What "evidence" is needed for "claims" in a column that the writer himself dismisses as piffle?
I still don't understand if he was actually trying to be funny... I know nothing of this writer so I have no clue what he normally writes about. The only thing I can think of is he tried to falsely classify Mac users the same way Apple has done with the Mac + PC ads... Maybe I'm a bit literal as I find that immature and pointless, especially the attacks at Mac users themselves. I mean the Mac + PC ads must of offended the poor guy so much to write that article, all I can think of is that this guy must of had a traumatic experience with a Mac when he was younger. Overall I found this worse than reading a Jeremy Clarkson article.*
*Jeremy Clarkson is awesome