Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I agree with streaming music being so liberating - I listen to so much more music than I used to. But I do this with Sonos/Spotify.

And that's awesome, more power to you. Doesn't matter if its on Sonos or HomePod, all that great music delivered in such a personal way, it's just magical.

I went the in the Apple Music direction because I had built 15 years worth of iTunes data and listening behavior that I knew Apple Music would make the best of and get me to that "no dud songs" nirvana quickly. When I look at my HomePod, I don't see a 'speaker'. I see a mini system with 50 million songs in it. Got one in the bedroom, one in the bathroom, one in the basement, one in the dining room. Bought a cute ballistic nylon case, I bring one with me when we travel. My kids have 2 of them in their college dorms and apartments. Quite a miracle.
 
Not sure why HomePod gets put in your doghouse when its behaving just like any classic Apple product with its walled garden approach. Macs can't run Windows elegantly, Apple TV isn't available as a native app on my Sony TV, iPhone can't run Android apps, HomePod is just more of same. In reading your posts, it seems you don't like The Man telling you what you can and can't listen to or how you can or can't make payments. Apple doesn't seem like a good fit.

As for me, the HomePod is my personal liberator, it finally got me away from physical media including my MP3 collection. I've uploaded all my boots, imports, rarities, obscure pressings up to Apple Music, use my voice to tell Siri what to play, and I don't need any big ol' stereo systems in my life anymore. Apple Music in the home, Apple Music in the car, Apple Music as I travel, it's fantastic. I'm discovering more new music and listening to more old music this way. HomePod + Apple Music has been the best thing to happen to me from a musical standpoint since I bought my first CD player back in 1984.

This isn't a matter of not wanting to be dictated to by Apple, because to some degree we are all dictated to by manufacturers - it's an inescapable part of life. But I have very specific needs from products I buy, and those needs are generally not met by HomePod, despite the fact that I hoped otherwise when it was clear that Apple were planning to open the ecosystem in precisely the way I was in need of.

And they did, and while it was frustrating because Siri is not a competent enough platform to be the sole interface for anything, for a time it worked acceptably and I was quite happy. Then it didn't, and there wasn't a way to find out why not, or what I could try instead.

This is, in itself, an issue with the way Apple implement this technology, because while Amazon provides an app and a web interface to interact with Alexa, initiate commands with taps or clicks, and provide feedback and voice training, Apple don't. For this reason I don't use Siri on my iPhone, iPad, Apple TV, CarPlay or anywhere else - for me, Siri just doesn't work at all well, and there isn't an option to help improve that. But while I can use everything else more than satisfactorily without Siri, of course there isn't a choice with HomePod.

In the broader sense, it isn't a simple question of 'the walled garden', because Homepod's garden is tiny and narrow, while every other Apple product in the ecosystem has access to a much broader resource of services and systems, so no, HomePod is anything but 'more of the same'. If it were, either everything else Apple touches would be failing because they're hopeless, or more probably, HomePod would be flourishing, because Apple's vision in the wider sense is generally excellent.

I didn't doubt for one minute after reading prior posts of yours in this thread that you find HomePod a great success, and that's excellent - I'm pleased for you. In how you describe it, you are pretty much their perfect HomePod customer, and for them, and for you, that is also excellent.

But, that isn't how it has worked for Apple and the broader customer base - otherwise HomePod would not have been discontinued without a followup product ready to launch. And it isn't how it worked for me either, sad to say. And characterising anyone who has problems adopting a technology as being the problem themselves rather than that the technology simply doesn't work appropriately for them is not a great help.
 
Apple is transitioning to a new HomePod Pro in 2022 or 2023. Due to supply chain issues putting pressure on factories and component producers, its going to wait a year or two. ....

No, this is nonsense. Firstly and most importantly, nobody outside a small number of executives within Apple have an actual clue what their plans are, and even seasoned guessers are not saying this.

Secondly, as has already been said a few times, there is absolutely no good business reason to wait to produce a new product in a market place that is already ahead of Apple's game.

Thirdly, Apple is a huge company with supply chains reaching in hundreds of directions. Suppliers have factories ready to roll in production of anything they are paid to produce, so there is absolutely no reason to pause one product in favour of others. Nor have Apple in the modern era (meaning, their supply chain genius, Tim Cook, at the helm of the entire company) ever done this, or shown any sign of it. Indeed, as can be seen by the fact they are ramping down iPhone 12 mini production, the only reason they do this is because a product is not selling as well as anticipated.

