Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Online I hit nbcnews/fox news
Tv: Local broadcast station
Paper: local news print that contains town info
Sports (that's news right), profootball talk, espn, cbssports.
Tech news: MacRumors, Engadget, Ars Technica
 
My news consumption plummeted significantly right before 2016. I grew up reading newspapers and magazines that neighbors would give me. Out of high school I paid for WSJ, Economist, Times, Newsweek, and local LA Times. As prices went up and ads became more and more intrusive, I stopped paying for things and moved to online with an adblocker.

Now, mostly just WSJ, Economist, Ars Technica, Macrumors for Apple, and a 15 min scroll through Apple News and a little bit of Redditing. I used to consume everything on my iPad Pro 11 but now my 16' MBP is where I do most of my reading. I've found magazines to be particularly enjoyable again - starting to read those a bit more on Apple News+ - I just can't stand the ads.

While Economist's reporting on Ukraine is great, the advertisements (even with an adblocker) are insane. I don't pay these companies to force feed me distractions while I'm trying to read. The more they try to force ads the more I'll be looking elsewhere to spend my time and money (but will gladly pay not to see ads).
 
. . . and ads became more and more intrusive . . .

. . . I just can't stand the ads. . .

. . . the advertisements (even with an adblocker) are insane . . .
Agree completely. One thing about using the iPhone or iPad, 'Reader View' (when available) is terrific at cleaning up the display and eliminating everything except for the text and photos. I also find that the Apple News and News+ articles are very clean and without ads, only showing links to related stories at the end of any particular article. In fact, I don't recall noticing any ads whatsoever in Apple News (whether +, or not)?? But Apple News doesn't provide access to everything, of course.
 
Agree completely. One thing about using the iPhone or iPad, 'Reader View' (when available) is terrific at cleaning up the display and eliminating everything except for the text and photos. I also find that the Apple News and News+ articles are very clean and without ads, only showing links to related stories at the end of any particular article. In fact, I don't recall noticing any ads whatsoever in Apple News (whether +, or not)?? But Apple News doesn't provide access to everything, of course.
I need to look into that again. Last time I tried using it, it would often miss article photos (but was excellent at getting the text). This was years ago. Looks like it's really improved. Thanks for the reminder :D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil77354
My news consumption plummeted significantly right before 2016. I grew up reading newspapers and magazines that neighbors would give me. Out of high school I paid for WSJ, Economist, Times, Newsweek, and local LA Times. As prices went up and ads became more and more intrusive, I stopped paying for things and moved to online with an adblocker.

Now, mostly just WSJ, Economist, Ars Technica, Macrumors for Apple, and a 15 min scroll through Apple News and a little bit of Redditing. I used to consume everything on my iPad Pro 11 but now my 16' MBP is where I do most of my reading. I've found magazines to be particularly enjoyable again - starting to read those a bit more on Apple News+ - I just can't stand the ads.

While Economist's reporting on Ukraine is great, the advertisements (even with an adblocker) are insane. I don't pay these companies to force feed me distractions while I'm trying to read. The more they try to force ads the more I'll be looking elsewhere to spend my time and money (but will gladly pay not to see ads).
Is it the case that when you have a paid subscription to the digital Economist, which is not inexpensive, you still get ads?
 
Is it the case that when you have a paid subscription to the digital Economist, which is not inexpensive, you still get ads?
Yep. Same for WSJ. Despite paying there's ads galore. So I use an adblocker. Economist has been recently adding code to their ads to make it difficult for the adblockers to block them (randomizing the location/labels so AdGuard Pro couldn't block them as easily - AdGuard Pro eventually put out an update to block them).

I can't stand using my subscription of WSJ or Economist on Apple News because of the ads. If there wasn't an adblocker in Safari I'd have left news a long time ago.
 
Yes, it was an attempt at humor, always risky in an internet discussion of course . . .
You got me. I thought you were serious so I didn't want to be mean and laugh. - Heh - Very well done - thanks for the good laugh. :)
 
Yep. Same for WSJ. Despite paying there's ads galore. So I use an adblocker. Economist has been recently adding code to their ads to make it difficult for the adblockers to block them (randomizing the location/labels so AdGuard Pro couldn't block them as easily - AdGuard Pro eventually put out an update to block them).

