As long as they don't get Adium...
Rival for MS ? i don't think so!
MSN is free
Hotmail is free
Windows Live apps are free incl Live gallery very similar to iPhoto
.Mac = 99 USD
iChat = ???? USD i doubt it will be free with the leopard functionality
my 2cents..... Apple should stick with mac computers and stop creating windows versions of their apps which justndont work good and do not feel right...
Get A Mac !!!!!!!
I want it not for myself but my PC friends who would never purchase a mac, granted it would probably be just as hard to get them onto ichat but if I could then I could kiss MSN goodbye once and for all!
If Apple were to do this, it'd make it even harder to switch to the Mac when you have iTunes (iPhone, iPod support), Safari, Quicktime, and iChat running cross platform.
It is only a matter of time, when Apple will port their pro apps (read: Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, etc.) and SOHO apps, like iWork to Windows. You'll see.
It is only a matter of time, when Apple will port their pro apps (read: Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, etc.) and SOHO apps, like iWork to Windows. You'll see.
Every one of those software products either helps sell things or helps develop things. iTunes sells music and iPods. Quicktime has a pro version that costs $$ and also has its own standard, which apple needs to get out there. And Safari was released for developers. iChat has none of that, especially with no more iSight. iChat runs on AOL and .mac, but .mac isn't going to be much use to a PC user unless they also have a mac.
I don't agree with your argument. QT was released for Windows in order for it to become a major competitor in the media player market. If QT was only available on a Mac, very very few internet sites would use the format and it would fall to WM, Real, and Flash. It has nothing to do with the little $20 pro version.
Same with Safari. If only Mac people use Safari, then no developers would code their websites to work with Safari. Yes, it relates to developers, but not in the way you imply. The goal is market share. Once Safari gains enough market share, then it will get the attention from developers that Apple wants. Residing on the Windows platform in addition to the Mac platform is allowing Safari to approach that market share level much faster.
Have you ever tried to video chat with someone not using iChat? It's sporadic at best. Not to mention that you can't video conference with multiple people unless they all have iChat. I think opening iChat up to Windows would do a lot to increase the market share of the program.
I agree with the standards compliance part.Rather than increase the market share of Safari itself, I think Apple's motivation was to push web standards compliant browsers in to people's homes. It is of fundamental importance to Apple that websites are coded in a standards compliant way.
It is only a matter of time, when Apple will port their pro apps (read: Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, etc.) and SOHO apps, like iWork to Windows. You'll see.
I agree with the standards compliance part.
Still, I can't see why Apple would need to port their own browser over.
FireFox is already there and promoting standards compliance (as opposed to IE-proprietary solutions), isn't it?
Ok so when I get my Mac will my PC buddies be able to see my effects (like pop art) on their chat (AIM)?