Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd like to see something that includes both functions of the Time Capsule and Apple TV, with at least two easily swappable drive bays (RAID capable).
 
I have the EX845! I love the thing mine is packed with over 4TB of storage space. Yes I have about 65% of it filled up at this time.

One thing I see missed here, HP is offering support for Mac and for system users like myself I have both Mac and PC all playing in harmony.

Will Apple offer something better than tc maybe but by that time I would have to buy the 10TB version and my bet is Apple would not make it expandable.
 
I'm still sorta wondering why you would need a dual core processor to run a file server, unless you're setting it up as a processing farm for graphics, etc.

Still, it both looks and sounds pretty awesome.

It can do automatic video encoding. That would be the only reason, but a big reason I think. I need to start saving up for the 495
 
HP EX49x seem like nice products, but like others have said, I want Apple's product. I am hoping Time Capsule is Apple's way of testing the water. With many households having multiple computers, I think the time is right for home server. My list of features:
  • iTunes Home Sharing server
  • iCal Server (CalDAV) for centralizing calendar events
  • Address Book Server (CardDAV) for centralizing address book
  • Time Machine backup
  • AirPort disk
  • Printer sharing
  • MobileMe integration
  • 4 hotswappable internal SATA drive bays
  • 2 USB ports, 802.11n, gigabit ethernet
  • Streaming to Apple TV

Apple sells that. It's called an XServe.

Actually, minus the 4 hotswappable internal SATA drive bays, you could do that with a Mini and Snow Leopard Server. It'd be much cheaper than
an Xserve.

In fact, I just might do that!
 
Hey everybody, some good discussion here. I wanted to clarify a couple points I saw mentioned. HP have committed to providing the 3.0 software for previous generations of the MediaSmart Server, so yes, present owners of the EX47x and EX48x should be able to get perform this update in the Fall. As for availability, they are available for pre-order now and I believe they will be available in October. Another bit of good news is that the servers will once again be available in Europe.

I've got all this info and a ton more in my review, if anyone is looking for more details. Thanks for the link in the blog post.
http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/09/14/review-hp-mediasmart-server-ex490-and-ex495/
 
The problem I have with these types of computers is the same box does storage and media. I'd rather have a ZFS NAS box with ECC handling storage, and an essentially diskless front end machine handling audio, video, and human interface duties.
 
Well I have had both in the house and the Thecus N5200 Pro just was not a good fit at all.

Price wise vs hardware I have to argue with you a bit.
The hardware is much better in the HP media 490 series even the 48x series is much better.

For functions like encoding when not backing up that 1.5 Ghz celeron M is just too slow. Take that and pair it to 512K ram and you have a really slow machine. Now I know you don't need power in your server rig but it is nice to have a little more power when you need it. I would even forgive this horrible setup if it was a silent machine but it was about twice as loud as my HP mediasmart 485.

The internet interface was horrible in my opinion and nothing close to the ease of the hp interface.

Price: well I will just use newegg as a standard

Thecus pro= $649.99 no hard drive
HP Mediasmart 490=$549.99 with 1 TB

In addition for any redundancy in the NAS you need at least 2 Hard drives.

I like to come to the forum and help people make an informed decision as well.

Thanks for your input, I was looking for the opinion of someone having tried both :)
 
I see your point, but the HP 47x series is really old hardware. Sure it is easy to upgrade the software side but the server is going to run like a pig. The hp 48x series has a faster processor (celeron 2 Ghz) and 2 gb of memory. It can handle the new software and functions much better. The hp 47x series was a first attempt at backing up people's computers with relative ease. It worked very well for that function. Software update 2.5 brought video encoding and streaming into the server. The old 512K of ram and 1.8 Ghz sempron processor just can't cut it. HP should have come out and stated they will not be upgrading the software due to hardware limitations. I mean the new 490 only has the celeron 2.2Ghz 64bit processor and everything else is the same. There is no reason to not allow the 48x customers to update.

