Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

penfan82

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 11, 2011
155
1
and would be sad if apple finally did discontinue it at this sept ipod update. I have a first generation classic and I still use it everyday unlike my touch or my droid x as music devices. I've always loved how it can hold almost my entire library rather than pick and choose like i have too with the other two devices... anyone else still in love with the classic?
 
I agree.
The classic for me is much more convient at the gym than my touch or other iPods mainly because of the large storage. I hope that they don't discontinue them.
 
I got mine on eBay for $30 - it looks like it was run over by a truck but it works perfectly :D Use it all day!
 

Attachments

  • Q3DX.iPhone image 2011-03-18 10.19.53.jpg
    Q3DX.iPhone image 2011-03-18 10.19.53.jpg
    365.3 KB · Views: 130
My 4th gen white "classic" is still going strong too. I hope they never do away with the design-- it's so iconic.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

penfan82 said:
and would be sad if apple finally did discontinue it at this sept ipod update. I have a first generation classic and I still use it everyday unlike my touch or my droid x as music devices. I've always loved how it can hold almost my entire library rather than pick and choose like i have too with the other two devices... anyone else still in love with the classic?

You have a everyday use first gen iPod classic!!! Wow, surprise it still works since it is almost 10 yrs old. Would have throughout batteries or HD would fail with everyday use.

But you have less then 5gigs of music? Most ppl complain that the 64gigs is to small and that's why they need a 160 GB classic
 
Music fanatics seem to love the classic above all other iPods and there seems to be a cult following of the device.

It has always been my favorite iPod, I just wish apple would act like it exists and give it a few updates...like a slightly larger screen (3"), radio, etc.

I don't think that would kill the "Classic" name by throwing in a few updates it still has the click wheel and that alone would fit the classic name now that there is no other iPod holding the click wheel.

I'm just hoping for a secret 220GB update or a 220GB update this year with the iPod updates in Sept/Oct.

Its interesting to see that amazon no longer stocks the classics and it is still in the top 30 @ $300 for a new one.

I think apple SEVERELY underplays the selling of the classic, the fact is the iPod touch brings in more revenue for them (app store) so of course they are going to try to get people off the classic. I've always seen it in the Top 10 ABOVE the nano and shuffle on Amazon when they were stocking them.

I have a brand new 160GB that is sitting in its case when my 120GB dies on me..which has taken a beating (dent in the side of it, been dropped on concrete at least 3 or 4 times at work) and is still ticking.

Also have a 5.5G 240GB (swapped hard drives) that is used strictly to display videos on my TV.
 
Anyone know the sales figures for the classic itself, as i can only find for the touch or the classic bundled in with all the other players (nano, touch etc..)
 
My 4th gen white "classic" is still going strong too. I hope they never do away with the design-- it's so iconic.

Mine is too :D

Although the only problem I've had with it is when I hook it up to my car's Harman/Kardon... when I disconnect it, it stays in the "Okay to Disconnect" screen and I have to reboot the iPod. :-/
 
Just got mine a couple of week sago and I'm loving it. My 60gb iPod Photo had to go (as it weren't werkin' right) and I'm a happy boy.
 
I think Apple would disappoint a lot of music lovers and more 'serious' listeners if they discontinued the Classic. There is no other iPod/iPhone with that kind of storage capacity.
 
It'd be sad to see it go, but I think it's going to.

If Apple sell are selling a laptop with only 64GB of memory in 2011, I don't think they're worried about massess of people needing 160GB+ in the future, especially if a 128GB iPod touch may well be released this september

Also, Apple are starting to hate selling products with moving parts, look at every iPod (-classic) and the new MacBook Airs...the classic can't go on forever, as Iconic as it is.

Get one now, they'll be worth a lot on eBay in the future!

I'll miss it!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)



You have a everyday use first gen iPod classic!!! Wow, surprise it still works since it is almost 10 yrs old. Would have throughout batteries or HD would fail with everyday use.

But you have less then 5gigs of music? Most ppl complain that the 64gigs is to small and that's why they need a 160 GB classic

I put most of my collection on ipod but I have much more than what's on there
 
How about a Classic that's a little smaller, a little thinner, with a screen that goes mostly edge to edge (so larger) and the hard drive replaced with maybe 4 flash chips so they can give it 128GB without such a high cost. Flash storage would use much less power than the hard drive too, so the battery could get smaller while even delivering better battery life.
 
I got mine on eBay for $30 - it looks like it was run over by a truck but it works perfectly :D Use it all day!

.... you make me want to pick up an iPod classic (used or new).

UGH why did I just pick up an ipod touch?!?! :eek::D:eek:
 
There's an article in today's NY Times titled, "Gadgets You Should Get Rid Of (or Not)." It says (emphasis added):
DIGITAL MUSIC PLAYER Lose it (probably). Do you have a smartphone? Then you have a music player. Why load yourself down with an extra gadget? Apple popularized the music player with its iPod, but when was the last time you saw that iconic white box with the dial on the front? Music is data, and many multifunction devices can handle it along with many other kinds of data (like video, e-mail and apps). The one exception may be if you enjoy music while exercising. In that case, a tiny player like the $49 iPod Shuffle might be a better accessory than a larger, heavier smartphone.
 
There's an article in today's NY Times titled, "Gadgets You Should Get Rid Of (or Not)." It says (emphasis added):
DIGITAL MUSIC PLAYER Lose it (probably). Do you have a smartphone? Then you have a music player. Why load yourself down with an extra gadget? Apple popularized the music player with its iPod, but when was the last time you saw that iconic white box with the dial on the front? Music is data, and many multifunction devices can handle it along with many other kinds of data (like video, e-mail and apps). The one exception may be if you enjoy music while exercising. In that case, a tiny player like the $49 iPod Shuffle might be a better accessory than a larger, heavier smartphone.

If I already have all of those products that they are telling me to lose (iPod, GPS, etc) why should I "lose" it? This article is pretty useless.
 
If I already have all of those products that they are telling me to lose (iPod, GPS, etc) why should I "lose" it? This article is pretty useless.

I LOVE my smartphone.... sorry peeps i am an android owner and i did try it as a mp3 player and still use as one in a pinch however i did find myself going back to my trusty classic it holds everything whereas smart phone cannot... no matter what they say i wont lose my ipod
 
I LOVE my smartphone.... sorry peeps i am an android owner and i did try it as a mp3 player and still use as one in a pinch however i did find myself going back to my trusty classic it holds everything whereas smart phone cannot... no matter what they say i wont lose my ipod

I don't use that much space, but a Classic is just so nice in general. Haha.
Come on Apple, 64GB iPhone!!!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.