Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bit gutted this doesn't work on my iMac, but does work on my MBP at least.
 
lmao what a tinfoil hat way of living...
btw touch id breaks your point of 'security'
Its a shame you have to hide things from your lovers, GL w/ that. BTW why are you using your personal computer for work related stuff and why are you taking it to your office and also leaving your iPhone unattended that long so that your evil co-worker has enough time to use it, unlock your personal computer and find random secret files so that he can do whatever lmao.
I don't have a jealous lover or a backstabbing coworker. Those were just hypothetical examples.

To give you another example that does happen in my home: I have four kids (ages 1-3) who are very smart and fascinated by computers and phones and remote controls. They haven't figured out passwords yet, but it doesn't stop them from trying. If i had a document open and working on it, a three-year-old could easily do a lot of damage in the time it takes me to change a one-year-old's diaper.

As for Touch ID, yes, that would keep it secure. I'd like to see TouchID on the next MBP. But unlocking my computer with the TouchID on my phone would not be as convenient as using the Apple Watch. My phone is usually in my pocket, but sometimes on a charger several feet away. I'd have to dig it out of my pocket or go unplug it and take it near my computer. I may as well just type the password!
 
It unlocks the currently logged in and active account (I.e the one on the lock screen): you can't use it to actually log in to the computer.

That will be interesting (I don't have my new AW2 yet), because I frequently jump in and out of both accounts in the same day (different businesses on the one machine). Gotta see how this works!
 
The option doesn't appear on my Early 2013 MBP which really sucks. However, one weird thing I spotted whilst investigating is that my MBP shows my Apple Watch as running WatchOS 2.2.1 when it's actually running WatchOS 3.0. Anyone else seeing this or know why it's showing incorrect or know a fix for it?
 
Wondering how it works with multiple users. Can I assume that multiple users with Apple Watches in the same household would each auto-unlock their own separate Mac user account? That would be neat—avoid even having to specify who you are, maybe? It unlocks to whoever is physically closest?
Doesn't work with account switching. It only seems to unlock an account you've already logged into and let the screensaver/sleep activate on. Switching from my wife's account back to mine requires me to type in my password again.
 
Of course it can technically be done with all the devices. All you, or your significant other, or your sneaky colleague would need to do is to hold your iPhone close to your locked computer, and voila! All your files are available for you (or that guy who wants to steal your work and take credit for it, or that jealous lover who wants to read your emails) to do with as you or they please. It couldn't be any more convenient.

But Apple chose to make it so it only works with an unlocked Apple Watch, which presumably only you have the code to unlock, strapped to your wrist. It's like they think your jealous lover or backstabbing co-worker don't have any business surfing through the files on your computer without your permission.

There's this pretty cool new thing on the 'latest' iPhone called touchID. Sure would be pretty handy to popup a prompt on my phone to unlock my laptop. Hmm, now that I think about it, they DO do something like that with ApplePay. Someone should let them know that's too cumbersome for some people and should have it removed!
[doublepost=1474465148][/doublepost]
I don't have a jealous lover or a backstabbing coworker. Those were just hypothetical examples.

To give you another example that does happen in my home: I have four kids (ages 1-3) who are very smart and fascinated by computers and phones and remote controls. They haven't figured out passwords yet, but it doesn't stop them from trying. If i had a document open and working on it, a three-year-old could easily do a lot of damage in the time it takes me to change a one-year-old's diaper.

As for Touch ID, yes, that would keep it secure. I'd like to see TouchID on the next MBP. But unlocking my computer with the TouchID on my phone would not be as convenient as using the Apple Watch. My phone is usually in my pocket, but sometimes on a charger several feet away. I'd have to dig it out of my pocket or go unplug it and take it near my computer. I may as well just type the password!

Would still be more convenient then NO FEATURE AT ALL!
[doublepost=1474465946][/doublepost]
There is a clear discrepancy between the macOS upgrade page you reference and the Unlock your Mac with Apple Watch KB article (https://support.apple.com/kb/PH25156?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US) -- the former suggests that all 2013 Retina MBP support the Unlock your Mac with Apple Watch feature while the KB article says only mid-2013 Retina MBPs are supported.