Fourthly, with the R&D costs, manufacturing overheads and corporate reputation on the line, if there was any way to practically maintain HomePod production and sales, they would. Halting HomePod production in favour of a $99 mini which is an inferior product sonically, is the nearest thing to a public admission of a product failure that Apple does.
 
I hope you guys aren't doing more than pulling botjames' chain. A guy with that signature is defined by what he owns (and apparently how much he paid). He'll never admit that his HomePod wasn't delivered by angels, no matter what the circumstances. Definitely toy with him, since he dug himself such a deep hole the past year over the HomePod, but for your sanity's sake, please don't take the discussion seriously.
 
No, this is nonsense. Firstly and most importantly, nobody outside a small number of executives within Apple have an actual clue what their plans are, and even seasoned guessers are not saying this.

Certainly. But audio is Apple's growth area and Apple's wheelhouse. Its silly to think that they would launch a $549 AirPods Max and ignore a proven $200 to $250 speaker segment. Its too easy.

Secondly, as has already been said a few times, there is absolutely no good business reason to wait to produce a new product in a market place that is already ahead of Apple's game.

Sure there is. The next big moment in Apple Music is speculated rather convincingly to be Apple Music HD, a lossless premium paid tier. At that time it makes perfect sense to launch the HomePod HD, a new and improved HomePod at $249 or $199.

Thirdly, Apple is a huge company with supply chains reaching in hundreds of directions. Suppliers have factories ready to roll in production of anything they are paid to produce, so there is absolutely no reason to pause one product in favour of others.

Confluence of three things: 1. HomePod Mini just released, 2. Entire Macbook line converting to M1 architecture, 3. Pandemic causing supply chain chaos. The whole world is struggling to ship product on time. It makes perfect sense for Apple to de-prioritize niche products right after the holiday shopping season, they're not even having a March keynote.

Fourthly, with the R&D costs, manufacturing overheads and corporate reputation on the line, if there was any way to practically maintain HomePod production and sales, they would. Halting HomePod production in favour of a $99 mini which is an inferior product sonically, is the nearest thing to a public admission of a product failure that Apple does.

HomePod is a niche product, a $350 mono streaming speaker. By all accounts those of us who wanted one, have one, multiples in fact. And it suffered from unfair criticism over it being too expensive for a "personal assistant". Letting some time pass is a good thing, will help Apple elevate its reputation as it should have from the beginning. And if HomePod was a such huge dud as some wish to believe, Apple wouldn't have spent the R&D on Mini; they'd have just run away from the segment entirely, and released a $30 Siri HomeKit hockey puck like everyone else has.
 
...But audio is Apple's growth area ....

On the basis of even more complete nonsense, and a distinct lack of comprehension, I'm done.

But, when you get appointed as Apple's next CEO, as clearly you will with this degree of knowledge, I may beg a new Mac from you. Expect an email at the very least when it happens.
 
I hope you guys aren't doing more than pulling botjames' chain. A guy with that signature is defined by what he owns (and apparently how much he paid). He'll never admit that his HomePod wasn't delivered by angels, no matter what the circumstances. Definitely toy with him, since he dug himself such a deep hole the past year over the HomePod, but for your sanity's sake, please don't take the discussion seriously.

Well, even chain-pulling gets tedious in the end!
 
@boltjames... Most of the Keynote for the HomePod was touting its audio engineering and capabilities. The Siri/HomeKit portion was second. The market was, however, expecting smart assistant capabilities with this device because the smart home segment was booming. Blaming the smart assistant portion of the HomePod for its demise is absolutely ridiculous. I’d bet anything it would’ve failed even sooner if this brand new shiny, expensive speaker couldn’t at least do what a cheap Alexa and Google speaker could, like make a phone call or yes, turn on lights. Perhaps Apple should’ve started with an entry level smart speaker and worked their way up but they don’t cater solely to the entry level market. They’re known to be a premium tech brand.
 
On the basis of even more complete nonsense, and a distinct lack of comprehension, I'm done.

Outside of iPhone, Music is Apple's biggest growth opportunity. Mac has been stagnant at 7% market share forever, Apple TV is slow, iPad is iPad. AirPods, HomePods, and Apple Music is what's growing.

