Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
DOA or possible Dead Before Arrival.

I dont see myself buying this even 100$ let alone 700$
Dead Before Arrival is most accurate. This sounds so much like Circlet or any other number of out and out scam crowdfunded devices. I’d file this in the “it doesn’t exist until you can actually buy it” camp.
 
I have no idea if their voice commands are processed locally but if not, downloadable maps might not even be possible.
Would be a non-starter for sure ESPECIALLY if I cannot have it speak those directions to me via bluetooth headphones because it might be really difficult to hear any spoken directions over the already cacophonous ambient noise where I live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Pass. Using my hand as a display -- nah. I like the idea of a wearable AI assistant, but maybe something a bit better, like, say, a watch or bracelet type thing. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Mark Rober always says you are given a lot of latitude when working on special projects.
In other words, it’s a bit like 20% time at Google, only Google tends to throw stuff at the wall and release a lot of half baked (or even quarter or eighth baked) 20% time projects at the wall to see if they stick (this was especially true in the late 2000s and early 2010s). Apple is more than willing to axe projects that are quite far along if brass decides that the project doesn’t make sense. (Project Titan seems to have fallen under that umbrella.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve09090
Is this some joke? I wouldn't buy that, looks like some minimalistic overheating prone stuff Jon Ive would've designed.
 
In other words, it’s a bit like 20% time at Google, only Google tends to throw stuff at the wall and release a lot of half baked (or even quarter or eighth baked) 20% time projects at the wall to see if they stick (this was especially true in the late 2000s and early 2010s). Apple is more than willing to axe projects that are quite far along if brass decides that the project doesn’t make sense. (Project Titan seems to have fallen under that umbrella.)
Yeah I think so. See how far a project can go before it makes no sense to continue. Allows for lateral thinking. Something Steve Jobs focussed on, and Tim Cook has continued. Let creatives drive the direction of Apple. It doesn’t always pay off, but when it does…. But they do need (financial) restraints. Otherwise you get…. "An AI Pin with a Laser Ink Display"
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
No.
Apple doesn't find tech and then market it, they start from the user experience and figure out what tech they need to make that happen.
This thing is a pile of features with no clear reason to exist. Nothing about it says "Yea, that's better than anything else and is going to move the needle".
This is a ham-fisted attempt at making the Star Trek communicator badge a reality, except it's too big, too expensive, and locked to a company's infrastructure that seems unlikely to last very long.

There's absolutely zero about the device that's "AI". It's a thin client, an audio/video IO device. This reminds me of when Sun trying to market "The network is the computer".
Don’t forget. The Apple Watch launched with no clear direction. It took a few cycles to narrow the focus.
 
This should be a $79 iPhone add on. No addition subscription, no voice plan, etc.

Just a piece of hardware that allows you to work better with your iPhone.
Nah. It should, at the very most, be a subscription for an app. It’s a clunky device doing the job of a basic app.
 
Other than the AI stuff, what can this do that my Apple Watch can't? With Apple rumored to be adding more AI features to its devices next year, I could see this product dead in the water once an iPhone and Watch can do this stuff. Especially with that expensive price. I see the potential value, but the people in that showcase video just seemed to hate the product. By the end of the video, I just saw this as another Pebble Smartwatch. It'll sell for a year or two before something comes along and just kills it.

I already get anxiety talking to people with my phone in public, let alone through my watch. I can't imagine what people will think about me if they see me talking to my hand.

Several years ago I worked at a mental health facility. It was impossible to distinguish between the clients talking to the voices in their heads and the staff talking to the voices in their BT earphones.

The director did get a nice laugh from my comment, “Working here gives a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘committed employees’,”.
 
this looks so bad and I feel so sorry for anyone who invested in this company and anyone who placed a preorder. lol

that projector on hand feature is a classic example of gimmick ideas.

what happens if they get on a crowded train and someone just snatches it

why would I want someone to listen to my phone calls

if I'm underground and there's no internet, how will this product be useful to me in getting directions or doing practically anything else other than taking video or listening to music.

I don't think they thought this product through.
Then don’t buy it. Your problem is solved. You’re welcome.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: icanhazmac
Is this thing just on speakerphone 24/7 everywhere you go? Sounds obnoxious as hell
The last thing the world needs is yet more noise from people on their devices.

Morons who insist on using their phones on speaker at all times are bad enough, but this thing takes that even further.

Public transport is turning into a place where half the people are wearing noise cancelling headphones to block out the racket made by the other people who think everyone around them wants to hear a blast of TikTok every few seconds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Several years ago I worked at a mental health facility. It was impossible to distinguish between the clients talking to the voices in their heads and the staff talking to the voices in their BT earphones.
I remember legitimately thinking my boss was talking to himself one time when he was outside using them!
 
I wonder if they considered or cared about accessibility.

Can you activate this with voice? Rather difficult to project ink or touch to prompt if you are an amputee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sunapple
The average American spends over 7 hours a day looking at screens, and this includes more than just smartphones. Many people (like myself) would love to see a world where technology works for us, rather than for companies that develop apps designed to make a profit from us. What excites me the most about this vision is not the hardware; it's the idea of a future where I can spend more time doing things that make me happy, and where a phone doesn't stand between me and the world I'm trying to live in.
While I agree people being glued to screens is concerning, I don’t see how this product (nor probably any product) is a realistic solution. I talked about this in one of my earlier posts in this thread, but people who want a screen are going to continue buying screen devices. You can’t force them to buy the AI Pin, or something like the Lightphone (a limited function e-ink smartphone). So then who will buy these products that intentionally limit people’s screen Usage? People who already decided that they don’t want to be glued to screens. So the product isn’t solving the issue, it’s mainly just giving a different option for people for whom the issue probably wasn’t actually an issue.

The only way a product like the AI Pin might be a solution is if it was so good that people who were glued to screens were convinced that it gave them everything that a screen gave them plus more (it has to be better than their current device to replace it). But two issues with that—1) I believe AI technology is very far off to being close to replacing the need for screens, and may not be able to completely replace the need for screens ever. And 2) it may just replace one issue with another. Instead of constantly looking at and typing on their screen barely listening to the world, people may be constantly listening to and talking with AI barely looking at (and registering) the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Re: the personal speaker, I have a sneaking suspicion that “bubble of sound” means “annoy the people next to you on the subway with crappy audio coming from whatever crappy speaker they could fit into it”.
My suspicion as well.
I don’t really see the advantage of this over a smartwatch. The latter has a proper display, stock Bluetooth, and a scrolling interface that’s actually intuitive. The hand scrolling business seems super counterintuitive.
I see some advantages vs a smartwatch but not sure how valuable they will turn out to be.
The hands free camera is obviously useful, but you can’t see what’s in your frame or do any kind of zooming etc (but if good enough the AI could mitigate some of that), and there is the social problem of constantly pointing a camera at people.
Hands/eyes free interaction without wearing an earpiece is good, but again not sure how well it can isolate decent sound for the user, and most or a lot of the input is vocal which has social and privacy implications.
And I guess some people don’t like wearing watches.

But even granting assumptions, I don’t think these are advantageous enough for most people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Concerning the complaints about the speaker system: it's compatible with Bluetooth earphones. Concerning the perpetually powered battery: it has a small internal battery to support the device between main battery swaps.

No, I'm not a shill, just clarifying some things which many here were whining about without doing a whit of research. Also, I'm not an early adopter, so won't be buying this device early enough ahead of the company's shuttering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.