It is clear that the KB article is accurate based on the results with my early 2013 15" Retina MBP.

I've ordered the Broadcom Bt 4.0 Wireless 802.11ac Wifi Card Module (Bcm94360cs Bcm94360csax Bcm4360 Bluetooth) for Apple Laptop A1398 A1502 653-0029 to see if this will enable the feature .

Based on the Amazon reviews and questions/answers this appears to be a promising step. It is scheduled to be delivered on Thursday. I will report my results here.

The card can be viewed/ordered here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PDN4H9E/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1)

Thanks for the link. Ordered the card and looking forward to getting this to work.
[doublepost=1474466091][/doublepost]
lol what? same difference, tell me why it won't work? You carry both of them with you. Just like you can do purchases w touch id on your mac you can also unlock your mac w your iPhone close by and if you are scared you can press your finger w touch id, its even more secure than your watch. This is a technology that can be applied w any apple portable device.

I don't get how people justify not providing the feature on the iPhone due to 'security concerns', but not realize that anyone can put your watch on, and now your Mac's password is relegated to a 4 digit pin.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
I've just upgraded my mid-2012 15" rMBP with a BCM94360CSAX card, and it works for me. Under system report the wifi lists as supporting Watch unlock, and the option appears in system preferences.

I'd recommend following the ifixit article. I used a plastic spudger to get the antennas off and push them onto the new card, and to ping the battery connector off. Need a torx 5 for the airport card.

Make sure your watch is near the mac when enabling it (as it would be with your hands at the keyboard). I tried pairing with the MacBook to the side of me and it kept failing to find the Watch, despite seeing the little dots on the Bluetooth icon. and handoff working. After I sat with it in my lap it worked straight away.

I had some fun doing the 2FA dance earlier in the week since I was on 2-step still. I found that signing out of iCloud on the iPhone, then signing back in with 2FA enabled the sign in option under accounts in the Watch app. After signing in again in the Watch app the Watch shows as trusted under iCloud - Devices.

Thanks for the details. Looking forward to getting this working.
 
Why is this limited to only the watch? Real Question - is this a technical issue?

Say you have a passcode on your Watch. You enter the passcode and the Watch only remains unlocked as long as it's on your wrist. Your wrist is near the computer when you open the screen, it recognizes this (using 802.11ac wifi, according to ArsTechnica, which is why only newer Macs support this) and unlocks the computer.

If it allowed your iPhone to unlock your Mac when the iPhone is locked, anyone could get into your computer by snagging your iPhone. If it allowed your iPhone to unlock the Mac but only when the iPhone itself is unlocked, is that really any more convenient? You still have to unlock something, and while TouchID is likely faster than entering your Mac's passcode, it requires you getting it out which is a bit counterintuitive.

People love to rip on Apple here lately, I've noticed, but I think they did a good job of implementing this. It definitely makes sense that it's a Watch-only feature.

The Ars Technica Sierra review: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/09/macos-10-12-sierra-the-ars-technica-review/
 
...
I don't get how people justify not providing the feature on the iPhone due to 'security concerns', but not realize that anyone can put your watch on, and now your Mac's password is relegated to a 4 digit pin.
Its the feeling of 'exclusivity' and having something others don't have. This is the people that buy stuff to show off more than to use.
 
Its the feeling of 'exclusivity' and having something others don't have. This is the people that buy stuff to show off more than to use.

lol, like the world's most sold smartphone and smartwatch? The one literally sold out every year for weeks after release.
 
Wondering how it works with multiple users. Can I assume that multiple users with Apple Watches in the same household would each auto-unlock their own separate Mac user account? That would be neat—avoid even having to specify who you are, maybe? It unlocks to whoever is physically closest?

It's tied to an Apple ID. So unless multiple people in the same household are logged into the same Apple ID for iCloud (generally a bad idea unless you enjoy sharing all of your contacts and photos with each other), this shouldn't be an issue.

