone. I spent maybe a net $400 every four years, ie, less than a third (Really, between 1995 and 2008, I owned a total of three phones). New possibilities can cause a change in behaviour.The watch market though, people don't expect to just throw a watch away after 2 years.
All my iPhones have been in use for a total of six years each. Transferred to less demanding users over time.In my opinion, in order to purchase the steel or gold models, you'll have to be the type of person who won't care about throwing it away after 24 months, even though the exterior casing is fairly valuable.
They're using ceramic particles which is less dense per unit volume than the traditional alloys used (silver, nickel, copper, etc.) which allows them to use less gold while still maintaining the 75% needed. Great for Apple, not so good for consumers.