Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've seen a few posts on here where people have had bad blocks containing data tagged by Scannerz (http://scsc-online.com/Scannerz.html).

What do I mean by this? Theoretically a bad block on an SSD is supposed to be caught before it writes data to it and then the bad block get re-mapped. What I'm reading is that a block that's already been written to just decides to go bad even though its holding data, which I thought wasn't supposed to happen.

Are there any real statistics on SSD reliability and testing anywhere that are current?

That can happen in iPhones too. Anything with Flash memory, actually. I had a song in my iTunes library on my iPhone and every time it would get to the exact same spot in the song it would lock up for a few seconds then iTunes would just die, like I had quit it. Only that one song too. To correct the problem I had to wipe the iPhone and do a complete restore. Now everything works again.
 
SSD hard drives are as good as a kit kat bar in a fridge. But sometimes a fridge dies and so does your kit kat. Sorry it is really late, but I'm trying to say SSD are the best, but they do fail even though its rare
 
Is it my imagination or there some type of SSD paranoia floating about?
Yes I agree with you.

Personally I embrace change, been using SSD's since Apple began shipping them in new 15" MBP Retina models I use for work.

Now years and lots of heavy use later my experience has been stellar. Fast and reliable I only think of them when I see a thread appear in this forum... :)
 
Is it my imagination or there some type of SSD paranoia floating about?

I agree,

I have been using ssds since 2009, i have experienced over 16 different ssds, from 64gb-500gb
including:
ocz vertex 2/3/max iops
owc mercury extreme
crucials m3/m4
corsair f40
samsung 840s
intel

to name a few

only issues i ever experienced were with the older sandforce gen 2s
 
As an FYI, TRIM doesn't seem to be supported on third party SSDs on Yosemite.

There's a shocker!!!
 
Third party TRIM from sources like Cindori (TRIM enabler) won't work because the kernel won't allow it to load. It will, however, work on Mavericks and earlier OS releases.
 
Third party TRIM from sources like Cindori (TRIM enabler) won't work because the kernel won't allow it to load. It will, however, work on Mavericks and earlier OS releases.

- What utter rubbish.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-05-17 at 21.34.21.png
    Screen Shot 2015-05-17 at 21.34.21.png
    131.3 KB · Views: 76
I disagree with you....

Well, all righty then:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tJGk4ofc18

I don't use Yosemite because I think it sucks. Bugs galore, it looks like it was designed by a five year old, and it's resource intensive for no apparent reason. Also, NVRAM contents are known to become corrupt.

Be sure to put me in my place.

but I can't put you in your place for personal preference. I love Yosemite, cleaner looking UI that looks great on the retina screens; with a load of extra little bits that make interconnection with my other devices easy whats not to like??
 
but I can't put you in your place for personal preference. I love Yosemite, cleaner looking UI that looks great on the retina screens; with a load of extra little bits that make interconnection with my other devices easy whats not to like??

My comment wasn't directed at you, it was directed at JTToft.

Everyone has different opinions. If you like Yosemite, go with it.
 
Having to disable a security feature to use a common device driver is a bad idea. It strikes me as a shot by Apple on do-it-yourselfers. I really don't think it would be rocket science for Apple themselves to make TRIM support of their own available to third party products.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.