While many of us would love updated HomePod, I doubt it's coming anytime soon. Apple would've kept it in their line up if that was the plan.
Well, there's a more cynical take that Apple wanted to sell out the old stock before cannibalizing it with a new model. If true, it definitely seems to be working, as the new Apple TV 4K features have put the HomePod more in demand than ever — especially with fears that it may not be possible to get a replacement anytime soon. I've personally picked up three more since they've been discontinued.
Not that I buy into that theory, but I can't entirely rule it out either. Apple did say it's putting all of its efforts into the HomePod mini for now, however, and I suspect the next-gen HomePod-related product is still quite a ways off. After all, consider how long we waited for a new Apple TV 4K (and what we got when one finally did show up).
With Apple TV 4K (2nd generation) unlocking eARC on the original HomePods, I am betting on a HomePod soundbar.
I'm thinking something along those lines, or more likely this hybrid Apple TV+HomePod thing that Apple is rumoured to be working on. Again, though, I suspect that's still a long way off... I'd be surprised if we even see it next year, considering how slow Apple moves in the home space. It's definitely a second or even third-tier business for them.
Meanwhile, they really are putting all of their eggs into the HomePod mini basket. Look at yesterday's announcement that the HomePod mini will now work as default speakers for the Apple TV. Of course, Apple coyly avoided mentioning that you're not going to get Dolby Atmos audio with a pair of those, but it seems clear the HomePod mini is the only thing in their short to medium term strategy.
The original HomePod is a great device that was mis-marketed. Too many people thought it was Apple's answer to the Echo Dot. I've got three (and a mini) and they're great.
I think the problem is that most folks don't take Apple seriously as a
speaker company. The iPod Hi-Fi suffered from a similar perception problem... Even though Apple hired at least one senior engineer from Klipsch to design the original iPod Hi-Fi, the Apple brand isn't something most people associate with great audio fidelity. If it doesn't have a name like Bose or JBL (or Harman Kardon) or Sony, then it can't possibly be a good speaker. Apple is instead lumped in with companies like Logitech and Creative Labs who make computer speakers, but not "real" speakers for home entertainment systems.
The same applies to Google and Amazon, so naturally, most folks assumed the HomePod just had to be some cheap speaker by a tech company.
The price in Canada for it was ridiculous - I'm surprised they sold out.
Actually, the price in Canada was comparable to what the market will bear. Things in the U.S. seem cheap because we don't live in the U.S. economy. I've heard these same complaints since the original iPod came out 20 years ago, but when you look at things like average daily wage and cost of living, the prices of Apple products in every country are roughly equivalent, give or take a few bucks. In other words, at $299 USD, the HomePod "feels" just as expensive to people living in the U.S. as the $399 CAD HomePod does to us up here in Canada.
It's also priced roughly for what the average exchange rate was at the time. It hasn't been adjusted for this year's plummeting currency rates, but Apple always understandably lags on that — in both directions. When the rates skyrocketed a few years ago, it took about 6-12 months before the Canadian prices went up to match.
The elephant in the room is Siri, which needs to be much more responsive (faster processor would help but it needs more local processing) and smarter.
I hope that yesterday's announcement of local Siri processing in iOS 15 will also apply to the HomePod, as you're absolutely right that this is probably the biggest limitation of Siri, especially in a HomeKit context. Every so often it's almost instantaneous, which makes it all the more disappointing for all of those other times when it takes just long enough that you wonder if it's actually going to work or not...
That's the point I've been making -- people were judging it in the wrong category, because Apple marketing didn't get the word out about what the HomePod really was. It wasn't meant to be an Echo Dot. Apple let the message get away from them.
As I mentioned above, I don't think Apple deserves all of the blame for this. They had a lot of market inertia to overcome from folks who automatically dismissed the HomePod as a "computer speaker." The iPod Hi-Fi suffered pretty much the exact same fate — nobody took Apple seriously.
The Apple Watch had a similar mindset to overcome when it was first released, and I've always been convinced that the only reason Apple ever produced the Gold Edition version was to get the fashion industry to take Apple seriously as a brand, rather than just dismissing the wearable as a techie toy. I'm really not sure how Apple could have done something similar in the audio industry, however... Perhaps finding a way to partner with the higher-end boutique home audio shops to position the HomePod as a more serious device?
Ultimately, though, I think Apple was living in a bubble when it created the HomePod. It clearly thought the market for the device was much bigger than it actually was. It wasn't just a marketing issue.... The HomePod appealed only to a very specific type of user — the person who was very firmly entrenched in the Apple ecosystem, from Siri to HomeKit to Apple Music. I'm that guy, which is why I have a dozen HomePods and HomePod minis around the house, but I also recognize that I'm in the minority.