But, when you get appointed as Apple's next CEO, as clearly you will with this degree of knowledge, I may beg a new Mac from you. Expect an email at the very least when it happens.

Learn to use Apple Music.
 
Last edited:
@boltjames... Most of the Keynote for the HomePod was touting its audio engineering and capabilities. The Siri/HomeKit portion was second. The market was, however, expecting smart assistant capabilities with this device because the smart home segment was booming.

The media is always looking to pounce on any Apple hiccup and the YouTubers all created nonsense content painting HomePod as a weak personal assistant. Very few focused on the sound quality. And since we have a parrot culture, that stigma stuck and you've got people talking down to HomePod on those same foolish grounds today.

Blaming the smart assistant portion of the HomePod for its demise is absolutely ridiculous.

I don't blame the smart assistant portion of the HomePod for its demise- the reason for that is that HomePod was built to be a $349 product and it appears that mass consumers only want to buy it if it's below $300.

What I do blame the smart assistant for is the bad press. It's funny that the $249 AirPods Pro and the $549 AirPods Max have identical HomeKit and Siri functionality as HomePod but they don't get slammed as a weak "personal assistant" in YouTube videos and the like. Rather unfair.

Perhaps Apple should’ve started with an entry level smart speaker and worked their way up but they don’t cater solely to the entry level market. They’re known to be a premium tech brand.

Apple should have released a $349 HomePod and a $49 SiriPod at the exact same time. Tout the cheap one as the Alexa / Google smart assistant competitor, tout the expensive one as a best-in-class Apple Music accessory. Because that's what HomePod is. Spotify doesn't make an ass-kicking audio system. Nor does Tidal, Pandora, or the rest of them. Apple created a fully-integrated Apple Music streaming system. Its remarkable.
 

"What I do blame the smart assistant for is the bad press. It's funny that the $249 AirPods Pro and the $549 AirPods Max have identical HomeKit and Siri functionality as HomePod but they don't get slammed as a weak "personal assistant" in YouTube videos and the like. Rather unfair."


But people buy smart speakers for the convenience of being able to ask for something to be done as well as listening to music without having to wear headphones or press buttons. Your comparison as to why doesn't the AirPods Pro or Max get the same heat that Homepod did just doesn't make sense as they have a different use case. Most people using AirPods are only going to use Siri to skip etc. If they don't own a smart speaker and want to use Siri they don't suddenly pick up their AirPods and ask Siri to turn the lights on as that's not what they're really designed for, HomePod on the other hand is sitting in your room ready and waiting for handsfree (and headphone free) commands, and as such it has the same function as it's rivals which is why it took a kicking when it's just not up to the same standard in that respect, but also has a far higher entry fee.
Apple also restricting what services can be used with it whilst allowing Apple Music on the cheaper rival speakers also didn't help, especially when said cheaper smart speakers have line out included, therefore you can happily use Apple Music with a better smart assistant having spent £30 on a cheaper smart speaker hooked up to an existing decent home system....
 
The media is always looking to pounce on any Apple hiccup and the YouTubers all created nonsense content painting HomePod as a weak personal assistant. Very few focused on the sound quality. And since we have a parrot culture, that stigma stuck and you've got people talking down to HomePod on those same foolish grounds today.



I don't blame the smart assistant portion of the HomePod for its demise- the reason for that is that HomePod was built to be a $349 product and it appears that mass consumers only want to buy it if it's below $300.

What I do blame the smart assistant for is the bad press. It's funny that the $249 AirPods Pro and the $549 AirPods Max have identical HomeKit and Siri functionality as HomePod but they don't get slammed as a weak "personal assistant" in YouTube videos and the like. Rather unfair.



Apple should have released a $349 HomePod and a $49 SiriPod at the exact same time. Tout the cheap one as the Alexa / Google smart assistant competitor, tout the expensive one as a best-in-class Apple Music accessory. Because that's what HomePod is. Spotify doesn't make an ass-kicking audio system. Nor does Tidal, Pandora, or the rest of them. Apple created a fully-integrated Apple Music streaming system. Its remarkable.
Siri has been criticized for a very long time and again, HomePod was the only device advertised as being a smart home/HomeKit speaker.

Nobody was criticizing the sound of the HomePod. It was always praised by all the YouTube reviewers. Siri, price and lack of features were the issue.