I only have one Watch so I haven't yet seen it in person, but I did see a video where it showed a list of Apple Watches allowed to unlock a particular Mac in System Preferences > Security and Privacy. Mine just has a check mark by "Allow Your Apple Watch to unlock your Mac."
 
lol, like the world's most sold smartphone and smartwatch? The one literally sold out every year for weeks after release.

Smartwatches are a tinyyyyyy fragment of the watch market then you subdivide that into the apple watch itself, you can see a few in the wild but its not something everyone around you wears.
 
There's this pretty cool new thing on the 'latest' iPhone called touchID. Sure would be pretty handy to popup a prompt on my phone to unlock my laptop. Hmm, now that I think about it, they DO do something like that with ApplePay. Someone should let them know that's too cumbersome for some people and should have it removed!
ApplePay is a different situation. It comes up because the user initiated a purchase on a web page. So they know beforehand that they will need their phone to authenticate (at least until Apple releases Macs with TouchID). Also ApplePay helps keep your credit card data secure by only sending the tokenized number to the vendor.

Think about it: Unlocking your computer with your Watch is pretty seamless. You sit down at your computer and it unlocks for you automagically. The password prompt doesn't even appear. Just a notice that your watch is being used to unlock the screen, followed by a reassuring tap from your wrist.

Now, with the phone, you would receive a handy alert from the phone in your pocket. You pull out your phone and authenticate with TouchID. Simple. And if you decide you'd rather not get your phone out, you have the option of entering your passcode, after ten seconds, when the computer realizes you aren't going to authenticate using TouchID.

Would still be more convenient then NO FEATURE AT ALL!
I get it: This feature does you no good if you don't have an Apple Watch, or if you have one but don't wear it, or if you hate Bluetooth and never turn it on. Universal cut and paste only supports iOS and macOS devices, so you can't copy from your Mac and paste on your Galaxy Note 7. Handoff is also only good for people who own more than one Apple device. It's how they get you roped into the whole Apple ecosystem.

But I don't agree that having a cumbersome feature that requires you to get your phone out to unlock your computer is more convenient than simply typing your password. That seems like the kind of gimmicky feature that most would turn off once they realized it wasn't saving them any time.

Unlocking with the Watch on the other hand, really does save time. And it can lead to more security. When testing, I realized that I had set my computer to lock five minutes after going to sleep. I was tired of going for a glass of water and having to enter my password when I got back. With the Watch to authenticate, I changed the setting to go to sleep sooner and to lock five seconds after going to sleep. Unlocking is no longer a chore, so I no longer leave my computer unlocked for long periods.
 
Doesn't work on my late 2012 iMac either - considering theres only been one spec bump refresh since I bought it, I kinda thought it would work - oh well that's the fun of owning Apple stuff eh!
 
It's not working for me. After having to screw around a bunch with MFA, I finally got everything setup.
When I try to login, however, It says "Authenticating with Apple Watch" for about 10 seconds and then gives up and presents me with a password field. Yes, my watch is on my wrist!
 
ApplePay is a different situation. It comes up because the user initiated a purchase on a web page. So they know beforehand that they will need their phone to authenticate (at least until Apple releases Macs with TouchID). Also ApplePay helps keep your credit card data secure by only sending the tokenized number to the vendor.

Think about it: Unlocking your computer with your Watch is pretty seamless. You sit down at your computer and it unlocks for you automagically. The password prompt doesn't even appear. Just a notice that your watch is being used to unlock the screen, followed by a reassuring tap from your wrist.

Now, with the phone, you would receive a handy alert from the phone in your pocket. You pull out your phone and authenticate with TouchID. Simple. And if you decide you'd rather not get your phone out, you have the option of entering your passcode, after ten seconds, when the computer realizes you aren't going to authenticate using TouchID.


I get it: This feature does you no good if you don't have an Apple Watch, or if you have one but don't wear it, or if you hate Bluetooth and never turn it on. Universal cut and paste only supports iOS and macOS devices, so you can't copy from your Mac and paste on your Galaxy Note 7. Handoff is also only good for people who own more than one Apple device. It's how they get you roped into the whole Apple ecosystem.

But I don't agree that having a cumbersome feature that requires you to get your phone out to unlock your computer is more convenient than simply typing your password. That seems like the kind of gimmicky feature that most would turn off once they realized it wasn't saving them any time.

