I would love if there is a way to make the menu bar black for all applications instead of translucent. This way you get the benefit of the extra screen area without drawing attention to the notch.
I think the increased pixel density also counters your logic. There’s (likely) more vertical pixels on this thing. So, the intrusion of the notch is either nullified by it being in the menu bar (where an app would not have used them anyway), or it will be in a “virtual bezel” (dead zone), where an older model would’ve had no pixels.Can you confirm that the new MacBook Pro 16” is 16.x inches and not 16.0 inches?
Otherwise, they just added a notch and you lost that screen real estate.
Pixels don’t count, because the DPI varies (a 21” and a 23” monitor can both be 1080p).
Apple has been moving more toward "hide and go seek" for the UI elements on screen where you don't see them unless you know precisely where to hover the mouse. Now they've taken it one step further where the mouse can also be hidden.
No, that is the only rational way to deal with the mouse pointer. It would be a friction point if it stopped at the edge or moved around it.Travels behind the notch . . . sounds like an afterthought.
I think the increased pixel density also counters your logic. There’s (likely) more vertical pixels on this thing. So, the intrusion of the notch is either nullified by it being in the menu bar (where an app would not have used them anyway), or it will be in a “virtual bezel” (dead zone), where an older model would’ve had no pixels.
Maybe it’s just me but I’ve noticed macOS has a problem with hiding mouse during full screen video.Yes - any thing else sounds like an excuse "a convenient hiding spot for the mouse"... lame.
When watch movies, the mouse cursor should disappear.
( I don't particular care about the notch, but the excuses for how it could be useful are lame + sad )
Am I the only one that just sends it all the way to the right of the screen? Not hidden entirely but close enough.This actually makes me like the notch. (Before I didn't care). When I'm writing full screen I hate seeing the mouse. If this means I can just toss it up and have it hide from view that's a great feature.
Well, I’m being lazy/don’t care. But, I suppose the answer is in the vertical pixel count of old MBP 16.0”, new 16.2”, and how many pixels “high” the notch is. If the new vertical minus notch is greater, then this screen has more real estate.That’s the question!
Is it 16.0” of notch-less real estate with more pixels?
Or 15.9” of notch-less real estate with more pixels?
I use at least one app with menus all the way across the bar on my 13 inch. I shudder to think how the 14 inch would handle this. Though, lots of items in the menu bar just seems to be an inherent limitation of the macOS UI. Seems to me the notch is just going to take what’s already a weakness of macOS and make it worse.I hope that they give us an option to use a dark mode menu palette while using light mode for the main screen. I don’t like dark mode in general but it would do a lot to hide the notch and keep the menu bar functional
I suspect they would auto shift to the right side. I mean, you’re just talking about relocating text and drop-downs.I would like to know what happens when there are many menus / menubar items, such that stretch upto or beyond the notch.
Well, I’m being lazy/don’t care. But, I suppose the answer is in the vertical pixel count of old MBP 16.0”, new 16.2”, and how many pixels “high” the notch is. If the new vertical minus notch is greater, then this screen has more real estate.
Just use a wallpaper with a black line at the top of it.I would love if there is a way to make the menu bar black for all applications instead of translucent. This way you get the benefit of the extra screen area without drawing attention to the notch.
Not gonna happenMy God, enough with "The Notch"!
And still not, because if you were projecting or mirroring the display, the mouse wouldn't be very hidden.Am I the only one that just sends it all the way to the right of the screen? Not hidden entirely but close enough.
I wouldn’t go so far as to call this a feature. More like an unintended consequence of an idea that was not fully thought out.
The horizonal resolution is 384 pixels greater than the previous model. If the notch is 384 'pixels' wide, then the menu bar still has the same amount of space available and therefore everything that fits now should continue to fit.I would like to know what happens when there are many menus / menubar items, such that stretch upto or beyond the notch.
I might be in the minority, not sure, but I'd prefer to have less screen real estate and a larger bezel than to have the notch. Both MacBook and iPhone.I have no issues with the notch.
I absolutely don't understand all the notch haters who outdo each other at finding ever more extreme ways to express their disdain for the notch. I mean, seriously, how much can you hate such a relatively insignificant detail
It still seems ludicrous to me that people are complaining about getting more screen real estate.
If you have the choice between no notch with less screen real estate and a notch that can either allow for more screen real estate or look the same as if it weren't there, then the latter has only advantages and no disadvantages. The notch is all upside, no downside.