A SiriPod at the same time as the HomePod would’ve shut the HomePod down in its tracks on the spot. Wouldn’t have lasted the three years that it did. That’s basically what the Mini just did to it.
 

"What I do blame the smart assistant for is the bad press. It's funny that the $249 AirPods Pro and the $549 AirPods Max have identical HomeKit and Siri functionality as HomePod but they don't get slammed as a weak "personal assistant" in YouTube videos and the like. Rather unfair."


But people buy smart speakers for the convenience of being able to ask for something to be done as well as listening to music without having to wear headphones or press buttons. Your comparison as to why doesn't the AirPods Pro or Max get the same heat that Homepod did just doesn't make sense as they have a different use case. Most people using AirPods are only going to use Siri to skip etc. If they don't own a smart speaker and want to use Siri they don't suddenly pick up their AirPods and ask Siri to turn the lights on as that's not what they're really designed for, HomePod on the other hand is sitting in your room ready and waiting for handsfree (and headphone free) commands, and as such it has the same function as it's rivals which is why it took a kicking when it's just not up to the same standard in that respect, but also has a far higher entry fee.
Apple also restricting what services can be used with it whilst allowing Apple Music on the cheaper rival speakers also didn't help, especially when said cheaper smart speakers have line out included, therefore you can happily use Apple Music with a better smart assistant having spent £30 on a cheaper smart speaker hooked up to an existing decent home system....

Indeed, I’m an Apple user but under no illusions that Siri on my iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch is completely inferior to Amazon’s voice assistant and in my mind that shouldn’t be the case. Apple are a capable enough to improve this aspect but for some reason haven’t in recent years. Hopefully they’ve realised it’s now an area that needs to be vastly improved across the range.
 
Surprised there isn’t a thread about this yet. So Apple pretty much said they’re done with this product (hardware wise but will continue to support it with software until they’re officially obsolete) to focus more on the Mini. Thought it was odd that there were no recent sales on the HomePod considering they seemingly went on sale every other month for the past two years.

I’m a fan. I have nine in total. Just picked up two more today to complete what I needed. My nearest Apple store had one Space Gray left in stock and no others within 50 miles according to the online Apple Store (NY metro and surrounding areas). Had to drive 40 miles out of state to pick up the second at a Best Buy which also only had one left in stock. Made the online purchases on both in the middle of last night.

My suggestion is, if you were looking to pick a HomePod up, do not wait for another sale. Likely not going to happen. Act fast. I did notice that the White option is a little more available than Space Gray though.

FWIW, already saw one on eBay selling for $400 BNIB.

================

Moderator Note:

Also see the discussion in the news thread:


I am so so glad that I purchased my HomePod a few months ago. I absolutely love the smart speaker. I am a huge music fan and the quality of the sound that comes out of the speaker is phenomenal. It just works so well with my Apple devices and I don’t have any problems connecting like I did when I used a third party speaker.

We also have a HomePod mini in the kitchen. I love the speaker as well and it really does fill the space even though it is a much smaller speaker.

As a family, we use the apple ecosystem more than ever before end we just love how everything works so seamlessly together.

i’m sad to see the HomePod go! I do understand given the market and the popularity of the HomePod mini.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Itinj24
But people buy smart speakers for the convenience of being able to ask for something to be done as well as listening to music without having to wear headphones or press buttons. Your comparison as to why doesn't the AirPods Pro or Max get the same heat that Homepod did just doesn't make sense as they have a different use case.

I don't know about your house, but my teen and college kids walk around all day in their AirPods barking out commands. This bias against HomePod because "it's a speaker and people expect speakers to be personal assistants" is as ludicrous as the Youtubers who started it. Tell me, if Amazon and Google made the form factor for their personal assistants a can opener, would you hold your can opener just as accountable?

Apple also restricting what services can be used with it whilst allowing Apple Music on the cheaper rival speakers also didn't help,

HomePod sold 15 million units and produced $4.5 billion dollars in revenue. HomePod as a single product outperformed the entire Sonos company with its dozens of products and a 20 year head start. "Didn't help"? HomePod is a massive success. Just has an annoying perception problem because Apple isn't a smarthome company, Apple isn't a search engine, and Apple doesn't make cheap hockey puck microphones pretending to be 'speakers'.
 
Siri has been criticized for a very long time and again, HomePod was the only device advertised as being a smart home/HomeKit speaker.

Siri will be criticized forever because people compare it to Google. Siri is a voice remote control. Google is a search engine.

