Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are you someone on the development team for Android ? If not, then that is only your subjective opinion. The plethora of evidence to the contrary is quite against you though, with all the handsets that do not have that form factor at all.

And since when did it become the "iPhone" form factor ?

Circa 2002 :
image_56834_superimage.jpg



no7700_00.jpg



nokia-n800-1.jpg

TBH, those really aren't that great of examples of what would be a form factor by definition. They are great examples of the concept of a minimalistic phone (regarding available buttons) with a large touchscreen. That said, I do agree with the overall point you are discussing, and think the best, and most obvious example of a device in that form factor, would be that of the Prada, and possibly your first example the Sony.

In overall fairness, a similar question you had asked DeathChill could be asked regarding the concept and design of either the Prada, or iPhone;

Was someone at LG aware of the pending release of the iphone, and used the larger flexibility of their company to come to market with a device first? Rumors of an Apple phone came long before it's initial debut, and it is entirely possible that they contacted LG to discuss screen manufacturing for such a device.

The Flipside is entirely possible too; While visiting LG to discuss screens for the iPhone (or other products), did an Apple exec see a drawing, or possibly a prototype of the Prada phone, and decided to move their secret phone project in that route?

Which one is the chicken, or the egg? I doubt we will ever know. But as has been stated here, the form factor was definitely an eventuality.

One piece of interesting kit from history, the IBM Simon. It doesn't fit the form factor, however the concept of a primarily Touchscreen only phone came to light back in 1992. A time when cell phones were hardly in everybody's pocket.

450px-IBM_SImon_in_charging_station.png
 
First...I thought we were done?

Second, iPhone combined all the trends and created a revolutionary device. Thanks.



Logical progression of an argument. Try to keep up. You claim it would have happened anyway. Logic would dictate that that meant someone was working on something that would have helped it "happen anyway". Makes sense?



First, thanks for discounting my examples...again. Where you live doesn't somehow make what I suggested irrelevant. Second, it wasn't the first phone with capacitive screens either. And Apple didn't invent multi-touch either. As I mentioned, it was the first to combine all these things to create a revolutionary product. No other company did that, and no other company was working on a product that did. Simple as that (or maybe not, since you seem to be having a hard time with this :rolleyes: )

We are done, as far as you dont push things forward. That said, i reserve the right to correct your continuous misrepresentations.

p.s. As highlighted, many actors indeed were.
 
Last edited:
divinox said:
voonyx said:
No phone was being developed that incorporated the technologies that Apple did at the time. Simple point, and hasn't been disproved.

Something i have yet to claim. So, who are you arguing with - really? Surely cannot be me.

divinox said:
voonyx said:
Logic would dictate that that meant someone was working on something that would have helped it "happen anyway". Makes sense?

As highlighted, many actors indeed were.

huh? Either they were or they weren't. Either you claimed they were or you didn't. Which one is it?
 
Hint: Read. Think. Think some more. When you think you got it, repeat.

Nice deflection, buddy. What happened, no wikipedia articles to bolster your claims?

On a related note, as a "researcher" I find it hilarious that when you do provide links to anything (a rare occurrence) it's usually wikipedia...hilarious
 
Nice deflection, buddy. What happened, no wikipedia articles to bolster your claims?

On a related note, as a "researcher" I find it hilarious that when you do provide links to anything (a rare occurrence) it's usually wikipedia...hilarious

Hint: Read. Think. Think some more. When you think you got it, repeat.

Now give it a rest, before the mods. intervene. Thank you.
 
Don't get me wrong, it was a nice phone and it was an overall nice packaging of stuff, but that stuff wasn't new in the industry at all.

Actually, it was a famously bad phone - just Bing! for "Iphone dropped calls".

It was a nice internet terminal (at Edge speeds, of course).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.