What’s with the tepid uptake, though? Since they're straight full PC's and not a Windows-S type device locked to an "App store" so you can run all regular full PC applications on them period. They're also not beholden to Apple's I/O port restrictions or limitations on what those ports can do. They should be immediately usable and require no 'uptake' or market penetration. I guess what I'm saying is: What's stopping these unstoppable devices? Ok, yea I'm sort of playing it up here - but not really - You just now and the person who I originally quoted (and who replied below) feel such things will be amazing and would necessarily then replace iPad sales. Or kneecap the sales to a niche market of consumers.
Instead, it's been 5-6 years for the "PC in tablet form" market and the best you can say is that it is "slowly getting there"? Apple's iPad, with all that baggage in tow and the limitations it has, was an overnight success. So again, why the tepid uptake. To me instead, I read that as "PC tablets" aren't the amazing things they're claimed to be.
I just beg to differ - if they were amazing as claimed - shouldn't they have taken off already? We already have them.