i would hazard producing a device with a removable cable would be worse for the environment than without.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
HomePod Mini Teardown Confirms Power Cord Can't Be Removed
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
i would hazard producing a device with a removable cable would be worse for the environment than without.
Don't be sarcastic. Toaster at least have a robust power cables. Apple is known for producing throwaway cables (wait I though they were environment-friendly)
You should check out the cable attached to the HomePod Mini before commenting. Also... you may want to contemplate how HomePod cord handling/usage will be far different from that of a phone/laptop or other mobile device cable which will undergo attachment/detachment every day.
As an aside, I've have yet to have an Apple Lightning or USB-C cable fail - over many devices and years. They're very robust.
Last edited:
It's obviously by design (to sell more when the wire breaks) like the new MagSafe charger.
Seriously? Have you thought this through?
The reason they are powered 24 hours a day is so I can ask any one of my stationary five HomePods and now two HomePod Minis to play music whenever I want.
Last thing I want to do is worry about making sure all my devices are charged up.
My TVs are also connected 24hrs to power for the same reason.
How will the wire break? I have yet to have a power cable for any device "break," in many years. Ever.
What logical reason? Its a HOMEpod not a portable bluetooth speaker.
It's also a HomeKit Hub. If you want to control your home devices while you're away (or just check up on your home from afar) then it has to be connected to power 24x7.
That's also why an internal rechargeable battery makes no sense.
Why on earth didn’t they do just USB-C both ends? Annoyingly long cable.
I mean I get why they didn’t.... but still why.... I‘d have a 20 cm one.
I mean I get why they didn’t.... but still why.... I‘d have a 20 cm one.
So because it has a bettery it can't be connected 24/7? Guess what all bluetooth speakers have a battery AND can be connected 24/7. The option is yours, but now you have no option with homepod speaker. Direct electricity input or it will not work.
Why do you care about size and weight of a device meant to be placed and not carried, this is not a phone or laptop.
Since you're bringing up Bluetooth, it seems you're not aware HomePod is not a speaker that you can use via Bluetooth.
You should find and purchase a battery powered Bluetooth speaker and find some joy and happiness. There are no doubt at least a hundred of them put there. HomePod Mini is definitely not what you're looking for. Apple will never accede to your wishes, as frustrating as that may be, so it's probably best to move on.
It’s not a Bluetooth speaker either but you seem hell bent on being outraged it isn’t.
Respectfully, you may have misunderstood.
As a HomeKit Hub, the HomePod must stay connected 24x7x365. When used as a HomeKit hub, it acts as part of a smart home's essential network infrastructure.
Making it portable, by giving it a rechargeable battery, would encourage undesirable use cases. For example, a user might be tempted go mobile and take take it poolside on a nice day, but then forget to bring it back indoors.
They wouldn't notice any issue at all until they were on a flight the next day and tried to connect to their smart home to turn the heating/AC to away mode. At that point the poolside HomePod battery would be flat and the user would be unceremoniously cut off from their smart home. Not good.
In the same vein, I think Apple made a big mistake in using a USB-C power brick to power the HomePod Mini. On paper it makes sense (common hardware components, shared cost, etc.) but having an separate power brick encourages not only homeowners, but their families and guest to disconnect the HomePod temporarily so they can charge their iPhone, MacBook, iPad, etc. - not realizing that in doing so they've disabled the smart home's essential infrastructure.
Some people may care about size and weight. The smaller it is the easier to place in an inconspicuous space.
Unless your whole home will shutdown if the "homekit" device(homepod) loses electricity, I think you will be ok. It just means you won't be able to control your home via voice commands, which is how 99.9% of people still do.
Yes, and if you really want to use a HomeKit mini on battery, I'm sure you'll find a way. Heck, plug it into a diesel generator if you have to. You can also take a slot toaster with you to work every day, but most people don't do that.
It doesn't change that that's not its intended purpose. Comparing it to portable Bluetooth speakers is silly because it's neither portable nor a Bluetooth speaker.
My idea is that if you have this in your bedroom, then maybe you can pick it to the pool side or the garage and get the functionality with you. Now you have to:
1-Buy one for the pool, one for the garage, one for the bedroom.
2-Pull the plug out and try to find an electric outlet in the garage and the pool
see its much easier if it had a battery, it does not hurt. People here make it sound like its a bad thing if it could run on batteries.
it is a bad thing because then I would have to pay for batteries for a device that doesn’t need them.