Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kmichalec

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 14, 2010
904
309
I was wondering if anyone has done an experiment to see how much data the Maps app uses serving up all those Maps and 3D renderings? Now that Verizon and AT&T are steering us away from the unlimited plans, I'm wondering how much more data I'll be using each month if I use Maps to drive back and forth from work and home each day for my 2 total hours of commute time. Anyone tested that? Maybe check to see how much data you've used before starting Maps, and then how much after? I haven't upgraded yet, otherwise I'd test it myself.
 
It's vector-based instead of the panels used in the former version, so probably less than before.

I'm interested to know as well.
 
Installed iOS6 last night, and tested this morning on my drive into work in the Detroit area. 50 minute drive 33 miles (one way). Used 960KB down/316 KB up. Pretty reasonable.

Here's a detailed answer, for those who have trouble turning to page 5:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1442047/


Thanks, but the post referenced above was people discussing the Beta/GM builds. It's not unreasonable to see what real world performance is like from people using the public release now that it's available...for those that have trouble contributing without the pretentious comments.
 
...for those that have trouble contributing without the pretentious comments.
Hey, I'm just trying to help. Not many have the time to look through 5 pages. It's easier for me since I posted my results there and I'm not going to rewrite them here when my shift starts in 5 hours. There's nothing wrong with my GM build results. It's comparable to yours. And your welcome.
 
Hey, I'm just trying to help. Not many have the time to look through 5 pages. It's easier for me since I posted my results there and I'm not going to rewrite them here when my shift starts in 5 hours. There's nothing wrong with my GM build results. It's comparable to yours. And your welcome.

Agreed, but it would have been just as easy to say, "Hey. I started a similar thread here {link} which might answer your question." The snarky page 5 reference wasn't necessary. And I never said anything was wrong with your GM build results, but Apple can adjust things between the GM release and the final. Likely? No. Possible? Yes. Why can't I ask the general public what they are seeing, now that it's publicly released? I appreciate the fact that you already did this test and I thank you for your input.
 
I used Apple maps for a 25 mile, 30 minute trip with navigation and it used 477kb. I used it in the Metro Detroit area.
 
I use it once or twice a week and haven't seen any significant rise in my data plan (200 mb as I'm on wifi everywhere).

I previously used navigon with traffic but they have been absolutely peeving me. It's next to impossible to store a device and not have to redo navigon.

That said I don't use traffic data o pn apple maps, if it exists. And it's certainly not as feature rich as other apps...however unscientific ally it seems to use a whole lot less battery.

Sorry for the resurrection. Just wanted to post an experience after six weeks or so.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.