Those are nice boot times and shutdown times indeed but it's not what I meant with that. I've seen quite a number of computers with Windows, Linux and OS X that have a boot up time that requires grabbing coffee. In most cases booting up takes longer than shutting down and it's just odd to see people not compain about something that takes longer than the one they are complaining about. That's intriguing. What makes shutdown so important and boot up so unimportant?Dyn, With a 2012 SSD MBP, bootup times are about 8 seconds with any OS X version. I have never seen a spinning-HD OS-X system boot up nearly this fast - more like 30 sec. - 1 min. Mine takes 5-8 seconds up, and 3-5 seconds down. It will restart from running back to useable config in less than 15 seconds.
That's what I thought but from an experience I can tell you that doesn't really happen in the real world. Most seem to be complaining when it takes more than getting some coffee or going to the loo (thus more than 5 minutes) for both boot up and shutdown. I would complain too if it would take more than 30 seconds (if there are no updates to be installed). I've even come across quite a few users who were perfectly fine with very slow machines (it takes them 15 to 30 minutes to go from on to being logged in...yes, I pondered sending them to a psych..).You raise a good point; if an SSD OS X machine started taking 30+ seconds to boot, I believe people would definitely raise hell about it. I certainly would.
From a user point of view I can understand it a little bit. How long should a computer boot up/shutdown? Is it 10 seconds, 30, 90? They have no clue since they have no clue about IT. That might explain why they are not complaining. They just don't know it should/can be faster.
I wonder how much 3rd party apps also cause this issue. Not every app supports something like sudden termination which Apple has implemented since 10.7 and uses more strictly in 10.8. Could be that this might lead to problems as well. Since 10.9 again changes a lot on how to handle apps running in the background and such it could be that Apple tweaked and we get better shutdown times because of that.I agree with KB - Shutdown monitor repeatedly tries to kill the launchd and launchagents processes that are notorious for hanging on shutdown. Some of these processes previously claimed not to support "dirty/idle" exits. One of these was launchd.peruser.501 that also did not respond to a 1 sec. terminal hack timeout with ML 10.8.4-5 and Mav. DP4, when every other problematic process was successfully remedied by 1 sec. terminal timeout hacks. Therefore, it is highly noteworthy that Apple has remedied these processes to have a successful default 1 second kill with 10.9 DP5.