Shots Fired!
Shots Fired!
Anybody can use the HomePod even if you’re not thereI originally had one for order and then canceled it. for my Amazon echo, its on my account but anyone can use it when i am not home, add things to a shopping list etc. When I heard homepod lost most of its features when the main account person wasnt there is when I canceled. I travel for work and my family should be able to have full capabilities when I am not there. or at the very least give me the choice to allow them to have it...
until that happens, no thanks.
Haha, no but he should.You mean he doesn't already work for Apple?
Anybody can use the HomePod even if you’re not there
To be fair, the reviews I've read so far all praise the sound quality and most of the criticism is aimed at the limitations due to Siri and the walled garden, which realistically has been expected since the HomePod was announced.A bunch of pre-release demo reviewers touted over and over recently because they were generally-to-very favorable on the product in their demo and "first look" (not-a-review) articles, are about to be bashed and marginalized for daring to now write down tangible cons in their official reviews.
So very right last week, yet likely to become so very wrong this week. What changed?
There are some caveats to take into consideration, but "pointless" is an exaggeration. It's not hard to share playlists between Apple Music users and it's also not hard to "dislike" unwanted recommendations that show up in your account as a result of family member use of the HomePod.
How well do they do that though? That's probably the reason Apple hasn't implemented it yet.
To be fair, the reviews I've read so far all praise the sound quality and most of the criticism is aimed at the limitations due to Siri and the walled garden, which realistically has been expected since the HomePod was announced.
If you are camped entirely in Apple's ecosystem it sounds like it could be a great addition to your home, if you use products and services from other companies then you will probably be better served going elsewhere.
Let me guess how it will go: only negative or less than positive reviews will be considered real reviews. Everything else will be discounted as the person being an Apple shill not wanting to lose their early access to Apple products.If that's a review ... i had to stop halfway, because it's a nonsense.
Though, almost to a review, they praised the sound quality. And this is after using the HP in their own environments. I suppose Apple could have given them units with different speakers inside, but why, really?A bunch of pre-release demo reviewers touted over and over recently because they were generally-to-very favorable on the product in their demo and "first look" (not-a-review) articles, are about to be bashed and marginalized for daring to now write down tangible cons in their official reviews.
So very right last week, yet likely to become so very wrong this week. What changed?
I’m scratching my head why this would be surprising to anyone. Apple makes products that play nicely with other Apple products. iTunes on Windows was because most people owned a Windows PC and iTunes on the desktop was the only way to sync music to an iPod or buy music from the iTunes store. Seems to me the only reason Apple Music exists for Android is because Beats Music was already there. One can disagree with Apple’s thinking and wish Apple was more cross platform but it shouldn’t surprise anyone that they’re not.To be fair, the reviews I've read so far all praise the sound quality and most of the criticism is aimed at the limitations due to Siri and the walled garden, which realistically has been expected since the HomePod was announced.
If you are camped entirely in Apple's ecosystem it sounds like it could be a great addition to your home, if you use products and services from other companies then you will probably be better served going elsewhere.
Needs connectivity options.. how do you play your TV/Xbox/Computer sounds through it?
Seems of very limited use/purpose. Siri isn't a system seller, not sure who this is targeting. A proper "HomePod" would also have a 16:9 iPad screen to watch TV programs.
Also, non-mobile home devices should always be wired to network, instead of wireless..
Or more precisely, this is for playing Apple Music.![]()
I don’t get writing a review based on what you wanted something to be vs what it was designed to be. Apple pitched the HomePod as high quality speaker first, minimal smart assistant second and cross platform never. So yeah if you have an Android phone and Spotify account HomePod isn’t for you. Apple never said it would be. if you’re reviewing HomePod based on things Apple never promised you’re doing it wrong.Though, almost to a review, they praised the sound quality. And this is after using the HP in their own environments. I suppose Apple could have given them units with different speakers inside, but why, really?
The reviews just confirm what Apple has advertised, and what the demos demoed: That the HomePod produces excellent sound. They also confirm that Siri isn't better on the HomePod than it is on other Apple devices (but it isn't worse, so if you are satisfied with Siri that's not a negative). Finally, they point out that the HP only supports Apple Music as a built-in service, which is how Apple designed it. Nevada is not Vermont, so if you want Vermont, you probably won't like Nevada. But if you're looking for Nevada, there's no better one than Nevada. Pointing out that it isn't Vermont is only a negative to those who want it to be Vermont. I don't use Spotify, so I don't care if HomePod supports it.
It's not surprising to us as we spend a lot of time talking about Apple and it's products but the reviewers have to make it clear for everyone else.I’m scratching my head why this would be surprising to anyone.
Apple makes this. It's called the iPad Pro. You can use any number of bluetooth or Airplay speakers -- including the HomePod -- if you want better sound from it.
The HomePod isn't intended as an out-of-the-home portable product. Why would one need a screen? I have a 26", 32", 42" TV and a 100" projector screen. Most people have at least one medium to large screen. Why would they want to watch at home on an iPad screen?
I see a few deficiencies with the HomePod, but not having a screen isn't one of them. Hopefully that never happens. That would truly be a Jump The Shark moment.
I agree with you about Apple never promising x and y. But a review is for potential buyers, not for Apple, and potential buyers are likely to be looking at HomePod vs Amazon Echo vs Sonos vs Google Home. Pointing out where Apple is weak compared to other smart speakers is not doing it wrong. Nor is pointing out where Apple is strong doing it wrong, even if it's something the competition isn't currently striving for.I don’t get writing a review based on what you wanted something to be vs what it was designed to be. Apple pitched the HomePod as high quality speaker first, minimal smart assistant second and cross platform never. So yeah if you have an Android phone and Spotify account HomePod isn’t for you. Apple never said it would be. if you’re reviewing HomePod based on things Apple never promised you’re doing it wrong.
Still available for delivery on Friday. Store p/u on Friday still available at BestBuy -- at least the stores near me. Store p/u cut off is likely due to logistics, not availability.