Once you go touch, you can never go back. Not having it is just not an option. Given that using it is an option, I just don't get why non-touch is still offered.
Once you go touch, you can never go back. Not having it is just not an option. Given that using it is an option, I just don't get why non-touch is still offered.
Logic fail there buddy.So what?
People who care about one thing and not the others, care about that thing and not the others. Does a racehorse jockey need to be interested in sports cars? Does a photographer need to be interested in knitting? I am not sure it matters... whatsoever. If you're happy riding a bike in London, do you care what kind of noodles someone's eating in China, that moment?
If you find that example bizarre, it was meant to express irrelevance - who cares what "the others" are using, when you are using the best. Tunnel vision is a great thing - helps one to focus. What the rest of the world does? Meh, don't care.
I'd like a touchscreen for being able to draw, that coupled with a 360deg hinge or twist 180, I'm sure Apple could do it, as they say can't innovate my ass...Yeah Nope. Never gonna buy that one. Looks like a disaster. Although Im glad it doesn't have a touch screen. Having a touchscreen on a laptop seems plain retarded.
Thinner is not the same as innovative. Thinner is doing the same as others but to a greater extent.
Apologies if someone already made this point. I couldn't face searching 30 pages of posts.
Winds me up just as much as companies claiming their products are revolutionary. They really aren't.