Forgive my ignorance but is that hot for what you were doing? sounds hot to me
What are "normal" temps for doing such things?
Forgive my ignorance but is that hot for what you were doing? sounds hot to me
What are "normal" temps for doing such things?
Your welcome. I'm just trying to help. But of course everyone will have their opinion. But I'll be exchanging mine for the i5. To bad too, because this one has no dead pixels and both the display and ssd are Samsung.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
If you worry about fan noise don't get the 1.8 i7. It's benefit is negligible. The i5 in the air has all the features normally associated with the i7 except it has 1 mb less cache.
Early i5 CPUs lacked features such as hyperthreading but sandybridge loads the i5 up.
Oh, I don't think negligible is the right word for the 11". The 13" probably, but this stuff adds up![]()
Just an update you guys. It seems like my i7 is now finally stable.
I've gone from the 11" 1.6GHZ to the 11" i7.
The i7 temp at idle is 55 C. The 1.6 ghz idle temp was around 45. The fans are quiet.
It's now a powerful machine in a small package, where previously it was an efficient machine in a small package.
your move![]()
Well, for the 11" its only a 12% clock speed bumb from 1.6 to 1.8.
-d
Nope thats flawed. Your basing the machines on usage when not being worked , Your not taking into account turbo boost. 2.3 v 2.9 = 600 MHz difference. That is a sizeable percentage improvement when you actually need it.
Damn! Just ordered the i7 MBA ultimate 2 days ago,
But now that i read all of the stories i' m getting worried.
I thought the more memory the better 3vs4 is 25% more
And it rats 17w of power same as the i5, power is also heat
If the processor runs extremly hotter that the i5 it will need much more that 17w and so the battery life is also decreased.
I find this a bit strange. When the first Sandy Bridge(2nd generation Core i3/i5/i7) reviews were out, they noted that unlike previous chips, having the CPU at max achieved better battery life since the power management was much more advanced, and faster CPU allowed it to idle faster. So if that carried onto the 17W CPUs, the i7's at least shouldn't have lower battery life compared to the i5.
Just an update you guys. It seems like my i7 is now finally stable. It's hovering around 50 Celsius with many programs running. Today I left the machine running all day without going into sleep mode. I think it just may have need to index it self out. It's cool to the touch. Only time it got pretty warm was when I imported 11gb worth of photos into Aperture. That got to about 85 Celsius and 6k rpm. Keep in mind I won't be importing that daily. So far it appears to have cooled off quite a bit. Hopefully it stays that way.![]()