calculus said:Brilliant. Let's have more of this. Instead of interviewing 'experts' on the matters of the day let's just pick people at random.
I would be more inclined to actually "watch" the news than read it online if this were the case.
calculus said:Brilliant. Let's have more of this. Instead of interviewing 'experts' on the matters of the day let's just pick people at random.
Yes, I think I would too.Seasought said:I would be more inclined to actually "watch" the news than read it online if this were the case.![]()
calculus said:Brilliant. Let's have more of this. Instead of interviewing 'experts' on the matters of the day let's just pick people at random.
You've spotted the flaw in my proposal!IJ Reilly said:That's a fine idea, but given that most "experts" are already pretty random, I'm not sure it would make much difference.
calculus said:You've spotted the flaw in my proposal!
nw43 said:Hmm, wonder if they'll be giving him the job?![]()
Brize said:Shouldn't think so. In this article, Guy Goma describes his interview as 'very short':
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4774429.stm
Incidentally, the video on this page has a longer preamble than the version linked by the OP. In her introduction, the presenter, Karen Bowerman, reports that the judge 'has just ruled in favour of Apple Corps'.![]()