Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Being able to shower in it will help tremendously. Flush away the gunk daily.

I'm kind of surprised to hear concerns about "gunk" issues. I've had quite a few watches over the years and even my everyday link band ones have never had an problem with gunk. Have a couple micro-fiber clothes I give a rub down periodically.

I think these issues are probably more prevalent in people that wear lotions or don't make sure their watches are completely dry before putting them back away.

I'm sure with some weekly/monthly care it shouldn't be an issue for most.
 
This is exactly why Apple makes CarPlay, so you can use Siri and iMessage through the car. Yeah, it's not cheap to buy a compatible stereo and get it installed, but it's safer and legal that way. I'm just waiting for the right one to come along that I want to buy. Until then, I just don't see texts, etc until I get wherever I'm going.
 
This is exactly why Apple makes CarPlay, so you can use Siri and iMessage through the car. Yeah, it's not cheap to buy a compatible stereo and get it installed, but it's safer and legal that way. I'm just waiting for the right one to come along that I want to buy. Until then, I just don't see texts, etc until I get wherever I'm going.

My car, in her flat monotone voice, will read my text messages to me (as will Siri, since my phone is plugged in while driving). If I need to reply, I will just call them or dictate to Siri.
 
This is exactly why Apple makes CarPlay, so you can use Siri and iMessage through the car. Yeah, it's not cheap to buy a compatible stereo and get it installed, but it's safer and legal that way. I'm just waiting for the right one to come along that I want to buy. Until then, I just don't see texts, etc until I get wherever I'm going.

She works great over bluetooth in both of my non-CarPlay equipped cars. Well as good as she normally is at least...
 
Trust me - activating the watch face while your hand is on the wheel won't be as easy and reliable as you think.

All you have to do to activate the screen is lift your wrist up to the viewing position..... same as you'd do with any watch so no, it won't be hard to do.

----------

It is illegal in Georgia. I drive in Gwinnett County, a lot. I've seen this guy in action and know many that he's cited for using GPS on their phone. Any device using the internet is illegal, that's going to include the watch.



Cop claims he’s issued nearly 800 tickets for texting and driving

Yeah take that to court and win......What about the cars that are internet hot spots.... are they illegal? Bunch of boot lickers there in Ga not standing up for their rights is all that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GM44 and jaymc
You misunderstand. Looking at the radio or clock is not the same as looking at who sent an email and what the subject line is. Again, as someone who has a watch that delivers notifications, it is distracting while driving. About as distracting as reading the same notification on a phone. Far more distracting than radio controls.

The same arguments were made with Google Glass. The thought was that you could be more aware because the info was in front of you field of view. That was quickly debunked when people realized it isn't the location, it is the content that is distracting.

However, feel free to continue to roll your eyes. I work with teenagers every day.
Glad you could enlighten all of us on your inability to glance at a watch and drive. As someone who has owned a smartwatch longer than 6 months, I don't have issues glancing at it when a notification comes in. Takes just as long to glance at my 7" car display on my Volt. Or to interact with it for that matter. Now double that when driving a Tesla.

Maybe that is the difference? Maybe those of us that have been using electronics and driving since the early 80's are more capable at multitasking?

P.S. I wish I was a teenager again.
 
Your condescending attitude is getting old. I saw in official reviews earlier that one of the big problems is raising your wrist to activate the screen is buggy. They went on to say it was even frustrating at times. It's safe to say he made a valid argument and he merely mentioned Samsung to show he's not new to the smartwatch game

My condescending attitude? It's ridiculous for someone who obviously has already made up his mind to hate a product to hover around a forum and post negative comments in every thread when he's never even used said product. It would be the same thing if he posted before the launch of the 5S that Touch ID won't work because the fingerprint scanner built into his dell laptop sucks.

Actually, since the problem is not easily solvable by anyone, his experience does matter.

However, if you don't believe that, then look at all the reviews. As 9to5mac noted, the turn-on issue was often listed as a major annoyance.

And the review at daringfireball says it works better than he thought it would and he had very few issues. It doesn't matter how well it actually works, some people will be annoyed by it and some won't care. I still stand by my position that his experience with a different smart watch doesn't mean squat.
 
Last edited:
My condescending attitude? It's ridiculous for someone who obviously has already made up his mind to hate a product to hover around a forum and post negative comments in every thread when he's never even used said product. It would be the same thing if he posted before the launch of the 5S that Touch ID won't work because the fingerprint scanner built into his dell laptop sucks.



