Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, look at the big brain on Brad!

So, was your test successful? Did the photo of the Apple Watch have enough verisimilitude to fool the companion app? I'm guessing you didn't get very far in your test.

Here's the test I want to see: Once you have an actual Apple Watch in hand, try the pairing process. However, instead of showing it your new watch, you show it the photo. If it still pairs, I'll be convinced.

Simple mention of high IQ is so painful to some people so they start attacking. Early childhood trauma? Whatever.

I'm not here to convince you, just expressed my opinion. If you want to see that test then do it yourself. But the idea of a watch screen emitting invisible signals was so smart and technically feasible that I'm sure that's how pairing will work.

And yes, the photo had enough verisimilitude, that was a dumb question.
 
I think this is the best guess so far... Except that it would only with with the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus.

Well met. I guess I just assumed everyone had an iPhone 6, hehe.

Maybe at the back of the watch booklet, it says "Supported on iPhone 5 and higher*"




"* except for pairing, you need to upgrade for phone for that"
 
Simple mention of high IQ is so painful to some people so they start attacking. Early childhood trauma? Whatever.

I'm not here to convince you, just expressed my opinion. If you want to see that test then do it yourself. But the idea of a watch screen emitting invisible signals was so smart and technically feasible that I'm sure that's how pairing will work.

And yes, the photo had enough verisimilitude, that was a dumb question.

Who's attacking? I was just quoting Pulp Fiction.

Maybe I mis-typed. I didn't mean to imply that it would beam out some invisible ray containing a cryptographic datastream. I meant that I believe it would be possible to modulate the screen - or just a few pixels - in such a way as to transfer a small amount of information. I never claimed it was a smart idea. Just an idea. Yeah, no, you're correct though. Modulating a light source to communicate information is a silly idea. It'll never work.

This conjecture is obviously moot, however, as your superior intellect and programming experience has allowed you to successfully pair your iPhone with a picture of an Apple Watch. Congratulations.

I'm going to go and try to heal the gaping emotional wound you left by publicly exposing my childhood trauma. :(
 
What an awkward pairing issue ....

Hold your watch to the camera ?

What about a code u enter ... that's how it works normally... But I guess Apple wanted to go the 'cool' way
 
What an awkward pairing issue ....

Hold your watch to the camera ?

What about a code u enter ... that's how it works normally... But I guess Apple wanted to go the 'cool' way

- That would've meant having an awkward numeric input on the watch.

- They could've used NFC to pair, but they wanted to support older iPhones without NFC.

- The idea of using the camera to set something up is not new, but simplifies things:

1. As some have pointed out, the watch screen can subtly indicate a code for the phone to use.
2. Only the phone directly looking at the watch can get the code to pair.
3. Even a non-techie who's never paired anything in their life can do it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.