Not to be mean but the touch bar on the MacBook Pro is pretty useless. Seems more of a hassle since you can easily get to the same function with a simple click.
One of the main reasons I moved away from Android to iPhone many years ago was that I was fed up with always accidentally hitting the soft buttons on the bezel, and always having to look down at the bezel to press home. Jumping onto the iPhone with its one physical home button was like... coming home. Simple design at its absolute best. Apple, please don't sacrifice something classic and great for something new and kinda cool.
If it makes the usable screen less than 5.5" I will opt for the Plus model with my upgrade this year. I would go larger but 5.5" is my minimum "usable" screen size.
Yes. Or offer an even larger model. I'll take a 6/7" screen if the phone is the same size as my 7 Plus.I completely agree. I am not happy about this rumor at all. 0.65 inches of I personally believe, wasted space. I really hope this is just early testing that is being rumored. They must surely be able to make the bottom 0.65 inches of the screen be used normally like everyone is used to. I want a minimum of 5.5 inches screen size, anything smaller will feel like a huge downgrade. If it isn't broken, don't fix it.
Not to be mean but the touch bar on the MacBook Pro is pretty useless. Seems more of a hassle since you can easily get to the same function with a simple click.
If it makes the usable screen less than 5.5" I will opt for the Plus model with my upgrade this year. I would go larger but 5.5" is my minimum "usable" screen size.
As long as there is one physical button or separate chip based virtual button it will be okay.
But if there is only a software virtual button there's going to be trouble rebooting the device.
I don't know if you have an iPhone 6s or 7 but 3D Touch enliminates this problem completely.One of the main reasons I moved away from Android to iPhone many years ago was that I was fed up with always accidentally hitting the soft buttons on the bezel, and always having to look down at the bezel to press home. Jumping onto the iPhone with its one physical home button was like... coming home. Simple design at its absolute best. Apple, please don't sacrifice something classic and great for something new and kinda cool.
True, I'm saying that if all buttons are replaced with virtual buttons when Apple completely encloses the iPhone in glass with no buttons or ports.Why? You don't need the home button to do a force restart on the 7. You use the volume down button instead.
there is zero chance that the area will be dedicated. It will be just like the keyboard, when you need it there it is, when you don't its gone and the screen fills the space. Likely the swipe up gesture will bring up the function area and then if you swipe up from there control centre comes up
Don't you see? They're innovating with words.The iPhone already has a function bar. Its called the display.
The home button where it is in the first example is just wasting so much space and look so odd. There is no way Apple would do it like that. It's at least 20% too high thus wasting a ton more screen space then is necessary. A current iPhone 7 has the home button place much closer to the bottom of the phone.
One of the main reasons I moved away from Android to iPhone many years ago was that I was fed up with always accidentally hitting the soft buttons on the bezel, and always having to look down at the bezel to press home. Jumping onto the iPhone with its one physical home button was like... coming home. Simple design at its absolute best. Apple, please don't sacrifice something classic and great for something new and kinda cool.
The home button has to be always on otherwise how could get out of an app if the app is taking the whole screen. Home button is like an emergency exit button it has to be always on display.I could see how this might work. Turn the phone landscape and you still get edit tools in fullscreen mode.
View attachment 691071