Nobody was criticizing the sound of the HomePod. It was always praised by all the YouTube reviewers. Siri, price and lack of features were the issue.

Some Youtubers praised it in its second and third years. The first year was an assassination. Either way, price was the sole issue to its target audience and only for the first year. Once it was priced at $249 and $199 it was extremely competitive. It's why Apple is taking a pause, giving it technology that's 5 years newer then originally spec'd, and will re-launch it as HomePod HD or HomePod Max, perfectly parallel to the AirPods lineup.

A SiriPod at the same time as the HomePod would’ve shut the HomePod down in its tracks on the spot.

Nope. Alexa and Google aren't "speakers". They are microphones. Microphones in an enclosure that resembles a speaker. Apple should have made one of those. But they didn't. Because they aren't in the IoT and Search businesses. They are in the Music business, and HomePod is the best sounding music accessory they ever produced. I look forward to its triumphant return.
 
I don't know about your house, but my teen and college kids walk around all day in their AirPods barking out commands. This bias against HomePod because "it's a speaker and people expect speakers to be personal assistants" is as ludicrous as the Youtubers who started it. Tell me, if Amazon and Google made the form factor for their personal assistants a can opener, would you hold your can opener just as accountable?



HomePod sold 15 million units and produced $4.5 billion dollars in revenue. HomePod as a single product outperformed the entire Sonos company with its dozens of products and a 20 year head start. "Didn't help"? HomePod is a massive success. Just has an annoying perception problem because Apple isn't a smarthome company, Apple isn't a search engine, and Apple doesn't make cheap hockey puck microphones pretending to be 'speakers'.
Your credibility is shot when you keep throwing out numbers without back up. Just like when you say Apple Music is number 1 in the market. Last numbers I saw had Spotify at 36% of market, Apple at 18%. I have nothing against Apple Music, but if you are going to make an argument, please use facts.
 
Your credibility is shot when you keep throwing out numbers without back up. Just like when you say Apple Music is number 1 in the market. Last numbers I saw had Spotify at 36% of market, Apple at 18%. I have nothing against Apple Music, but if you are going to make an argument, please use facts.

I said that Apple Music is the largest streaming provider in the United States. Spotify also includes podcasts in its numbers and has a free tier that Apple lacks, making the accomplishment that much more remarkable.

No one on a message board has any credibility. This isn't a library.
 
HomePod sold 15 million units and produced $4.5 billion dollars in revenue. HomePod as a single product outperformed the entire Sonos company with its dozens of products and a 20 year head start. "Didn't help"? HomePod is a massive success. Just has an annoying perception problem because Apple isn't a smarthome company, Apple isn't a search engine, and Apple doesn't make cheap hockey puck microphones pretending to be 'speakers'.
It doesn’t matter how much revenue it made as Apple have discontinued the original HomePod in favour of a smaller cheaper model. If it was a ‘massive success’ as you claim then they wouldn’t be pulling it from the market. Apple is a ‘smart-home’ company in the same breath Amazon is. They both produce products for this market so that makes them a smart-home company.

Your wild claims here remind me of the time you claimed Apple would ‘never’ make a Max size iPhone after the iPhone X, as that was in your opinion the ultimate and only sized iPhone that caters to people who like to pretend they are multi millionaires. Remember the iPhone XS Max was never going to come out because ‘big phones are for Android users who can’t afford iPads’? Sorry but I’ll take what you say with an ocean full of salt.
 
It doesn’t matter how much revenue it made as Apple have discontinued the original HomePod in favour of a smaller cheaper model.

That's not what happened. They released the Mini to go after the under-$100 crowd and then discontinued the HomePod to replace it with one that is built to achieve typical Apple profit margins. The only thing we know for a fact is that Apple was working short on HomePod because they miscalculated what people were willing to pay for it. Now they know that a premium streaming speaker can sell in the neighborhood of 15M units at a $199 to $249 pricepoint. So they can build one. With these unprecedented times putting huge strains on supply chains worldwide, its a niche product that Apple deprioritized in the short term.

Apple is a ‘smart-home’ company in the same breath Amazon is. They both produce products for this market so that makes them a smart-home company.

Amazon is the world's largest retailer and sells every single IoT device ever made. Apple is an own-brand enterprise focusing on computing devices and streaming. You cannot compare the two. And this has very little to do with HomePod sales, just HomePod perception.