Unlocking with the Watch on the other hand, really does save time. And it can lead to more security. When testing, I realized that I had set my computer to lock five minutes after going to sleep. I was tired of going for a glass of water and having to enter my password when I got back. With the Watch to authenticate, I changed the setting to go to sleep sooner and to lock five seconds after going to sleep. Unlocking is no longer a chore, so I no longer leave my computer unlocked for long periods.

Not gimmicky if you use a complex password, which I'm sure everyone does. (/s for the last part). But seriously, a good chunk of people take their phones out and put it on their desk (especially the plus series as those are unwieldy to sit with in your pocket). Dare I say that more people have their phones sitting in front of them on their desks then there are people with watches on their wrists. And again, if it's too 'cumbersome' to unlock your computer, how is it not for Apple Pay? I'm not denying that the watch will provide a more seamless and better experience. But you can't deny that the only reason not to offer it on the iPhone is purely to sell more watches. They obviously made ApplePay work with the iPhone because they get a cut of every sale. That's the type of greed coming from Apple that irritates me.

Full disclosure, I have the iPhone 7+, Watch2, and will be buying the latest MacBookPro once it's released. I even bought the adapter to make it work with my current 2012. I'm an Apple fan, but that doesn't mean I can't criticize them.
 
It's not working for me. After having to screw around a bunch with MFA, I finally got everything setup.
When I try to login, however, It says "Authenticating with Apple Watch" for about 10 seconds and then gives up and presents me with a password field. Yes, my watch is on my wrist!

I'm having exactly the same issue ! It authenticates my Watch for a few seconds, then brings up the usual password field ..
What gives ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Cant get mine to work. I get a error that my iMac was unable to communicate with watch.
Make sure your Apple Watch is unlocked, on your wrist, and powered on. I have tried restarting the iMac and watch. Late 2015 iMac, Apple watch one.

Same situation, and I get the same message on both my 2015 iMac and 2016 MacBook. Don't want to get into signing out of iCloud on all my devices, because it can be a pain to sign back in.
 
Went to set this up on the GM version and it showed the option to "unlock mac with apple watch". However when I tried to turn it on, it said I need to activate 2 factor authentication and turn of 2 step verification. I did all that and the option went away and has never returned. Not sure what happened. Signed in to all devices with my account. No go.

I had to Unpair my Watch from my iPhone and then Pair it back again. Otherwise I could not get it to show up as a trusted device after switching to two-factor authentication no matter what else I tried. It was a pain, but I finally have it working now.
 
Cant get mine to work. I get a error that my iMac was unable to communicate with watch.
Make sure your Apple Watch is unlocked, on your wrist, and powered on. I have tried restarting the iMac and watch. Late 2015 iMac, Apple watch one.
Same!
 
But you can't deny that the only reason not to offer it on the iPhone is purely to sell more watches.
I can deny that's the only reason. And what's more, I do.
[doublepost=1474484035][/doublepost]
Cant get mine to work. I get a error that my iMac was unable to communicate with watch.
Make sure your Apple Watch is unlocked, on your wrist, and powered on. I have tried restarting the iMac and watch. Late 2015 iMac, Apple watch one.
Mine works with my iMac (also late 2015). One thing I found was that your watch has to be within about 18 inches (give or take) from the computer. No problem on my MBP, but my iMac has a bluetooth keyboard and trackpad, which are sometimes farther from the computer. So sometimes I get a message that the wifi signal is not strong enough.
[doublepost=1474484510][/doublepost]
How is sierra's system better than the macID app, which can put your mac to sleep when you leave it, turn it on automatically when you approach (proximity) etc? (I'm having trouble getting the sierra unlock to work, so maybe that explains my grumbling)
If it works, it's better because it is integral to the OS. The macID app is a bolt-on utility. Sometimes these bolt-ons work by exploiting some security flaw or find an ingeniously cool (but unsupported) method for controlling Apple's UI. One innocuous change by Apple to fix a vulnerability or improve their UI could cause the bolt-on to stop working correctly.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.