paj
macrumors regular
I really didn't want to play the childish game of addressing each and every word literally, but you seem to be unable (or maybe unwilling) to understand context and implied meaning.
Here was you original statement:
Now I am really beginning to question whether you read your own post, let alone mine. I am fully aware the iPhone is not for everyone. That was the whole premise of my original post. It's also the reason I use both devices.
Let's recap... You entered this thread in direct response to a post by yoomy, where he was asking people to accept the fact that some people may need instant email. In your response, you made the following statement:
"People seem to think that the iPhone was intended to replace every other smartphone out there. They are sorely mistaken. That goal has never been stated."
You then finished up with the following statement:
"For obsessive control freaks who want to appear constantly busy while not actually doing very much, there's the Blackberry."
I then responded by giving you a possible reason why people might have that expectation. I also re-iterated the fact that people have different needs and I expressed my amusement regarding the way fanboys blindly support or defend Apple depending on whether a feature is, or is not included in the iPhone.
No problems so far…
Unfortunately, your next post started badly by mis-quoting me and went on to contain narrow minded and over-simplistic statements that categorize a typical fanboy type of post. So I responded in kind and corrected you erroneous assumptions regarding my device needs, usage and acceptance of other peoples requirements.

I twisted no words around. I simply used yours, and those words were viery clear and direct. You claimed that Apple and "fanboys" have "touted the iPhone as a Blackberry Killer." I asked you to show us.
And I'm not the one making the claim, so I will not do your homework for you. The burden of proof is on you. Surely you have something to back up your own arguments, or you wouldn't have made them, right?
Here was you original statement:
If you re-read my post, you will clearly see that I meant no mention of any Apple advertisement making that quote, but you chose to twist the words of my post in an attempt to support your argument (I use the word argument loosely). As for the fanboys touting the iPhone as a 'blackberry killer', then you don't have to look far to find posts implying exactly that. In fact, you'll find plenty by using those exact words literally. You can try it in Google too if you like.Please show me an Apple advertisement where the iPhone was described as a "Blackberry killer." Just one.
Pot, kettle, black I suppose. Quite ironic that you can't even see your intolerance to a very simple, pragmatic approach. The iPhone isn't for everyone. WHY is that so hard to accept? The only people who would blindly support your position that the iPhone SHOULD fit everyone's needs is... well, an Apple fanboy. And I just don't accept that position.
Now I am really beginning to question whether you read your own post, let alone mine. I am fully aware the iPhone is not for everyone. That was the whole premise of my original post. It's also the reason I use both devices.
Let's recap... You entered this thread in direct response to a post by yoomy, where he was asking people to accept the fact that some people may need instant email. In your response, you made the following statement:
"People seem to think that the iPhone was intended to replace every other smartphone out there. They are sorely mistaken. That goal has never been stated."
You then finished up with the following statement:
"For obsessive control freaks who want to appear constantly busy while not actually doing very much, there's the Blackberry."
I then responded by giving you a possible reason why people might have that expectation. I also re-iterated the fact that people have different needs and I expressed my amusement regarding the way fanboys blindly support or defend Apple depending on whether a feature is, or is not included in the iPhone.
No problems so far…
Unfortunately, your next post started badly by mis-quoting me and went on to contain narrow minded and over-simplistic statements that categorize a typical fanboy type of post. So I responded in kind and corrected you erroneous assumptions regarding my device needs, usage and acceptance of other peoples requirements.
Once again you seem to be unable to read beyond the actual words and letters. My "read something else" comment was in direct response to your "buy something else" comment.I never said "read something else." Now who's twisting words around?