The Mad Kiwi said:
You'd actually need to put $150k of your $250k back into the original investment to counter inflation of say 3%. So if you're only earning 5% you'd only be able to spend $100k.
You do raise some good points but for the following reasons I think $5 million is my minimum entry point.
1) 5% is a conservative estimate for growth, if invested wisely 7%-10% could be seen which would provide some buffer for inflation.
2) I didn't say I would stop working, probably just work half or 3/4 time since I kind of like my job, and knowing I don't
need the job makes it even less stressful.
3) Where I live more house than we would ever need would currently run $300-400K.
4) Let's say I have 2 kids and through investing/working we manage to keep the original $5 million intact. Ok, yes, each only gets half of a good house, but guess what, they also inherit the house we were living in... so now each child has a good house.
I'm not saying I would turn down more but if I ran into an eccentric billionaire doing this for as many people as he can I'd probably only ask for the $5 million (after taxes of course) to enable him to spread the wealth to as many people as he can (hopefully he's running some sort of screening to find other reasonable people like me otherwise I might be tempted to take it all and do the screening myself).
If you want to prove me wrong send me $5 million dollars and contact me in 20 years to see if I am keeping ahead of inflation. If not you can proudly claim you proved me wrong.
