but the screen is so small that you turn page too often, it's very annoying. Not enough datas on screen due to size and/or screen ratio (title, page number, and at best a paragraph in the middle in iBooks). These are too small devices for a good e-books reading experience, Apple needs something else.I do find that the iPhone / iPod touch is perfect for one-handed reading.
People advocating for a 7.85" mini iPad and comparing its size to other tablets always forget about the screen ratio
Apple needs something else than a shrinked and cheaper iPad
Anybody has info if Apple and Qualcomm or LG are working on these promising screens for the hypothetical new iOS-device?
The already different form factor and screen ratio (well i actually do not really like the look of this 16:9 mockup attempt, too tall, i was just trying to match other iOS devices' screens' size, and at a 326 ppi density. A smaller one for example at 1536x1024 would look better and would be 5.66" at 326ppi or 6.4" at 288ppi) already imply to lose every existing 3rd party apps.What you're advocating is basically a larger iPod Touch, literally. Either that, or you're proposing Apple adds a third development size to the ecosystem. It's an interesting idea but I doubt Apple will do that. I see that you're also suggesting to make this device without any 3rd party developer support but that's... just too far fetched and wouldn't work all too well since it means giving up on all the existing ecosystem other than iTunes/iBooks stuff
yep and I think we can debate nights and days if it will be usable with iPad apps built with a 10" in mind, before to see it in real use if they really launch a 7.85" iPadThe 7.85" iPad Mini idea sounds reasonable because it at least matches the old iPhone's UI size. If you're fine with using iPhone's touch UI, then the new iPad Mini should at least be fairly usable.
okNo, the rumor is that it's just a regular LCD. But the persistent rumor says that Apple is requesting LG to do everything possible in order to minimize the size of the bezel.
The iPad 2 is now 399 so it's going to need to be around 249-299 to compete with the Fire.
The iPad 2 is now 399 so it's going to need to be around 249-299 to compete with the Fire.
The iPad 2 is now 399 so it's going to need to be around 249-299 to compete with the Fire.
The Fire is going to need to be more powerful to compete with the iPad. But I agree that a smaller iPad only needs to get in touching distance of the Fire price to steal siginificant sales from it.
If I recall e-ink refresh rates are much slower than even the original iPad. IF Apple releases a smaller iPad bet your bottom dollar Apple will have designed it so that apps have the same feel as on either the iPhone, iPod touch, or the larger iPad.
If amazon are clever enough though (and they are) they ll come up with a larger fire too though, price the original fire even lower, and they can easily cut a larger % off the ipad's market. Watch this space.
Aren't they already selling the Fire at a loss, hoping to make the money back selling content for it?