When will we be able to plug an iPhone into a USB-C monitor, connect to a mouse and keyboard via bluetooth, and run MacOS on the monitor?
Get with it, Apple!
Get with it, Apple!
This question keeps popping up and I see it happening some day, but not soon.When will we be able to plug an iPhone into a USB-C monitor, connect to a mouse and keyboard via bluetooth, and run MacOS on the monitor?
Get with it, Apple!

This question keeps popping up and I see it happening some day, but not soon.
In any case, this is not the real question for me because this is not anything I'd do with my iPhone until I can definitively be told that I can do the following:
View attachment 2621848
That's 10 displays my Mac Pro is driving, 5 of which are 30" Cinema Displays and one display being a 55" HDTV.
So far I keep hearing that what I do/have is not possible with an iPhone. Even if that iPhone is running MacOS.
My apologies to those who keep seeing this popup in threads like this. But people keep making threads with the same question.
As I said, one day this will happen. It's just not now. In the future, your friends will be able to do this.Not everyone is working for Disneyland or Disney Hollywood Studios.
I don't have a smart phone, but expect there are people out there who want to plug in and drive 1 PC monitor with an iphone. I have friends without a laptop, tablet or desktop PC and their only gateway to the modern world is a smart phone.
Well he asked for one monitor. which is fine for 98% of people.This question keeps popping up and I see it happening some day, but not soon.
In any case, this is not the real question for me because this is not anything I'd do with my iPhone until I can definitively be told that I can do the following:
View attachment 2621848
That's 10 displays my Mac Pro is driving, 5 of which are 30" Cinema Displays and one display being a 55" HDTV.
So far I keep hearing that what I do/have is not possible with an iPhone. Even if that iPhone is running MacOS.
My apologies to those who keep seeing this popup in threads like this. But people keep making threads with the same question.
Then why ask? Why the interest if not to actually substitute the device for a computer? Wouldn't that be the entire point? So you'd never need a computer?Well he asked for one monitor. which is fine for 98% of people.
No one expects to replace a mac pro with an iphone.
It's 10 and it allows me to dedicate displays to different windows and documents from the same or different apps, as well as keep app palettes out of the way. It means I can have multiple apps open at once and not have anything hidden behind another app's windows.Btw what do you do on 20 diplays except of dispaying elfs and wizards?
What is wrong with virtual desktops?Then why ask? Why the interest if not to actually substitute the device for a computer? Wouldn't that be the entire point? So you'd never need a computer?
Asking opened the door, even if it's just about one monitor. I am simply stating that this will never do for me - and showing why it won't.
It's 10 and it allows me to dedicate displays to different windows and documents from the same or different apps, as well as keep app palettes out of the way. It means I can have multiple apps open at once and not have anything hidden behind another app's windows.
I just tend to take pictures with the desktop showing is all.
Nothing. Just not the way I work.What is wrong with virtual desktops?
Well cos 1 monitor (or maybe 2 with 4k) would be now possible without any hardware changes to the iphone.Then why ask? Why the interest if not to actually substitute the device for a computer? Wouldn't that be the entire point? So you'd never need a computer?
Asking opened the door, even if it's just about one monitor. I am simply stating that this will never do for me - and showing why it won't.
It's 10 and it allows me to dedicate displays to different windows and documents from the same or different apps, as well as keep app palettes out of the way. It means I can have multiple apps open at once and not have anything hidden behind another app's windows.
I just tend to take pictures with the desktop showing is all.
The hardware you describe is basically the Neo which is iphone 16pro levelJa. Probably need to boost the SSD a lot for that to be practical to hold macOS and macOS applications.
More SSD, more RAM ... gonna wind up boosting cost of the phone 1.5x to 2x mebbe.
Well its already kind of like that. But also not. While the pro and ultra chips are similar built they are physically substantial larger cos of space for additional cores etc.I predict in the not-too-distant future, 'M' chips and 'A' chips will be merged. And if you combine the 'C' modem chips... the MAC chip. A Mac powered by MAC. An iPhone powered by MAC. An Apple Watch powered by MAC.
The same chip deployed across all Apple devices, including Apple watches. The cheaper ones have a chip that has fewer cores, is underclocked etc.
Apple Silicon and the divorce with Intel was the best thing that happened to Apple. Observe the mess on the other side with Intel, Qualcomm, Microsoft and various Windows OEMs all fumbling hard.
Microsoft should learn from Apple on how to push/not push an account on users i.e. Microsoft account vs Apple account.
Apple should learn from Microsoft on how NOT to push A.I onto users i.e. Copilot shoved in your face.
What does that mean? That Apple will reduce the number of chips in one generation from 4/5 (A19, A19 Pro, M5, M5 Pro, M5 Max) to fewer than that? The A vs. M is just branding and has no deeper technical meaning. The A12X might as well have been an M0. Or the M1 might as well have been called the A14X.I predict in the not-too-distant future, 'M' chips and 'A' chips will be merged.
That was said until the day before Apple removed the USB-A ports from the Macbooks.As long as the Mac exists, never.