No, but it's common sense.
There is no way that Apple invests so heavily in Lossless and Spatial Audio and doesn't come out with an amazing high-fidelity follow up to HomePod.
Lol, it’s far from common sense. You seem so sure about it, but the rumor mill isn’t backing you up on this.
I think it’s perfectly clear that Apple has no immediate plans for a HomePod successor. Maybe next year or in a few years, but nothing on the horizon.
If there was a replacement due this year or early next, they’d keep production of the current unit going just to keep supply. You don’t discontinue a product only to replace it a few months later. That is not how Apple operates.
They didn’t discontinue their 2013 Mac Pro in 2017 and introduce a new one 2 years later, they kept the old (poor value) machine around until it’s replacement was ready to go.
If Apple was genuinely SERIOUS about audio, why would they release a $550 set of headphones knowing full well that their upcoming lossless streaming service won’t work with them?
I see Apple focusing on the HomePod mini for the immediate future. The OG HomePod is dead, not on “pause” it will receive software updates and support, that’s it.
They may re-enter the OG HomePod price point with a rumored Apple TV/HomePod or HomePod with screen, but the original design goals and principles that were applied to the original HomePod failed and won’t be tried again, at least not at the production costs and retail price.
HomePod mini is dirt cheap to make (compared to the OG) and horribly overpriced for its competitors in its size class, but the magic $99 price point makes it a hit.
HomePod mini has a small cheap speaker and singular amplifier IC. Original HomePod has 8 amplifiers (7 for each tweeter and 1 for the woofer), and 8 speaker drivers.
The costs of speaker drivers and amplifier ICs alone for the original model probably costs more than the entire HomePod mini does to make.