Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would rather pay Apple for commercial free shows. Hulu leaves a bad taste in my mouth...

Netflix is a deal.. I love netflix.
 
I would rather pay Apple for commercial free shows. Hulu leaves a bad taste in my mouth...

Netflix is a deal.. I love netflix.

Those sentiments reflect mine. I wish Apple had a subscription service and I hope for a future where Hulu fails and its content deals get snapped up by Netflix. Unless something changes drastically next year, I think Netflix is in the driver's seat to become the de-facto streaming service. The only thing that could change that is if someone lands a deal to distribute local news and live sports as part of their one-price subscription. If Netflix had current TV episodes from all the major network and cable (premium and basic) channels as well as local news and live sports, I'd pay $100 for it per month without batting an eye.
 
It's such an obvious and short-sighted money grab. Really a stupid decision on Hulu's part. Hulu should be in total land-grab mode, not money grab mode. Hulu was one of the first systems to offer this type of broad, legal streaming tv service, and it's been a hit so far. But right now they should be pouring resources into making it a service that gets as widely adopted as possible and fully integrated into people's lives. Later, after hulu has attained major dominance in the industry (which will grow much larger each quarter), only THEN should they start trying to make significant money from it, because by that time they'll have economies of scale bringing their costs down, and they'll have massive industry weight allowing them to get shows for cheap which would also bring their costs down again. At that point they'll have an enormous user base and low per-user costs, so at that point they could make money easily by simply ad revenue alone or possibly charging a premium fee of a couple of dollars per month. But that should come LATER. Right now Hulu should be focusing on getting onto as many screens as possible. Their current strategy is gonna relegate them to Yahoo status - an early front runner who could've dominated the whole industry who instead made poor choices that relegated them to a tiny niche.

Hulu is owned by the TV networks, it's not some kids starting a business after smoking a bong. and they are serving a niche
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

I will sign up for Hulu Plus when it's added to the new Apple TV. I'm not paying $8 a month to watch TV on a computer screen.
 
This argument keeps coming up and its just totally non-sensicle to me. How can someone be willing to pay $60-100 a month for cable TV, which has FAR more ads than Hulu Plus, and then complain that $8 a month is too much? Am I missing something here? The total ad time in Hulu is probably 1/4 as much as the same program via cable or OTA, and the cost you are paying for the content is at least 10x.

A combination of OTA, Hulu Plus, and Netflix makes a pretty inexpensive and compelling case to cut the cable cord.

the $100 a month cable bill also includes internet and unlimited nationwide phone service.

if i were to cut cable i would still pay $40 or so for broadband internet, $20 a month for netflix and Hulu and another $30 a month for a better cell phone plan with unlimited calling.

same amount of money except i get a lot more content with cable. and for those of us with kids the cartoon selection on netflix and hulu is pretty bad

i'd probably dump cable if i was single since i don't watch a lot of TV, but with 2 kids and a wife who likes all the pop shows like Friends, AI and the dancing shows i have to have it
 
Is the Hulu Plus player any different from the regular Hulu player? Because it sucks. That is almost a bigger issue to me than the ads at this point. Again, when compared to Netflix, the Hulu player just doesn't match up. Missing good features, includes dumb features, won't stay full screen, etc.
 
Hulu International PLEASE!

If I could use hulu while on international travel, I would surely pay for it.
I wish this were true too because I current live in Japan. I couldn't care less about waiting for Hulu to give me "international content." The entire reason to have Hulu is so I can watch what I otherwise could not outside the USA!

Which leads me to wonder, is there anything like Hotspot Shield for the iPad? Even so, when I've used Hotspot shield in the past to get around Hulu's international blockade, the speed was very, very slow at times. It became so bad I stopped using it a number of months ago.
 
Ok, today I send a payment to Verizon FiOS of 222.00 that includes all the premium channels and cable ... Also Internet.

If I decide to have just the basic and pay hulu and netflix, it will be better and more logical than the deal I got now?
 
Paying Hulu? No. Paying someone else for the ability to get online? Yes. How does that support Hulu again?

Doesn't, but there are only so many hands that can get greased while seeking online entertainment.

And if you think the advertising model that Hulu has now is profitable, it isn't. Just because its on the internet, doesn't automatically make things free.

Glad you are here to teach us all on whether or not Hulu is profitable. Sounds like hind part talk to me. Either way, Hulu needs to get a clue on what is attractive to this target market instead of fishing from both ends of the pole. Have ads and make it free, or have no ads and charge a fee. Pretty simple.
 
This argument keeps coming up and its just totally non-sensicle to me. How can someone be willing to pay $60-100 a month for cable TV, which has FAR more ads than Hulu Plus, and then complain that $8 a month is too much? Am I missing something here?

