aswitcher said:Yeah, how excited should we be?
yoman said:I wonder if Anything will happen. I am hoping but I know I shouldn't.
I hope.
I shouldn't
I hope
I shouldn't
I HOPE!!!!!!
![]()
jyvin said:
Well.. I thought this part pretty much confirms that Cell vill be POWER/PowerPC-based:miloblithe said:Good, but doesn't sound like the news we wanted to hear.
numediaman said:This is pretty sad. Mac users have to wait around and hope IBM saves Apple. How ironic!
Two months ago the whole marketing of Apple was in the hands of Pepsi.
I don't expect anything from today's meeting except maybe some guidance about where IBM's technology goes in the future. If Apple has a new product announcement you would think they would announce it themselves. If it is announced at an IBM event it shows that Apple no longer controls the fate of their own hardware.
wdlove said:I'm very anxious to hear if any real Apple news will be released today. I skimmed the article, but didn't see anything that seemed to apply to Apple. So I will be patient for further news. It's on to WWDC.
Henriok said:I find it fascinating that IBM (or Motorola for that matter) can host an event in witch they try to pitch the PowerPC platform without mentioning Apple anywhere. Apple and Nintendo are BY FAR the largest PowerPC customers in the world, but they are hardly ever mentioned.
Did I miss a pressrelease somewhere? What's rumored is that the Xbox 2 developer boxes run an operating system based on a modified NT kernel.. That's not even near the same as "Windows will run fine on them" in the future. Even if Microsoft makes a full fleged Windows distribution for POWER/PowerPCs (something that's extremely unlikely) every application will have to be either recompiled or emulated. Emulated IA-32 on PPC is not what emulated IA-32 is on IA-64 (Itanium), and there's not much thir party support for that platform despite that giants like Intel, HP and Microsoft have been pushing for that plaform for years.grouse said:Of course, let's not forget that in the speed race, there's nothing to stop DELL going over to IBM chips, at some point in the future, since Windows will run fine on them.
legion said:IBM doesn't have to pay any licensing to Motorola for "AltiVec." AltiVec is just a marketing name, but the SIMD unit is freely available to IBM (IBM uses the name VMX). The reason why IBM doesn't use it is because, well, it's a lousy vector unit. Having to strap the connection to a server chip (POWER series) for VMX is useless as they have the money to attach a better vector unit on chip. They put the VMX unit on the current PPC970 with much protest and at Apple's instance (mostly because of Apple marketing for the last few years about AltiVec accelerated programs) If it was left to IBM, they wouldn't have used it at all as technology-wise it's a backwards step.
welborn said:What if IBM announced high-end servers (blades, et cetera) featuring MacOS X Server?
A server platform uses fewer off-the-shelf binaries, so a quick recompile for POWER of the whole OS shouldn't be a problem. As long as all the standard Unix-based stuff still compiles, it just becomes a better, more compatible, more usable Unix variant. Right now their servers run Linux and AIX, why not MacOS X?
BenRoethig said:Good question. From what I've read, it wouldn't be too hard to get OSX to work on POWER 4/5. Exactly why wouldn't Apple want their OS on high-end servers and work stations?