I can’t fathom paying that much for a phone with only 64gb. 256gb would be ideal for a happy/medium. Apple should offer 128gb standard instead of that measly 64gb. But, they won’t since the 64gb seems to sell well for them regardless of price.
10 x one hundred million iPhones is a lot of profit for Applethe biggest criticism i have for apple is they are the only one charging 1k for a phone and it comes with 64gb, based on industry average them adding another 64gb wouldn't cost more than 10 bucks.
lol true dat. they know folks gonna put out the extra $$$ for the memory.10 x one hundred million iPhones is a lot of profit for Apple
the biggest criticism i have for apple is they are the only one charging 1k for a phone and it comes with 64gb, based on industry average them adding another 64gb wouldn't cost more than 10 bucks.
s10 base storage is 128gb.Both Google and Samsung flagship devices are in the same price range. The galaxy fold is at 2k price point by the way.
s10 base storage is 128gb.
I have 14.7Gb used out of 64 so far on my 11 Pro, I always go for the base model as I never fill it up, my photos/videos get transferred to my NAS as soon as possible so no need for huge storage, though I do think the base model should have more than 64Gb.
Adam.
Never said that, your the one who mentioned Samsung, so I’m just going by what you want to compare toPrice of a device is not really just based on storage, is it?!
Never said that, your the one who mentioned Samsung, so I’m just going by what you want to compare to
U need To go back and re-readBecause you originally said Apple is the only company to charge 1K for a flagship.
the biggest criticism i have for apple is they are the only one charging 1k for a phone and it comes with 64gb, based on industry average them adding another 64gb wouldn't cost more than 10 bucks.
Both Google and Samsung flagship devices are in the same price range. The galaxy fold is at 2k price point by the way.
I would say that the Galaxy Fold is in its own market since Apple has nothing like it. Samsung could charge whatever they want and people will still buy it for the early adoption experience.
you are not very good on staying on topic are you, we are talking about storage and yet you bringing in everything else, everyone gets flaks, you go on android authority plenty of samsung complaints, no one gets special treatments.Isn’t that the same for Apple when it comes to the Face ID technology they incorporated with the iPhone X or Touch ID with the iPhone 5S? That level of security and seamless integration with payment system didn’t exist before that in consumer smartphones. All previous implementations by other companies were flawed. So when it comes to pricing I suppose apple was fine to charge whatever they wanted. Why’s it when Apple does something there’s always criticism and when others do it, it’s fine?!
you are not very good on staying on topic are you, we are talking about storage and yet you bringing in everything else, everyone gets flaks, you go on android authority plenty of samsung complaints, no one gets special treatments.