1. We can DVR that content and skip it.

2. That is the *old* business model, to which many if not most of us were grandfathered into by childhood and adolescence.

This is the *new* business model, and it's in its infancy. Therefore consumers have the ability, perhaps for the first time, to shape that industry in much more significant ways than with the old model. Look at it as, the old operating contract has expired, and a new one is up for negotiation by all parties. And those consumers that are willing to pay for ad-free products are simply negotiating on the new model's contract. And they're negotiating for more.
 
Last edited:
I think $4.99 is the winning price here. Still, having inline ads for a service I am paying to use, is unattractive (unless this has changed).


nope the ads are still there. I would much rather pay the original $9.99 and say 2 ads off the top and one break in the middle or even all the ads at the top. or even pay more like $14.99 and no ads at all.
 
Everything about Hulu and Hulu Plus is awesome, except the most important thing, the programming. The website is okay, even though it's still missing many seasons and episodes of most programs.

However, the iPad and iPhone apps are ridiculous. More than half of the shows I'm subscribed to are listed as 'web only' on the iPad and iPhone Hulu Plus.
 
Okay, I just tried the new version of the Hulu Plus app and it still does NOT allow TV out from the iPad. Thus, the service (unlike the Netflix app) is still limited to the small iPad screen. This makes me wonder what is going to happen with AirPlay, I'd guess that it will be blocked (or non-functional) on Hulu Plus.

As for the price reduction, that's nice but I won't pay $8/month for the random and very seldom opportunity to watch TV while mobile, it has to be offered on my big-screen TV -- which thankfully it is on the Sony PS3, so I'm keeping my Hulu subscription for that reason alone).

Given the ability to watch Hulu Plus on a regular TV I'd say that the new price is a relative bargain if you're not already subscribing to cable or satellite TV. Right now I have no cable nor satellite nor even over-the-air TV so Hulu Plus and Netflix combined give me just about as much TV and movie watching as I need. Combine this with news and information over the internet (browser and podcasts) and I'm pretty much set for less than $55 per month (which includes my internet service).
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

I will sign up for Hulu Plus when it's added to the new Apple TV. I'm not paying $8 a month to watch TV on a computer screen.

I'm not sure you know what the difference between hulu and hulu+ is. You don't pay for watching hulu while on a computer. You only have to use hulu + for 'mobile' devices.

Also I'm sure everybody's overblowing the whole ads situation. I hate Ads as much as the next guy but I realize it's important for all businesses and is a key part of growth. I'll deal with a few ads if it helps businesses and helps keep our capitalist economy growing.
 
I'm not sure you know what the difference between hulu and hulu+ is. You don't pay for watching hulu while on a computer. You only have to use hulu + for 'mobile' devices.

Also I'm sure everybody's overblowing the whole ads situation. I hate Ads as much as the next guy but I realize it's important for all businesses and is a key part of growth. I'll deal with a few ads if it helps businesses and helps keep our capitalist economy growing.

Honestly I don't think these kids realize that those ads pay for the multi million dollar shows they are watching. They just want something for nothing yet again. What if the ads were for the iPad iPhone and MacBook air that apple air now? Would you all be complaining about them then?
 
I think Netflix has it pretty good. Commercial-free content though less content than its DVD-based service.

But diddly squat for current TV. Not a replacement for cable. With HULUPlus, one could argue that it is a fairly decent replacement for cableTV. New shows, when you want them. Don't you think NetFlix would do this if they were allowed? Both are going after different markets.

Sure, all the shows are on various websites for free but it's not as easy as HULU plus built into your TV or Blu-Ray player (or maybe AppleTV?).

At some point, I can see real computers declining and LCD TVs coming with blue tooth keyboards for all the web apps. I currently have a Vizio with web apps and the remote has a slide out keyboard for facebook and twitter. Built into the TV is also Amazon, Netflix, eBay, Vudu, Pandora, etc. It may have basic email, I don't know. But for the casual user, it almost replaces a computer. If it had a decent real keyboard.
 
Glad you are here to teach us all on whether or not Hulu is profitable. Sounds like hind part talk to me. Either way, Hulu needs to get a clue on what is attractive to this target market instead of fishing from both ends of the pole. Have ads and make it free, or have no ads and charge a fee. Pretty simple.

If it were that simple Netflix would stream new shows too without ads. They don't. They charge AND they don't have current shows. Nobody seems to be complaining about that.
 
I'm not sure you know what the difference between hulu and hulu+ is. You don't pay for watching hulu while on a computer. You only have to use hulu + for 'mobile' devices.

Also I'm sure everybody's overblowing the whole ads situation. I hate Ads as much as the next guy but I realize it's important for all businesses and is a key part of growth. I'll deal with a few ads if it helps businesses and helps keep our capitalist economy growing.

