Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s technically possible, but the required equipment and difficulty is many orders of magnitude above, say, obtaining a pentalobe screwdriver set (which seems to be some sort of repairability baseline here).

Also, given the silicon shortage, I doubt the RAM ICs will be available in the typical Shenzhen market for a couple years. A quick check of mouser for a 128Gb LPDDR5 module with a 128bit interface shows it’s $170 (and you’d need two for 32GB), so it’d be an expensive upgrade— and it’s likely a special pin-out like on the M1, which means that off the shelf parts like that probably wouldn’t work anyway.
Thanks for the information.
 
For me the major repairability issues are:

1) The HDMI and SD card ports are soldered to the logic board rather than a separate board. There is no technical reason (signal loss, efficiency, etc.) requiring these on the logic board. There's really no excuse.

2) The SSD should be replaceable. There may be power savings for a soldered module vs socketed, but SSDs have a finite lifespan and really should be replaceable. I suppose someone skilled at rework might be able to do such a replacement, but I wouldn't have a lot of confidence as far as reliability goes. I wonder if there's any data about signal/power losses for similar SSDs.

3) Requiring the use of proprietary tools to register genuine replacement parts (else they're nerfed or disabled), even if they were swapped from a genuine machine.

The pentalobe screws should really be a nonissue for anyone repairing one of these devices. If you're new to repairs, you look up what tools you need and buy them for a few bucks. If you're a repair veteran, you still look up the tools you need and maybe not buy them because you already have them. If getting the right screwdriver is a nonstarter for someone, it'll serve them well to have to think twice before opening their device.
 
Last edited:
If you only have 10 points to dock, then it seems there must surely be things harder to deal with than finding the right screwdriver.

I like seeing the guts of things, so I'm glad they post the tear downs, but iFixit in general has lost relevance for me. They've caved in to whims of clickbait nation.
Especially their new two-part tear downs. Come for the tear down, come again for the ads!
 
Their 4/10 score is not of particular use to me because the likelihood that I would ever open up a MacBook and try to repair it myself is about 1/100,000. . .
A couple years after I bought my 2015 MacBook Pro, I replaced its drive with a faster, larger NVMe drive. It was reasonably straightforward to do, and was a significant improvement over the original. I’m still happily using it - I’m glad it was possible.
 
The challenge with these it SoC’s is that once one thing dies, the entire SoC needs to be replaced, which includes the SSD, the GPU/CPU, the memory… Which makes replacement very expensive.

If Apple is as green as they say they are, at least don’t solder the SSD. There is no reason to solder it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy
Don't forget the SSD is proprietary with the hardware encryption and the secure enclave.
 
I spy with my little eye empty solder pads for NAND flash chips.

So it appears the 512GB version, not surprisingly, only uses 4 out of the 8 channels.

This obviously limits max read and write speeds of the SSD.

On one of the photos posted in another article (Link), I see that the 16" MBP has 8 solder pads on one side of the PCB -- I wonder if there are any on the other side of the PCB?

It would be helpful to know the # of channels used for the different SSD sizes; for the 14" MBP: 512 GB (4 X 128 GB; pictured in the ifixit teardown), 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB, and 8 TB (assume this is 8 x 1 TB).
 
Its a nice looking design internally. The battery removal was great. I cringed when he really scratched the surface of the SoC after taking the thermal compound off just to see its logo. :eek:

I'm still confused, how can plastic scratch that metal surface?

If it is so easy to scratch even with plastic, wouldn't it get deformed under heat?
 
This is an improvement. I really dislike the SSD being soldered on. That’s lame. (Memory is the reality of these SoCs it seems.) It’s especially lame because storage is so crucial in extending the life of a machine (hey Apple, let’s try actually being green).

However batteries get replaced. Of all the things that should not be glued in, it’s the battery.

Integration and miniaturization does make repair harder. There’s no reason to make it harder for any other reason though.
To be fair though, it seems like we get better thermals on Apple’s own PCIe gen 4 storage than any replaceable NVME chip. I haven’t seen a single review yet complaining of storage heating issues or any kind of throttling, like you see with some high end Samsung, WD, Adata, etc.
 
So close, Apple! Now please stop soldering on the SSDs and we’re good.
It’s not about the cost. It’s about data recovery, and security when the laptop reaches end-of-life. “Pro,” remember?
Only one last ill-considered Ive-ism to go, and we’ll have fully recovered the 2015-era Macbook utility.
 
So close, Apple! Now please stop soldering on the SSDs and we’re good.
It’s not about the cost. It’s about data recovery, and security when the laptop reaches end-of-life. “Pro,” remember?
Only one last ill-considered Ive-ism to go, and we’ll have fully recovered the 2015-era Macbook utility.
The SSD controller is built into the SoC now, so you wouldn't be able to replace it anyway.

It would have to be a clunky solution as it is with the Mac Pro where you have NAND flash ram on a board you can replace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Its a nice looking design internally. The battery removal was great. I cringed when he really scratched the surface of the SoC after taking the thermal compound off just to see its logo. :eek:
They didn’t take the compound off to just see the logo. They were going to need to replace that compound after separating the heat sink. So they had to take it all off.
 
and security when the laptop reaches end-of-life.
How much more secure can you get than a drive that’s not readable unless you have the password OR the biometrics to decrypt it? Plus, if, instead of throwing in the trash you take it to Apple, not only will they tear it apart, they’ll do so in a way they can use a lot of those materials in a new device.

Regarding data recovery… “Pro’s“ should know to have a professional backup process in place, so there’s no need to recover anything.
 
iFixit frustrate me sometimes. Clearly Apple has done a redesign inside for the better to some degree. And it’s easier to get into. But deducting points for pentolobe screws is plain dumb being Apple as used them for years now and it is a matter of switching a tool.
I originally didn't like that Apple did this as it seemed to me to be a way to prevent people from opening up their own devices. At this point, it's easy to get an appropriate screwdriver, and I assume pentalobe screws do not strip as easily, which is a big plus. I have to agree with you on this point.
 
looks like they used a prodigious amount of TIM. My last two Pros I had to replace and apply TIM to help with high CPU/GPU temps.
 
A couple years after I bought my 2015 MacBook Pro, I replaced its drive with a faster, larger NVMe drive. It was reasonably straightforward to do, and was a significant improvement over the original. I’m still happily using it - I’m glad it was possible.
I've got a 2014 MBP. What NVMe drive did you use, and in what way did the performance feel faster? Was it just on synthetic benchmarks, or did documents actually open faster?
 
I've got a 2014 MBP. What NVMe drive did you use, and in what way did the performance feel faster? Was it just on synthetic benchmarks, or did documents actually open faster?

Back in the era of 2.5 inch SSDs, I always used those from Crucial.com.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theorist9
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.