LOL! I'm afraid not. I'm running the 2.5 update on my 470 and it is working fine. No problems here. I recently updated it to 2 GB RAM, and noticed it does go slightly faster when you are connected via Remote Desktop - however it previously managed to stream a movie to my MB, a song to my iPod Touch and carry out both Time Machine and Windows backups all at the same time with no issues. The only issue is that the drive lights don't light up any more, (driver issue), which I'm sure HP will fix when they bring out the official 2.5 for 47x release.

If you dig around on wegotserved.net, they have a guide showing how to install the 2.x updates on the 47x series
 
How well does the iTunes library sharing work with AppleTV

Hi

Does anyone have experience yet of how well this server works with AppleTV? Like many others I would like to export all my iLife media to this server and then consume it seemlessly from iTunes & iPhoto "client" on my main Mac, from an AppleTV box, from an Airport Express (for audio of course, using iTunes client on Mac or iPod Touch Remote control) etc.

Can anyone advise if this box is the magic bullet?

Also I would like to ensure that any iTunes Account purchases (my wife and I have our own iTunes Store accounts and seperate user accounts on the main Mac) are all sync/copied over to the server and freely accessable on my max. five Apple consuming devices.

Hope someone can clarify this! ;-)

Cheers

PS: Sorry - maybe about to answer my own question. A little more reading leads me to think no ;-(. The issue is that AppleTV and iPhone / iPodTouch register with an iTunes application (running on Mac or Win) and not with the embedded third party "iTunes Server". So unless / until HP can duplicate this functionality from iTunes application - or Apple beat HP at this game, its no HP MediaSmart for me ;-( And I have even warmed up by CreditCard!!
 
Home Server

This is where Apple should go.

For years people here have been asking for a mid tower system, TC is too small, do not have all the same services of the HP, OSX Server (unlimited license) is now only 499.

Making a system based on OSX Server with media streaming and everything else that comes with the OSX Server, would address the needs of small companies and also address the home market. It would also provide TM backup of downstream workstations and full user authorization to files and features. But one thing will be needed ...... The box would need to come with two gigabit ethernet ports so it can be used as a firewall.

I would pickup 2 of them, one for a Firewall and another for internal media server, file server and anything else. $800-900 pricepoint would do for me.

Will you listen Apple?
 
A purpose build home storage server is still a very much of a niche product. Between the Time Capsule and Mini, Apple has the bases covered.

A combined TC/Mini type product is unlikely to sell in large numbers, and I just don't see Apple making anything like that in the foreseeable future.

Except for the most important base: simplicity.
 
Hi

Does anyone have experience yet of how well this server works with AppleTV? Like many others I would like to export all my iLife media to this server and then consume it seemlessly from iTunes & iPhoto "client" on my main Mac, from an AppleTV box, from an Airport Express (for audio of course, using iTunes client on Mac or iPod Touch Remote control) etc.

Can anyone advise if this box is the magic bullet?

Also I would like to ensure that any iTunes Account purchases (my wife and I have our own iTunes Store accounts and seperate user accounts on the main Mac) are all sync/copied over to the server and freely accessable on my max. five Apple consuming devices.

Hope someone can clarify this! ;-)

Cheers

PS: Sorry - maybe about to answer my own question. A little more reading leads me to think no ;-(. The issue is that AppleTV and iPhone / iPodTouch register with an iTunes application (running on Mac or Win) and not with the embedded third party "iTunes Server". So unless / until HP can duplicate this functionality from iTunes application - or Apple beat HP at this game, its no HP MediaSmart for me ;-( And I have even warmed up by CreditCard!!

You can actually run iTunes on the HP MediaSmart server, it's running a variant of Windows Server 2003. You need to install it via remote desktop and leave it running in the background, it supposedly works great with AppleTV. :)
 
This is where Apple should go.