HULU plus is also what you are starting to see on Blu-Ray and TVs.
 
Who needs TiVo?

You know, this HULU plus might be a good replacement for my TiVo. GASP! But seriously, at any moment I'd have more choices that I could ever keep on my TiVo. And it would go everywhere with me. Phone, TV, Computer. I pay TiVo 12.95 a freakin' month just for access to TV guide info to program it. I mean, REALLY. REALLY TiVo? And I had to buy a $400 TiVoHD which is falling apart a year later. REALLY!

Ok, so I won't be able to pause live TV and all that jazz, but still it has me thinking.
 
I'm not sure you know what the difference between hulu and hulu+ is. You don't pay for watching hulu while on a computer. You only have to use hulu + for 'mobile' devices...
Hulu Plus is also available on TVs (i.e. not just mobile) -- note the Hulu Plus service for the Sony PS3 and the Roku box (and more are coming). I have only one Hulu Plus subscription and it works both on my iPad and on the PS3.

As for the commercials, their mere existence doesn't bother me much because they are few and quite short. However, what does bother me is that the commercials are often inserted at very awkward moments -- sometimes right in the middle of dialog. What they need to do is overlay the Hulu-specific commercial breaks into the same points used in the original TV broadcasts (unless someone does a fast forward in the playback -- then insert one if the "standard" commercial break has been skipped). Right now the commercials are generally only 30 seconds per break but I would be okay with longer breaks if that would mean better continuity in the playback (but keeping the fewer overall commercials in comparison to broadcast TV).
 
...I pay TiVo 12.95 a freakin' month just for access to TV guide info to program it. I mean, REALLY. REALLY TiVo? And I had to buy a $400 TiVoHD which is falling apart a year later. REALLY!...
The monthly $12.95 service charge for TiVo is an abomination for sure. Worse yet, they won't allow me to sign-up for a month-to-month plan, I have to commit for an entire year simply because at one point I stopped my TiVo service after I got my first cable-TV DVR (after I had been a "good" TiVo customer for several years). Then, on top of that they appear to purposely make it difficult to use the DVR functionality in a manual mode simply because you are no longer subscribing to their TV guide service. Contrast the TiVo customer service with Netflix, as Netflix not only allows month-to-month service but they even allow you to stop (or pause) the service if you know that you won't be using it for several days (like when you go on vacation). In any case, I think DVRs are a dead-end business model. In a few more years it will be on-demand streaming for just about everything.
 
Oh sweet!

Though I checked, but maybe I'm missing where it is on Netflix, but was looking for last night's Glee...my daughter really loves that program. Also, can't find the recent episodes of Modern Family and Cougar Town, nor last Saturday's SNL. That has to be on Netflix somewhere, right? I mean, since everyone is comparing Netflix and Hulu, they have to have the same content.

I mean, it couldn't be that each service has content the other doesn't have...that's just silly.
You don't need Hulu to watch those shows, you can also go to the network's websites and watch there. You will also watch with ads. Netflix offers shows without any ads so they will not show the most recent episodes, but the content they have available for streaming is so vast!

Is the Hulu Plus player any different from the regular Hulu player? Because it sucks. That is almost a bigger issue to me than the ads at this point. Again, when compared to Netflix, the Hulu player just doesn't match up. Missing good features, includes dumb features, won't stay full screen, etc.
Agreed, I watch Hulu (free version) on my MBP because it is convenient, the shows are in one place vs. going to each network's site, but their player is getting worse and worse, in addition to the issues with full screen, sometimes I get audio, sometimes not, the video hangs, the browser crashes, the list goes on and on. It is quite crazy when stupid Sliverlight is the better of the two players. It only hung briefly last week and Netflix gave us all a credit to compensate for the tech problems. Netflix's library gets better and better and movies and TV eps are getting into the streaming server faster and faster. I totally missed "Roswell" when it was on TV and am enjoying catching up with that show. And I can watch shows on my iPod Touch as well, it will remember my place in a show whether I watch part of it on the computer and then switch to watching on the iPod, it saves my place, that is pretty cool.

But, for the most current shows right now free Hulu is the easiest, but their dang player may cause me to just take the extra time to go to the various sites.

My hubby insists on satellite for sports, I do watch it because certain shows are not found anywhere on the internet including sites like Megavideo. Mostly shows on Food Network like Iron Chef, or Chopped. And on Bravo Top Chef is hard to find sometimes. But there is so much junk on the satellite now, tons of filler so it looks like they have more and more channels. However, satellite is so much better priced than Comcast, we were paying over $70 and that was not including internet (use ATT for that) Satellite is considerably less than that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.