I can't stand using my subscription of WSJ or Economist on Apple News because of the ads. If there wasn't an adblocker in Safari I'd have left news a long time ago.
Apple News is not available where I am so I have no experience with that service. I just had a quick look at my hard copy of the Economist Christmas Double Issue (purchased at my local bookshop, not subscription) and there are a few ads but it is easy to ignore them. Much more irritating if you are being bombarded as you scroll through in the digital magazine. I would certainly cancel my subscription under their current way of operating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Apple News is not available where I am so I have no experience with that service. I just had a quick look at my hard copy of the Economist Christmas Double Issue (purchased at my local bookshop, not subscription) and there are a few ads but it is easy to ignore them. Much more irritating if you are being bombarded as you scroll through in the digital magazine. I would certainly cancel my subscription under their current way of operating.
Yeah the Economist - World in 2022 magazine that they mail out to us subscribers at the start of the year is perfect - hardly any ads (I don't mind the full pages ones now and then). Their paper editions have always been really conservative on the ads too - I usually pick one of those up for a long flight if I feel like it. WSJ and Economist are definitely in my top 'must haves' because of their reporting. If I had more $ and time I'd do more but I've been reading more books lately.
 
Yeah the World in 2022 magazine that they mail out to us subscribers is perfect - hardly any ads (I don't mind the full pages ones now and then all that bad). Their paper editions have always been really conservative on the ads too - I usually pick one of those up for a long flight if I feel like it. WSJ and Economist are definitely in my top 'must haves' because of their reporting. If I had more $ and time I'd do more but I've been reading more books lately.
I subscribed briefly to the New York Times from abroad a couple of years ago. Never again. To cancel you must inform them by a telephone call. What a sleazy 1950's way of operating. They obviously want to have the chance to sweet talk you into not cancelling. Most or all 1-800 numbers companies give you to use are invalid from outside North America so screw them.
 
I subscribed briefly to the New York Times from abroad a couple of years ago. Never again. To cancel you must inform them by a telephone call. What a sleazy 1950's way of operating. They obviously want to have the chance to sweet talk you into not cancelling. Most or all 1-800 numbers companies give you to use are invalid from outside North America so screw them.
Yep, that type of stuff gets me *really* mad. Do that and I'll never spend a $ there again. Now I look for "Online Cancel" option before starting a new subscription.
 
I read a few news publications using apps (e.g. The Economist, FT, WSJ); many using mailing lists (e.g. Espresso/The World in Brief by The Economist, EIU newsletters, TidBITS, Nature, specific columns from other publications etc.); some via RSS feeds on Reeder. I still mainly rely on print copies of FT and The Economist for longer articles e.g. The Big Read and leaders/briefing. Increasingly there are streaming subscriber-only events which I find timely and interesting. Also playing with some of the codes generating charts and models, e.g. the COVID-19 excess death model released by The Economist on GitHub (if those were considered news).
 
consume the news???

so when is it it actually digestible?

But usually I consume the news when I have a strong cup of coffee
 
I subscribed briefly to the New York Times from abroad a couple of years ago. Never again. To cancel you must inform them by a telephone call. What a sleazy 1950's way of operating. They obviously want to have the chance to sweet talk you into not cancelling.
I'm fighting Sirius XM on that right now. I sent them a letter saying I'd keep their service if they'd keep the price at $99/year, they called me at home and I said, that's my final offer, and hung up. They sent me an email to call them and they'd discuss it. I replied, "Just Cancel!"
They charged my CC $26 this month, and I've denied the charge, we'll see what happens next; I may have to change my CC number again. :mad:
 
  • Sad
Reactions: chengengaun
I'm fighting Sirius XM on that right now. I sent them a letter saying I'd keep their service if they'd keep the price at $99/year, they called me at home and I said, that's my final offer, and hung up. They sent me an email to call them and they'd discuss it. I replied, "Just Cancel!"
They charged my CC $26 this month, and I've denied the charge, we'll see what happens next; I may have to change my CC number again. :mad:
Yep, I’m not paying $237 a year for SiriusXM. I auto renew in mid June. I’ll call them up before then and tell them $10 a month or less is the price if they want me to renew and they have been doing that for the last 10 years.
 
You can always negotiate better renewal with XM, just set a reminder to call them within a couple weeks of your renewal date, and ask for the ‘Listener Care’, or ‘Customer Retention’ department. They will always agree to renew for the lower price (roughly $10/month) if you are clear that you will cancel unless they do that.
 
Reluctantly......
I try to live under a rock as much as possible (seriously)....;)

Ignorance is bliss.
I live similarly to this. Not sure what good it does having all the Worlds news at your finger tips. Also with the way the internet is these days your news is curated for you to match your political leanings. I know of the big things, elections, war, etc. Hard to miss them, but I stick completely clear of celebrity gossip and just about anything else. Does nothing to my life to improve it so I avoid it. I believe Paul Simon wrote "I get all the news I need from the weather report".
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkC426
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.