For years people here have been asking for a mid tower system, TC is too small, do not have all the same services of the HP, OSX Server (unlimited license) is now only 499.

Making a system based on OSX Server with media streaming and everything else that comes with the OSX Server, would address the needs of small companies and also address the home market. It would also provide TM backup of downstream workstations and full user authorization to files and features. But one thing will be needed ...... The box would need to come with two gigabit ethernet ports so it can be used as a firewall.

I would pickup 2 of them, one for a Firewall and another for internal media server, file server and anything else. $800-900 pricepoint would do for me.

Will you listen Apple?


This can all be done very easily with current hardware (or much older?...), it's just a software issue.

Looking at the features most people want, it seems that a simple itunes server option would cover a lot of it. I also think your price point is far too high considering what you're actually asking for, and I'm not a fan (at all...) of osx server.

I don't use itunes/time machine (but it's easy enough to get the library/image shared if that's all your after - if you can use google), and use freenas and monowall/pfsense on various boxes for a 'server' and firewalls - perhaps an option you could consider? Free and 'better', assuming you're top purchasing priorities aren't a shiny and branded aluminium box with a limited (but one-click) use :)
 
After an external hard drive failure, I got the following to backup all 4 bays of my Mac Pro. So far, so good, I can back up everything in all 4 bays with one click in Time Machine and it's expandable--right now, 4 1.5 TB SATA drives (good enough to back up 4 TB of total potential data) back up about 1.4 TB of actual data. Not bad.

What do people think of this?


www.drobo.com
 
After an external hard drive failure, I got the following to backup all 4 bays of my Mac Pro. So far, so good, I can back up everything in all 4 bays with one click in Time Machine and it's expandable--right now, 4 1.5 TB SATA drives (good enough to back up 4 TB of total potential data) back up about 1.4 TB of actual data. Not bad.

What do people think of this?


www.drobo.com

It's rather pricey ($1499 for the 0 TB model) - but easy to use and expand. Good fit for non-technical people with fat bank balances.

Unfortunately, no eSATA ports - so I'll pass on the Drobo and use an eSATA RAID.
 
This can all be done very easily with current hardware (or much older?...), it's just a software issue.

Looking at the features most people want, it seems that a simple itunes server option would cover a lot of it. I also think your price point is far too high considering what you're actually asking for, and I'm not a fan (at all...) of osx server.

I don't use itunes/time machine (but it's easy enough to get the library/image shared if that's all your after - if you can use google), and use freenas and monowall/pfsense on various boxes for a 'server' and firewalls - perhaps an option you could consider? Free and 'better', assuming you're top purchasing priorities aren't a shiny and branded aluminium box with a limited (but one-click) use :)

I get your point, and I have Linux esperience, but .....

The idea is to produce a box that non-techies can use and that it just works. If you have to drop into console to do anything, then it is not the right solution for the masses. It has to be 100% servicesable via a GUI with little to no techno-babble.

The other thing I stated is that it can be used as a standard server for small businesses (10 or less people). It is not just about music and video sharing, it is also about doing backups, share files by individuals and groups, setting up a web server, set up an application server, riun a blog, run ichat server, etc. All without expending 3000 on a Mac Pro that most households and small businesses can not afford.
 
Yeah, of course you're right.

What I mean was that for all that was mentioned, any current/old mac should be fine for the job. It just seems to me that osx/server/and its apps are limited, and it's worrying to me that people want yet another piece of apple branded hardware to fill the gap, when pretty much all that's needed is a few extra checkboxes in the itunes/tm/tc/etc preferences.

Media sharing/streaming, backups, webservers, blogs, application servers (hmmm) is all feasible with minimal hardware reqs, there's no real reason you can't have all these features on a TC/apple TV/etc box.

ps. freenas/monowall/pfsense are config'd through a web based gui for 99% of users and uses (and not linux based hehe) - but I understand that running apps like these aren't what 99% of 'average' users are going to do or consider (not that web/application servers are what most people want either...) - we are on a tech forum though :) I'd like to think that people here are after the best solutions, not just (artificially limited and expensive?) apple ones.
 
