Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Create a manual and parts for the Mac Studio M3. Thats the machine I am waiting for
Throw on Thunderbolt 5 too.

Laptops are toys that break too easy and are costly to repair.
 
I own several flashlights in a dang-tough matte black anodized finish. Apple is just overhyping late and inferior versions of stuff that already exists. Again.

And no my flashlights are not covered in fingerprints either.
How did Apple overhype this in any shape or form? They basically mentioned that the new finish was a lot more fingerprint resistant once during the product launch. It's not on their website or any ads/marketing materials. It's the influencers making a big deal out of it. If anything you'd actually think Apple would talk about it a bit more given how much better it performs compared to other black finishes from Razer or the midnight color on MBA etc.
 
Last edited:
Reflecting in more directions. Instead of being reflected directly back, it is reflected into the texture.

(Yes, that line bothered me too.)
It’s called scattering light, bouncing it in many directions, it sounds like. Yeah, that statement really bothered me, too! If it were simply ‘reflecting’ light, it would be brighter, not darker in appearance.
I would think that since this ‘color’ appearance is achieved via micro-pitting/abrasion it really should be a more durable coating than typical anodized metal? Though, I guess it would still scratch off if treated roughly.
 
Other than speed improvements to the M chip, there has not been many new innovations or new features in the MacBook in the last number of years. No wonder Mac sales are down.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: PantherKang
aka, they spray-painted the chassis black and called it a day, along with the effort they tried with this release, it feels like a new car model year coming out, nothing major, the same design, a new color to attract buyers, and maybe a complete redesign like every 5 years.
Are you new to Apple? Or the Mac? This has long been their approach. Anyone who expected something more than a spec bump after just 2 years was always setting themselves up for disappointment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PantherKang
The excellent tech gadget review YouTuber, Marques Brownlee, has stated in many of his videos that his favorite color for tech products is matte black. Therefore, I'm curious to hear his opinion on the new Space Black finish on the new MacBook Pros.
He said that he loves the colour, but the spec bump isn’t enough to warrant him upgrading from his current M1 Max as there isn’t a significant change to his workflow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThomasJL
Apple created nothing black finish. They paid experts - probably working in the car sector - to find a solution. Or they just pickpocketed an existing Black color and renamed it Space Black. I don't think they have a paint lab in the Apple Space headquarters - or show it to us in your fantastic advertizing videos.
 
I wonder if Apple ever produces a movie for Apple TV based in space, that space will actually be black of just dark grey as that is apparently what Apple feel "Space Black" is.
Space, the absence of all light. "The blackness of space" as is always said.

To note: I have no issue or grumble whatsoever with this new dark grey colour, I just find it odd that as a company you choose to deliberately miss name/identify a colour.
Just come up with some cool sounding amazing name which can be associated with a dark grey item.

It's just odd to decide to think of something in the real world/universe and then name your product that when it's not like that.

I really would love to sit in at these meetings they have at Apple when deciding this stuff.
My gut feel is that, like in many companies, you have 1 STRONG manager that basically runs the show and others have given up disagreeing, and have learned that life is just easier to go along with them, and nothing fundamental is ever going to change until that person leaves the company.

Probably like Johnny Ives an all the poor regrettable designs of the past.
Even in my small workplace the same situation is in place. You have the Boss/Owner/CEO and his sidekick, and what they say goes, and everyone has learned over the years it's a waste of time trying to put any other ideas forward.
 
Apple created nothing black finish. They paid experts - probably working in the car sector - to find a solution. Or they just pickpocketed an existing Black color and renamed it Space Black. I don't think they have a paint lab in the Apple Space headquarters - or show it to us in your fantastic advertizing videos.
Paying specialist external consultants or employing experts from other industries to find solutions is standard business practice. The company footing the bill still gets to claim the solution as theirs, that's the way it works.
 
Less like reflecting… Not more
It’s sort of the opposite of LG’s Micro Lens Array technology which brightens TV’s by focusing and bouncing the same light back to the user. Ordinarily, LG’s OLED screens are very dim with the light being diffused everywhere. MLA takes that same light and gathers it. What Apple did was the exact opposite. Instead of light bouncing directly back to the user’s eye, it scatters it so the same light goes everywhere, hence less light gets to the user’s eye.

Neither affects how much light there is. They only influence where the light bounces to. MLA only appears brighter while the space black coating only appears dimmer.
 
It’s sort of the opposite of LG’s Micro Lens Array technology which brightens TV’s by focusing and bouncing the same light back to the user. Ordinarily, LG’s OLED screens are very dim with the light being diffused everywhere. MLA takes that same light and gathers it. What Apple did was the exact opposite. Instead of light bouncing directly back to the user’s eye, it scatters it so the same light goes everywhere, hence less light gets to the user’s eye.

Neither affects how much light there is. They only influence where the light bounces to. MLA only appears brighter while the space black coating only appears dimmer.
That phrase doesn’t make sense either way. It’s not more light.
 
No, Apple is anti-repair and anti-consumer, and hypocritical about their environmental pledges to boot.

“Parts theft” is just as easily solved by not allowing them to be installed in another device unless they were unlocked with an iCloud account while installed in the parent device. Just like iCloud-deactivating a device for sale.

If I can figure out a solution that easily, you can guarantee Apple knows about it and is willingly choosing to shaft consumers instead.
Anti-repair, yes. Anti-customer, I don't think so. Apple hardware is quite durable. I'd love to be able to repair and change parts but I must admit that the initial construction is sufficient and the last Mac that I upgraded was a B&W G3, long time ago.
 
He says he filled up the RAM usage in 15 minutes. This guy talks like he doesn't have a real clue how MacOS uses RAM. Yes, SSD swap is a real thing but, the SSD would still last longer than most people ever dream of. This iFixit guy doesn't sound objective to me in his presentation.
There are no excuses for Apple to put such ridiculous amounts of RAM and SSD space in “Pro” computers. Nobody should buy the 8GB model and they know it. It’s a Mercedes SUV with 12 inch wheels.
Yes, they have fast RAM and SSDs that are used in a clever way but RAM should be adequate to the CPU and never a bottleneck to upsell bigger amounts, especially when it’s not replaceable, especially when replaceable ones for a PC cost 80% less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melliflu
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.