No Bluetooth is the biggest flaw and a totally unnecessary restriction.Because:
1. Siri is limited
2. Pricy compared to other smart speakers (not necessarily to other high end dump speaker tho).
(Why Airpods support Bluetooth but HomePod doesn’t??)
No Bluetooth is the biggest flaw and a totally unnecessary restriction.Because:
1. Siri is limited
2. Pricy compared to other smart speakers (not necessarily to other high end dump speaker tho).
Amazing that Apple can give the time and money to this thing but not to a new Mac mini or computer display or router or........
HomePod shipments totaled an estimated 700,000 units in the second quarter of 2018, giving Apple a roughly six percent share of the worldwide smart speaker market, according to research firm Strategy Analytics.
![]()
Strategy Analytics previously estimated HomePod shipments totaled 600,000 units in the first quarter of 2018, suggesting that worldwide shipments have reached 1.3 million units since the speaker became available to order in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom in late January.
That figure is much lower than one shared by research firm Consumer Intelligence Research Partners, which recently estimated Apple has sold three million HomePods in the United States alone since the speaker launched.
The significant variance in the datasets stems from the fact that Apple doesn't disclose HomePod sales, instead grouping the speaker under its "Other Products" category in its earnings reports, alongside the Apple Watch, Apple TV, AirPods, Beats, iPod touch, and other Apple and third-party accessories.
Apple reported revenue of $3.74 billion from its "Other Products" category last quarter, up 37 percent from $2.73 billion in the year-ago quarter.
Shipments aren't sales, either, so it's impossible to know exactly how many HomePods ended up in the hands of customers.
If we had to guess, we'd say the Strategy Analytics numbers are probably more within the ballpark, as the HomePod is a niche product. The speaker is also available in just six countries, after launching in Canada, France, and Germany in June, with no indication when availability may expand to other regions.
Versus the Competition
HomePod was the world's fourth most popular smart speaker in the second quarter, behind the Amazon Echo, Google Home, and Chinese company Alibaba's Tmall Genie, according to Strategy Analytics.
Amazon remained the leader in the category last quarter, with the Echo commanding an estimated 41 percent market share, while the Google Home finished runner-up with an estimated 27 percent market share, according to Strategy Analytics. Alibaba took third place with an estimated seven percent market share.
![]()
While the HomePod has made somewhat of a dent, Apple still has significant ground to make up, which is to be expected given its smart speaker launched around two to three years after its biggest competitors.
It may be tough for Apple to gain further market share unless it releases a more competitively priced model, as the HomePod at $349 is considerably more expensive than the Amazon Echo, priced from $50, and the Google Home, $129.
To that end, rumors suggest Apple may have a lower-priced HomePod or a Siri-enabled Beats speaker in its pipeline.
Article Link: HomePod Sales May Be Closer to 1-1.5 Million Than 3 Million Since the Speaker Launched
Got two paired up in the reading room. Considering a third one to put in the bedroom.
Mostly for music. A little bit of "Hey Siri, weather?" or "Hey siri, lights off" thrown in.
Entirely happy with 'em.
It's fair in the same way you would compare an all-in-one form-factor desktop computer (iMac or Surface Studio) vs the flexibility and customization you have with a tower PC.Why are we still comparing the HomePod to a 50$ Echo? It’s a voice assistant “speaker” versus a real music speaker that also has Siri.
A lot of people don't care about music quality enough to spend $350 on a speaker. I think if they managed to come up with a good $150 speaker they would sell like hotcakes.
With how many AirPods I'm seeing now days, I think that is where most the growth came from. Seeing more Apple Watches, too.Remember, nothing is confirmed. We do know Apple's “other products” category grew 37% y/y with no new hardware besides HomePod.
I’m betting it’s selling well.
AirPod hardware is 2 years old and Watch is a year old. Sure, there was growth there, but 37% is notable.With how many AirPods I'm seeing now days, I think that is where most the growth came from. Seeing more Apple Watches, too.
If it was dong well, Apple would release the numbers.AirPod hardware is 2 years old and Watch is a year old. Sure, there was growth there, but 37% is notable.
My sense is HomePod is doing quite well. This is not an Echo competitor...totally different product.
Well, it’s going to be tiny...it just came out and it’s priced at the high end of the market because it targets different users. Apple actually makes good margins, which isn’t the case for the AMZN product.If it was dong well, Apple would release the numbers.
Every third party analysis is showing homepod with a tiny market share, distant third or fourth
We have to accept that not everything Apple touches becomes gold. They have hits and misses
not really as the apple watch is doing very well but apple don't release exact numbers. Only iphones and ipads they seem to do.If it was dong well, Apple would release the numbers.
Every third party analysis is showing homepod with a tiny market share, distant third or fourth
We have to accept that not everything Apple touches becomes gold. They have hits and misses
The Apple watch is doing well yet Apple will never release the numbers for that.If it was dong well, Apple would release the numbers.
Every third party analysis is showing homepod with a tiny market share, distant third or fourth
We have to accept that not everything Apple touches becomes gold. They have hits and misses
Perhaps the HomePod exists to encourage Apple Music subs rather than the other way around. Think about it.I honestly don't think price is the largest factor holding back the HomePod (though it may be for some)... It's a high quality Apple product with a high Apple price and I'm sure it sounds lovely.
Lack of capability is what's holding back the HomePod. It's a one trick pony for AM subscribers, so right out of the gate they've severely limited their target market. AM subscribers who don't already have a decent way the play music in their home and don't want a product that's compatible with other services (not even your Home Shared iTunes library!) or use cases, like BT or line in... so, like four people. I can't believe they sold a million of these things.
If it was dong well, Apple would release the numbers.
Every third party analysis is showing homepod with a tiny market share, distant third or fourth
We have to accept that not everything Apple touches becomes gold. They have hits and misses