Well said ....
Originally posted by blue&whiteman
when someone pays good money for something they have every right to insist it be perfect. its people like you that quality control people love because you will settle for second best.
*********************************
NG,
If Apple did not make such a point of their
superior aesthetics -- Ives et al -- and if they
were incapable of producing quality fit/finish
products, we would not have a case.
BUT, since Apple does make a HUGE point of
their superior design/fit/finish ( and rack in
millions based on that ), AND since they are
perfectly capable of delivering on that promise ( witness : iPod, iMac, G5 ) ...
THEN, we have every right to demand that the AESTHETIC ( read : "plastics" , stuck pixels, etc ) portion of their SALES PITCH be
D-E-L-I-V-E-R-E-D ....
I have never paid Apple with defective dollars.
Had ANY portion of my payment BOUNCED,
I would have heard from their COLLECTORS.
Apple Inc. is VERY anal-retentive about this
In a sad way, you are lucky (NG) that you have no appreciation of beauty in the design of machines. You will be happy with any turd
you are given.
But many of us find that a Mac with a flaw is much worse than a winbox with a flaw ; in the same way that a figure skater who falls on her ass looks far worse than a roller derby skater who falls on her's ..... get it ?
We expect more from Apple.
In fact, we pay more for it.
---gooddog