I mean, everybody would be buying a Mercedes/BMW etc if they had a choice.....Seems more like due to necessity than computing quality choices.
I mean, everybody would be buying a Mercedes/BMW etc if they had a choice.....Seems more like due to necessity than computing quality choices.
Anyone that talks down on the Chromebook likely hasn't even ever used one. They're a great cheap device that gets folks online. Anymore, there isn't much you can't do on a Chromebook you wouldn't be using a standard Mac or Windows laptop for anyways via apps...especially for school or home use. You can use Microsoft Office apps, you can manage your photos, play games, watch Netflix, and, of course, browse the internet.
Could not have said it better. Apple's greed is going to cost them a generation. Why not cut the price to schools basically to cost or less.....let those kids cut their teeth on Apple products and you'll have a generation who will have Apple's for life.As an all-Mac family of four, our two elementary school-aged children were issued Chromebooks for remote learning for the majority of 2020. Total. Pieces. Of junk. But... The remote learning that the pandemic forced is likely why we see these Chromebook numbers. Teachers and education in America are already embarrassingly underfunded/valued. What school district can supply their students/staff with iPads? Very, very few. Plus, what a Chromebook can offer is totally fine for 99.9% of students/teachers and - most importantly - the price point is THE deal breaker for school districts. Period. The end. And price is something in which Apple has never shown interest in competing. So as much as I loathe Google, I get why this specific data favors them.
For me, this touches on a larger gripe I have with Apple... There is a whole slew of youth whose first, measurable, independent computer using experience is Google-based. They are cutting their tech teeth on Google. Forming tech preferences based on "the Google way." It's no stretch to fast forward to when they are making their own tech decisions/purchases... Are they more likely to go with what they know for a better entry-level price point, or spend more on something that's new and unfamiliar? If history is any indicator, people tend to stick with what they know. There are outliers, of course.
Apple's half-assed attempts at making inroads into the education sector has been most unfortunate. In my mind, one of their biggest misses. I mean, sure - Apple's doing fine, obviously. But as an investor, as a parent of young children, I sure would like to see them make a real play at addressing the needs of these newest tech users. Todays iPad user is tomorrow's APPL investor.
Uh, don't buy a Chromebook unless it's for school or work. For personal reasons, stick with MacOS bro.Which Chromebook device do you recommend? Thinking of picking up the Lenovo Duet to try but would prefer something with a bigger display.
Not so. You can still use some apps like Google Docs offline.Unsurprising given how cheap they are to bulk-purchase.
That, plus the ease and equally well valued Google Workspace make them actually a good deal for many use cases. When you're 'in' the Google Workspace, pretty much everything an employee for an organisation/student or educator requires is there - even down to their Office variants.
But they are at the end of the day a terminal, and if the internet goes down, work grinds to a halt.
Well, I don’t wholly know if they’re perfect for education, but I’d imagine you’re right about school purchases being the reason. It’s certainly the first thing I thought of, and I’d imagine that Apple’s B2B sales (both Mac and iPad) were down last year (likely true for the whole industry).Probably school districts + parents of remote learners pushing the sales up, which is awesome imo. Chromebooks are the perfect education machines for almost every scenario besides a couple that macOS/Windows are required for. Cheap, have a microphone + speakers + webcam, easy to remote manage, very reliable too.
Yeah and I'm sure you need so much computing power to do advanced tasks like posting on Macrumors over 700 times...That’s not really a computer though. It’s an internet terminal used by stay home moms who post on FB about 5G Bill Gates Illuminati space lasers.
Do people really need sd cards, or just some "professional" photographers can't stop complaining about it? Yeah, the 2016 models sucked, but not because of lack of ports.It’s because MacBooks were being suck since 2016 and very little people would want to buy a laptop without SD card slot and USB ports which requires full load of dongles.
That is exactly where the 12" MacBook excelled. The MacBook "Air" is almost 50% heavier and a lot bigger in size.I purchased a Chromebook because I wanted something light and portable to carry around. My MBP is too heavy and too expensive so that stays on my desk. The Chromebook is ideal for checking emails in the local coffee shop.
One thing many PC users discount is the market for what I term personal productivity software/utilities (think Quicksilver, OmniFocus [and other GTD applications], outliners, clipboard managers, text shortcut expanders, etc., the market for which is surprisingly mostly non-existent on PC). Some of these do have web based versions, but much of it is macOS exclusive (even the applications that don’t strictly need to be native) and much of it needs to be native. I’ve noticed for some time that most PC software, particularly anything enterprise-y, has migrated to the cloud over the past few years. I’m assuming it’s because businesses would rather spend $200 on a basic thin-client-ish computer than $2000 on a full fledged workstation for most users.I've used Chromebooks. They will do what most people need to do very well. Also, there is almost zero learning curve. They "just work"
The user interface is MUCH better than Windows and as good as MacOS. They are based on Linux while the Mac runs a BSD UNIX kernel. About the same thing, really.
The reason to buy a Mac rather than a Chromebook is if you run any specialized apps like say Final Cut or the Adobe suite or if you must run a specific version of MS Office. But VERY few people need this. For the majority, the Chromebook is ideal, especially when you consider the price.
Apple was a "price problem" when you get to notebooks larger than 13 inches but you can buy a larger Chromebook for under $500.
The one reason why I want an SD card slot is because I can keep a MicroSD card in it with a full bootable macOS installed.Do people really need sd cards, or just some "professional" photographers can't stop complaining about it? Yeah, the 2016 models sucked, but not because of lack of ports.
I generally agree. I've owned a few chromebooks over the years and settled on a Pixelbook for the last 3 years. I'm running web, Android, Linux, and Windows apps on it. There's one app that I heavily rely on that is only available on Windows, MacOS, and iOS so it prevents me from sticking with the Pixelbook.Anyone that talks down on the Chromebook likely hasn't even ever used one. They're a great cheap device that gets folks online. Anymore, there isn't much you can't do on a Chromebook you wouldn't be using a standard Mac or Windows laptop for anyways via apps...especially for school or home use. You can use Microsoft Office apps, you can manage your photos, play games, watch Netflix, and, of course, browse the internet.
The Duet is an excellent option... especially if you get it on sale. I recently picked one up for my wife. $250 for the 128 GB model. The idea is to be able to replace her iPad and Macbook Air. (if you've been considering the Duet then you know it includes the kickstand and keyboard cover) I picked up the Lenovo USI stylus for it and it offers a user experience comparable to an Apple Pencil. (latency is quite good)Which Chromebook device do you recommend? Thinking of picking up the Lenovo Duet to try but would prefer something with a bigger display.
Well, the "problem" is that for $799 you can buy 3 or even 4 (!) Chromebooks.I think the new M1 MacBook Air at $800 (actually $799) educational stands a real chance at turning this around.
By many metrics that's not even close to half the computer that the M1 MacBook Air is, and I bet the lifespan doesn't end up being half either, making it more expensive in the long-run.