Hi

Does anyone have experience yet of how well this server works with AppleTV? Like many others I would like to export all my iLife media to this server and then consume it seemlessly from iTunes & iPhoto "client" on my main Mac, from an AppleTV box, from an Airport Express (for audio of course, using iTunes client on Mac or iPod Touch Remote control) etc.

Can anyone advise if this box is the magic bullet?

Also I would like to ensure that any iTunes Account purchases (my wife and I have our own iTunes Store accounts and seperate user accounts on the main Mac) are all sync/copied over to the server and freely accessable on my max. five Apple consuming devices.

Hope someone can clarify this! ;-)

Cheers

PS: Sorry - maybe about to answer my own question. A little more reading leads me to think no ;-(. The issue is that AppleTV and iPhone / iPodTouch register with an iTunes application (running on Mac or Win) and not with the embedded third party "iTunes Server". So unless / until HP can duplicate this functionality from iTunes application - or Apple beat HP at this game, its no HP MediaSmart for me ;-( And I have even warmed up by CreditCard!!

i think for music and video the answer is in fact yes, however not sure about applications, but for media, your connecting to the media store that contains all music.

quote of what i thought was a pretty good review above.

Hey everybody, some good discussion here. I wanted to clarify a couple points I saw mentioned. HP have committed to providing the 3.0 software for previous generations of the MediaSmart Server, so yes, present owners of the EX47x and EX48x should be able to get perform this update in the Fall. As for availability, they are available for pre-order now and I believe they will be available in October. Another bit of good news is that the servers will once again be available in Europe.

I've got all this info and a ton more in my review, if anyone is looking for more details. Thanks for the link in the blog post.
http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/09/14/review-hp-mediasmart-server-ex490-and-ex495/
 
If you dig around on wegotserved.net, they have a guide showing how to install the 2.x updates on the 47x series

Great to hear you got the 2.5 update working well, the tutorial and Add-In that Nigel Wilks and myself wrote is available here.

RudolfOSX said:
Does anyone have experience yet of how well this server works with AppleTV?

We've got an excellent Wiki article on getting the Apple TV working with your Windows Home Server, I'd suggest checking into this before you make your final decision. We've also got discussion in the forums about installing iTunes 9 on the Server and the users experiences after doing so.
 
Great to hear you got the 2.5 update working well, the tutorial and Add-In that Nigel Wilks and myself wrote is available here.



We've got an excellent Wiki article on getting the Apple TV working with your Windows Home Server, I'd suggest checking into this before you make your final decision. We've also got discussion in the forums about installing iTunes 9 on the Server and the users experiences after doing so.

Great link, though you might want to verify that Firefly can actually stream iTunes protected content. Your Wiki article says it can't. I have a homebuilt Ubuntu Linux NAS running Firefly and when I tried to stream a protected song to my MacBook Pro, I was presented with a dialog asking for the iTunes account info. After doing so I was able to stream the protected song. Also now that many songs are iTunes Plus it's really an irrelevant issue.
 
I WANT THIS.

I don't give a flip if Apple wants to make one. Why sould I care? This seems to do everything I want (I'm still reading, not positive yet) and it seems to play nice with my Mac!

Why shouldn't I just get one of these?

EDIT: Ok, it still looks good, but I'm not clear why I would buy one of these over a Drobo. It's cheaper and I guess it does less...? But I'm not seeing any reason I'd need this HP machine over that.

Still, looks good overall. I guess it's just overkill for me.

All a drobo is a storage device. You cannot run any programs off of it. It doesn't have an OS associated to it.

If all you are looking for is just storage then yes a drobo would work for you. But if you want another computer that you can run programs on and have the ability to have a good amount of storage this might be something you might want to look into.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.