Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

carebearsx3

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 2, 2010
122
0
When Steve Jobs announced that the steel band going around the phone would double as an antenna, everyone was surprised. This begs the question, in the tear-downs by Gizmodo and Vietnam, how did no one notice that the antennas were missing from the device?
 
Which makes me ask the question... if there were no antenna's... How was this "lost phone" being used by the "loser"... Can we say controlled leak?? :D I think they wanted everyone to get used to the new look before launch... I mean, we were all still surprised at the keynote right? Apple knew EXACTLY what they were doing... leaking the final version didn't leak too much at all...
 
I'm not sure how they work. But my guess is the the other iPhones have an antenna integrated onto the main logic board and along with the other traces they look like nothing special.
 
Gizmodo isn't a bunch of engineers. They're gadget bloggers. Somebody like iSupply would have to have done the teardown to know about the antennas.
 
Can we say controlled leak?? :D

I thought it was a plant to distract us and thought the outward appearance would be drastically different (being the same as the current iPhones). But I was wrong! Still seems sweet though :D
 
Gizmodo isn't a bunch of engineers. They're gadget bloggers. Somebody like iSupply would have to have done the teardown to know about the antennas.

But even they might have seen it, I mean it was the freaking news! But no one said anything. Weird, huh?
 
I'm not sure how they work. But my guess is the the other iPhones have an antenna integrated onto the main logic board and along with the other traces they look like nothing special.

The two black bands along the edge isolate the two antennas from eachother.
 
When Steve Jobs announced that the steel band going around the phone would double as an antenna, everyone was surprised. This begs the question, in the tear-downs by Gizmodo and Vietnam, how did no one notice that the antennas were missing from the device?

Because if you recall the Gizmodo article and images of the breakdown, 90% of the inside was covered by metal housing. They dared not remove in fear of damaging the phone.

Can't see past a metal plate.
 
According to Steve, iPhone 4 has two metal bands that serve as antennas: (1) Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS and (2) UMTS, GSM.

My question is: why three seams then? Three seams would divide the band into three parts. Why the extra seam? Please, someone, clarify this for me. Ta.
 
According to Steve, iPhone 4 has two metal bands that serve as antennas: (1) Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS and (2) UMTS, GSM.

My question is: why three seams then? Three seams would divide the band into three parts. Why the extra seam? Please, someone, clarify this for me. Ta.

Symmetry. It's actually only two parts. One seam is false.
 
I almost failed my antenna design class, but they could be elements that aren't actually attached to the phone electrically like in a Yagi antenna.
 
When Steve Jobs announced that the steel band going around the phone would double as an antenna, everyone was surprised. This begs the question, in the tear-downs by Gizmodo and Vietnam, how did no one notice that the antennas were missing from the device?

I'd side with those that have said Gizmodo didn't know what they were looking for during their teardown. Antennas in mobile phones look pretty similar to the flat cables common in mobile electronics.

Unless you were an engineer, you wouldn't know what you were looking for. And the shots from Gizmodo don't give you enough of an idea that anything is really all that different. They totally ignore any connections to the casing itself. Looks like the connections to the antennas aren't even soldered, perhaps.
 
Only for the sake of symmetry??? Really???


Apple has an eye for design up to the smallest detail. For example, on the Macbook models that were plastic before the unibody metal or plastic ones (2006-early 2008 models), they had screws that have no function on the side just for cosmetic purposes to match the other side...
 
Only for the sake of symmetry??? Really???

Look at how many people bitched about the seams to begin with. Can you imagine the bitch mongering that would have taken place with only 2 seams?

It's for the better.

I had no issues with the seams. I like the look and still do. Can't wait to have it in my hot little hands! :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.