And the review at daringfireball says it works better than he thought it would and he had very few issues. It doesn't matter how well it actually works, some people will be annoyed by it and some won't care. I still stand by my position that his experience with a different smart watch doesn't mean squat.

He's entitled to an opinion and I don't think he's been trolling but rather bringing up arguments and posting his past experience with similar products. Bloomberg had a week with the watch, more than any of us, and they stated it was "maddening" at times regarding to the issue. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but he made an argument and people that have had hands on experience concurred. You've talked down to me, and a number of others in various threads. You're entitled to your opinion but at least do it in a decent manner
 
All you have to do to activate the screen is lift your wrist up to the viewing position..... same as you'd do with any watch so no, it won't be hard to do.

If this feature works anything like it does on other smartwatches, it won't be as convenient as you think. But regardless, raising your wrist means taking your hand off of the steering wheel, which itself could cause an accident if done at the wrong moment. Furthermore, putting your eyes on your watch screen means that they aren't focused on the road.
 
The Vehicle Code sections applicable in California are 23123 and 23123.5.

23123 makes it unlawful to "use" a wireless telephone unless it is hands free. The exceptions are for emergency use. It IS legal to dial the phone not hands free, but the conversation must be hands free. A recent case decision (the Spriggs case) ruled that holding a phone to view GPS navigation is legal.

23123.5 makes it illegal to use an "electronic wireless communications device" to "write, send, or read a text-based communication unless it is specifically designed and configured to allow voice-operated and hands-free operation to dictate, send or listen to a text-based communication" It does not specify a phone - it is any device. That would include a smart watch. The wording is pretty clear. You can listen to a message read aloud to you, but you can't read it. No glancing at your Apple Watch while driving unless you're checking the time.
 
How about glance at the watch for navigation while driving.

If you get stopped, can always say you just check what time it is :eek:
 
The Vehicle Code sections applicable in California are 23123 and 23123.5.

23123 makes it unlawful to "use" a wireless telephone unless it is hands free. The exceptions are for emergency use. It IS legal to dial the phone not hands free, but the conversation must be hands free. A recent case decision (the Spriggs case) ruled that holding a phone to view GPS navigation is legal.

23123.5 makes it illegal to use an "electronic wireless communications device" to "write, send, or read a text-based communication unless it is specifically designed and configured to allow voice-operated and hands-free operation to dictate, send or listen to a text-based communication" It does not specify a phone - it is any device. That would include a smart watch. The wording is pretty clear. You can listen to a message read aloud to you, but you can't read it. No glancing at your Apple Watch while driving unless you're checking the time.

Despite the language of California hands-free driving laws, the various California courts seem to differ on what actually constitutes a violation of said laws. A state appeals court in Fresno ruled that California drivers can use maps on their smartphones without risking a hands-free cellphone ticket. However, earlier in the same case the Fresno Superior Court issued a ruling that cell phones for GPS violates hands-free driving laws. I wouldn't be surprised if it goes all the way to the California Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
So you're saying one can't look at the time on a smart watch while driving? LoL.... Ok.

but people wont just be looking at their apple watch while driving for the time, and why would they? - as cars have clocks in the dash displays anyway.

Anthony
 
Illegal or not .. don't use a smart watch while driving! Do you *REALLY* want to be the one talked about on the news for running over some lady and her dog mitsy ?

I hate people who text and drive ... using a smart watch is no different.
 
Illegal or not .. don't use a smart watch while driving! Do you *REALLY* want to be the one talked about on the news for running over some lady and her dog mitsy ?

I hate people who text and drive ... using a smart watch is no different.

Especially weirdos with pink hair... :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaymc
Texting and driving is as dangerous as drunk driving and I commend the cop for stopping that. But is he really unable to discern the difference between that and having your phone function as a GPS? Or has he seen too many people try to pretend they were using the GPS and not texting? Or is his jurisdiction wildly revenue hungry? I wish I had time to read the article right now but I've got to sleep soon and want to spend the time on fun stuff and not something that might make my blood boil.

Nevermind...took a peak and it's a short article. He's not unreasonable. He likely would never pull me over because when my phone is acting as a GPS I never touch it or even really look at it. It's just speaking directions to me. He counts finger taps to determine what people are doing on their phones.

Actually, I think Officer Jesse Myers is completely unreasonable. He gave someone who works for me a ticket because she was using her iPhone in a window bracket as a GPS. She wasn't touching it in any way. She drives a convertible and he pulled up next to her on his motorcycle.

The ticket cost $150. He takes it to an extreme level. I wear a Pebble Smart Watch, by his interpretation looking at it while driving would get me a citation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GM44
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.