Your wild claims here remind me of the time you claimed Apple would ‘never’ make a Max size iPhone after the iPhone X, as that was in your opinion the ultimate and only sized iPhone that caters to people who like to pretend they are multi millionaires.

Those who make bold predictions sometimes make mistakes. That was one of them.
 
Let's face it. The HomePod was a "failure" because it's a unique device. Having just concluded a side-by-side comparison, my $600 pair of HomePods in stereo doesn't compete at all with other "smart" speakers. In my comparison, they are batting against a pair of floor-standing Polk Audio Monitor 70 Series II (Polk's highest-rated speakers) driven by a Monoprice hybrid tube amplifier. Total cost was $625. To my tuned ears, I can hear a difference, but it is small. The Polks have less mids, more treble, and different bass (the Polk's bass is felt in the floor, the HomePods are felt in the ear). The HomePods have a relatively flatter sound, but their bass punches hard and sub-bass growls. However, the mids are higher. Both sound outstanding on their own, and these differences are only apparent when played in comparison.

Given this, Apple and reviewers missed the mark on what the HomePods were meant to be. These were never meant to compete with Echo or Google Home, these were meant to compete with home theater systems. While I haven't tried minis yet, their design suggests competition with the likes of Sony, JBL, and Google Nest with their large pill speakers. My HomePod pair can fill a warehouse with Hi-Fi sound, which is something a Google Home or Echo can only dream of. Heck, one HomePod suffices.

And no, my sudden outpouring of support for HomePod isn't because they are no longer made. It's because like many, I was also misled by reviews on what they were supposed to be and didn't appreciate it for what it was. At the time of me owning my first one, Apple hadn't quite optimized the sound yet and it sounded to me like a speaker that was working too hard to punch above its weight. The ones I have now sound different. They sound more mature, both separately and as a pair). Even the little tab on the protective film on top of the HomePod doesn't flutter as bad as it used to (had to remove it on my original HomePod, but have been able to leave it on both of my current HomePods). Apple definitely changed their tuning somewhere along the line, because I even noticed a change in how my phone sounds in the car (after an update, it suddenly sounded more alive).

All in all, I suspect the original HomePod was more of a public test while Apple tuned its audio. I expect to see some sort of replacement within the next year, and I expect it to be a bit more substantial with a much steeper price tag. There's no way they'd leave a "mini" as the sole product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boltjames
If they do not announce a replacement end of this month, I will keep my eyes open for an additional white one to pair up with my first at a discount. I also have a stereo pair of the black version. The sound really opens up in that mode. The same is true for my white pair of minis. I do have a black singleton of that version, too.
I am in exactly the same position and of exactly the same mind.

/edit

In fact, after reading this thread, I logged on to my Perkbox account, selected their Apple EPP offer and ordered another white HomePod from Apple UK. It’ll arrive on Tuesday 👍🏻
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Itinj24
I got an used HomePod for 200 bucks. I live in a small apartment and use it mostly as background sound when I'm studying etc. I find the bass a bit too much, especially since I mostly listen on acoustic singer songwriter etc that doesn't sound well with a lot of bass.

Today I got a HomePod mini to compare with. I don't really understand the usefulness of the U1 chip, I can handoff from both HomePods just fine. However, the sound from the Mini is just so bad. It sounds like the music is coming from an iPad Pro or something. Not something I'd like to use as a speaker all day. I do however like that there isn't any bass from it, which suits my music library.

Now I don't know what to do, live with the dominant bass or live with the crappy sound. I'm normally advocating for Apple selling fewer options, but in this case I'd love to have something in between the HomePod and the HomePod Mini.
 
Now I don't know what to do, live with the dominant bass or live with the crappy sound.

Try moving the HomePod to a different location - even a few inches can make a great deal of difference, particularly if it is currently located close to a wall, or in a corner.

HomePod's ability to adjust itself to the room is pretty good in a broad sense, but it isn't all that sophisticated, so positioning does matter.
 
Try moving the HomePod to a different location - even a few inches can make a great deal of difference, particularly if it is currently located close to a wall, or in a corner.

HomePod's ability to adjust itself to the room is pretty good in a broad sense, but it isn't all that sophisticated, so positioning does matter.
Thanks for the advice.
But how many of us can place a HomePod in the middle of our room? I for sure don't have any furniture in the middle of the room.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.